SUICIDE in RURAL & REMOTE AREAS of AUSTRALIA - Living is for ...
SUICIDE in RURAL & REMOTE AREAS of AUSTRALIA - Living is for ...
SUICIDE in RURAL & REMOTE AREAS of AUSTRALIA - Living is for ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Suicide <strong>in</strong> rural and remote areas <strong>of</strong> Australia 57<br />
Social support<br />
Analyses us<strong>in</strong>g the Bille-Brahe Social Support<br />
Scale showed that, compared to the sudden-death<br />
controls, suicide victims received less moral support<br />
than they needed from family and friends <strong>in</strong> both<br />
regions (Table 16). In urban areas, giv<strong>in</strong>g less moral<br />
support than needed to family and friends came<br />
out as a signifi cant predictor <strong>of</strong> suicide. However,<br />
there were no signifi cant differences <strong>in</strong> receiv<strong>in</strong>g<br />
and giv<strong>in</strong>g practical support. The analyses did not<br />
show signifi cant differences between urban and<br />
rural suicide victims.<br />
Physical health<br />
Us<strong>in</strong>g the Instrumental Activities <strong>of</strong> Daily Liv<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Scale, the analyses did not fi nd differences between<br />
the physical health <strong>of</strong> the suicide and sudden-death<br />
control groups <strong>in</strong> either region (Table 17). The<br />
Cumulative Illness Rat<strong>in</strong>g Scale (CIRS) and the<br />
Physical Self Ma<strong>in</strong>tenance Scale showed higher<br />
impairments <strong>in</strong> the sudden-death controls with<strong>in</strong><br />
urban regions. However, there were no differences<br />
<strong>in</strong> rural regions.<br />
Personality<br />
Compared to sudden-death controls, suicide victims<br />
had signifi cantly higher neurotic<strong>is</strong>m and signifi cantly<br />
lower agreeableness <strong>in</strong> both areas (Table 17).<br />
Extraversion was signifi cantly lower <strong>in</strong> suicide cases,<br />
compared to sudden-death controls, <strong>in</strong> urban areas<br />
but not <strong>in</strong> rural areas. The only signifi cant difference<br />
between rural and urban suicide cases was <strong>in</strong> the<br />
neurotic<strong>is</strong>m score, which was higher <strong>in</strong> rural suicide<br />
cases compared to urban suicide cases (mean<br />
score 31.6 <strong>in</strong> rural suicide cases and 28.3 <strong>in</strong> rural<br />
controls; t-test=2.30, p=0.023).<br />
The Overt Aggression Scale showed signifi cantly<br />
higher aggression scores <strong>in</strong> suicide cases, compared<br />
to sudden-death controls, <strong>in</strong> both regions (Table<br />
17). The general aggression score was signifi cantly<br />
higher <strong>in</strong> rural suicide victims compared to urban<br />
suicide victims (mean score 7.6 <strong>in</strong> rural suicide<br />
cases and 5.8 <strong>in</strong> urban suicide cases; t-test=3.50,<br />
p=0.001).<br />
GriffithBook FINAL 20/09.<strong>in</strong>dd 57<br />
15/11/12 4:28 PM