SUICIDE in RURAL & REMOTE AREAS of AUSTRALIA - Living is for ...
SUICIDE in RURAL & REMOTE AREAS of AUSTRALIA - Living is for ...
SUICIDE in RURAL & REMOTE AREAS of AUSTRALIA - Living is for ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
80<br />
Suicide <strong>in</strong> rural and remote areas <strong>of</strong> Australia<br />
Build<strong>in</strong>g Bridges: Learn<strong>in</strong>g from the<br />
Experts (Build<strong>in</strong>g Bridges)<br />
The Build<strong>in</strong>g Bridges Project, a suicide prevention<br />
strategy implemented across four communities, was<br />
also recently evaluated. These communities were<br />
Yarrabah, Hope Vale and Kowanyama <strong>in</strong> Far North<br />
Queensland (ex-Deed <strong>of</strong> Grant <strong>in</strong> Trust communities),<br />
and Dalby, a mixed rural community <strong>in</strong> South-West<br />
Queensland (McKay et al, 2009). The Build<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Bridges Project built on, and extended, responses<br />
to self-harm<strong>in</strong>g and suicidal behaviours developed<br />
<strong>in</strong> Yarrabah dur<strong>in</strong>g the 1990s. Yarrabah’s prevention<br />
activities were designed to protect at-r<strong>is</strong>k <strong>in</strong>dividuals<br />
by strengthen<strong>in</strong>g and empower<strong>in</strong>g both the <strong>in</strong>dividual<br />
and the community <strong>in</strong> which they lived. However,<br />
Build<strong>in</strong>g Bridges was <strong>in</strong>novative <strong>in</strong> that it util<strong>is</strong>ed<br />
horizontal knowledge-shar<strong>in</strong>g with<strong>in</strong> and across<br />
communities to <strong>in</strong>crease awareness <strong>of</strong> suicide r<strong>is</strong>k and<br />
protective factors. Experiences, skills and knowledge<br />
from each community were shared via Men’s Groups,<br />
FWB and HITnet (<strong>in</strong>teractive <strong>in</strong><strong>for</strong>mation kiosks).<br />
Participatory Action Research (PAR) methodology<br />
ensured the research team worked collaboratively<br />
with<strong>in</strong> the communities, learn<strong>in</strong>g from experiences<br />
specifi c to each community, and adjust<strong>in</strong>g activities<br />
accord<strong>in</strong>gly, to better implement and d<strong>is</strong>sem<strong>in</strong>ate<br />
suicide prevention activities (McKay et al, 2009).<br />
The evaluation process <strong>in</strong>corporated focus groups<br />
and one-on-one <strong>in</strong>terviews with project <strong>of</strong>fi cers,<br />
participants, service providers and members <strong>of</strong><br />
the community <strong>in</strong> all four communities. In<strong>for</strong>mation<br />
gathered from these focus groups and <strong>in</strong>terviews<br />
made clear that the activities strengthened community<br />
connectedness, <strong>in</strong>creased community capacity and<br />
strengthened empowerment. Further, community<br />
participants perceived the project to be successful<br />
based on (seem<strong>in</strong>gly small) changes that directly<br />
affected them. However, the short-term nature <strong>of</strong><br />
Build<strong>in</strong>g Bridges, and the myriad other <strong>in</strong>terventions<br />
also occurr<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> these communities, made it diffi cult<br />
to assess the impact <strong>of</strong> activities on any changes <strong>in</strong><br />
the self-harm and suicidal behaviours that occurred <strong>in</strong><br />
each community.<br />
GriffithBook FINAL 20/09.<strong>in</strong>dd 80<br />
15/11/12 4:28 PM