CWRB Briefing Slides - U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

More documents

Recommendations

Info

US Army Corps of Engineers ® Rationale for SWD Support • Concur with Fort Worth District (SWF) Commander’s findings and recommendations • Report complies with all applicable policies and laws in place at this time – FEMA funded land-buy within project site – To be addressed in PED • Anticipate a favorable response to the draft Chief’s Report – USFWS has not concurred with plan (issue: want different mitigation strategy than USACE regulations allow) – Agreed to find solution in PED • Plan supported by sponsor and congressional delegation One Corps Serving The Army and the Nation 9/8/2006
US Army Corps of Engineers ® Certification of Legal and Policy Compliance • Legal certification by SWF Counsel on 10 Oct 2006 • Technical and policy compliance: – Flood Damage Reduction Center of Expertise was consulted. Two Multi- District ITR teams was formed. • Tulsa District (SWT) was the lead for Wharton Component. • Louisville District (LRL) was the lead for the Onion Creek Component, with assistance from Los Angeles (SPL) and SWT. – All ITR comments resolved. – ITR Team certification: • 17 Aug 2006 (Wharton) • 18 Aug 2006 (Onion Creek) One Corps Serving The Army and the Nation 9/8/2006
Page 1 and 2:
Presentation to the CIVIL WORKS REV
Page 3 and 4:
Desired Action • CWRB approve the
Page 5 and 6:
Agenda • Background • Project D
Page 7 and 8:
Project Locations October 26, 2006
Page 9 and 10:
PDT Performance • Performed well
Page 11 and 12:
Planning Process (ER 1105-2-100) 10
Page 13 and 14:
Wharton Flooding ▼1935 Flood - Do
Page 15 and 16:
Existing Conditions • Rapid urban
Page 17 and 18:
Flood Damage Reduction Alternatives
Page 19 and 20:
Overview of Onion Creek - Timber Cr
Page 21 and 22:
Overview of Onion Creek OC Forest/Y
Page 23 and 24: October 26, 2006 OC Forest/Yarabee
Page 25 and 26: Onion Creek Policy & Technical Revi
Page 27 and 28: Existing Conditions • Significant
Page 29 and 30: • No Action • Buyout • Levees
Page 31 and 32: Wharton Component Cost Apportionmen
Page 33 and 34: Proposed Milestone Schedule Milesto
Page 35 and 36: Agency Review • USFWS recommended
Page 37 and 38: 4. Reduce Losses USACE Civil Works
Page 39 and 40: USACE Environmental Operating Princ
Page 41 and 42: The 12 Points 1. Effectively Implem
Page 43 and 44: Recommendation • Recommend the Ci
Page 45 and 46: www.lcra.org Texas Water Developmen
Page 47 and 48: www.lcra.org Coordinated Effort Riv
Page 49 and 50: www.lcra.org City of Austin Remarks
Page 51 and 52: Flash Flood Alley 1998 1997 Shoal C
Page 53 and 54: City of Austin Onion Creek Forest /
Page 55 and 56: Area of Interest: Timber Creek Segm
Page 57 and 58: 9/8/2006 57
Page 59 and 60: July 1869 June 1941 November 2001 O
Page 61 and 62: Summary of Travis County/FEMA Buyou
Page 63 and 64: Availability of County Matching Fun
Page 65 and 66: www.lcra.org City of Wharton Remark
Page 67 and 68: Nan Ya Plastics, Corp USA Dawson El
Page 69 and 70: CITY OF WHARTON, TEXAS FEMA RE-MAPP
Page 71 and 72: CITY OF WHARTON, TEXAS • City Tha
Page 73: US Army Corps of Engineers ® Prese
Page 77 and 78: US Army Corps of Engineers ® SWD R
Page 79 and 80: Lower Colorado River Basin, TX Phas
Page 81 and 82: Documentation Lower Colorado River
Page 83 and 84: Lower Colorado River Basin - Onion
Page 85 and 86: Lower Colorado River Basin - Onion
Page 87 and 88: Lower Colorado River Basin - Wharto
Page 89: Lower Colorado River Basin Flood Da
show all

CWRB Briefing Slides - U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?