CWRB Briefing Slides - U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Lower Colorado River Basin - Wharton Flood Damage Reduction and Ecosystem Restoration Project Interior Drainage Concern: Sumps were added to the recommended plan to deal with interior drainage d issues. No minimal facilities were determined. If the recommended sumps are larger than needed to meet the minimal facility requirement then they must either be incrementally justified or identified as a component that is a 100% 1 non-Federal cost. Reason: As per EM 1110-2-1413 1413 and PGL #37 minimal facilities are intended as a starting point from which additional interior facilities planning will be based. Resolution: The district needs to evaluate the minimum facility requirements and determine the difference between the minimal facility and the recommended option. Resolution Impact: Should not delay initiation <strong>of</strong> S&A review. Perform P analysis during during S&A review. 9/8/2006 88
Lower Colorado River Basin Flood Damage Reduction and Ecosystem Restoration Project HQUSACE Policy Compliance Review Team RECOMMENDATION Release the report and EA for S&A Review Resolve remaining issues prior to final COE report 9/8/2006 89
Page 1 and 2:
Presentation to the CIVIL WORKS REV
Page 3 and 4:
Desired Action • CWRB approve the
Page 5 and 6:
Agenda • Background • Project D
Page 7 and 8:
Project Locations October 26, 2006
Page 9 and 10:
PDT Performance • Performed well
Page 11 and 12:
Planning Process (ER 1105-2-100) 10
Page 13 and 14:
Wharton Flooding ▼1935 Flood - Do
Page 15 and 16:
Existing Conditions • Rapid urban
Page 17 and 18:
Flood Damage Reduction Alternatives
Page 19 and 20:
Overview of Onion Creek - Timber Cr
Page 21 and 22:
Overview of Onion Creek OC Forest/Y
Page 23 and 24:
October 26, 2006 OC Forest/Yarabee
Page 25 and 26:
Onion Creek Policy & Technical Revi
Page 27 and 28:
Existing Conditions • Significant
Page 29 and 30:
• No Action • Buyout • Levees
Page 31 and 32:
Wharton Component Cost Apportionmen
Page 33 and 34:
Proposed Milestone Schedule Milesto
Page 35 and 36:
Agency Review • USFWS recommended
Page 37 and 38: 4. Reduce Losses USACE Civil Works
Page 39 and 40: USACE Environmental Operating Princ
Page 41 and 42: The 12 Points 1. Effectively Implem
Page 43 and 44: Recommendation • Recommend the Ci
Page 45 and 46: www.lcra.org Texas Water Developmen
Page 47 and 48: www.lcra.org Coordinated Effort Riv
Page 49 and 50: www.lcra.org City of Austin Remarks
Page 51 and 52: Flash Flood Alley 1998 1997 Shoal C
Page 53 and 54: City of Austin Onion Creek Forest /
Page 55 and 56: Area of Interest: Timber Creek Segm
Page 57 and 58: 9/8/2006 57
Page 59 and 60: July 1869 June 1941 November 2001 O
Page 61 and 62: Summary of Travis County/FEMA Buyou
Page 63 and 64: Availability of County Matching Fun
Page 65 and 66: www.lcra.org City of Wharton Remark
Page 67 and 68: Nan Ya Plastics, Corp USA Dawson El
Page 69 and 70: CITY OF WHARTON, TEXAS FEMA RE-MAPP
Page 71 and 72: CITY OF WHARTON, TEXAS • City Tha
Page 73 and 74: US Army Corps of Engineers ® Prese
Page 75 and 76: US Army Corps of Engineers ® Certi
Page 77 and 78: US Army Corps of Engineers ® SWD R
Page 79 and 80: Lower Colorado River Basin, TX Phas
Page 81 and 82: Documentation Lower Colorado River
Page 83 and 84: Lower Colorado River Basin - Onion
Page 85 and 86: Lower Colorado River Basin - Onion
Page 87: Lower Colorado River Basin - Wharto
show all

CWRB Briefing Slides - U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?