tivity on the carmel faul

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Hofstetter, A., Feldman, L. and Rotstein, Y., 1991. Crustal structure of Israel: constraints from teleseismic and gravity data. Geophys. J. Int. 104: 371-380. Hofstetter, A., Ron, H., and van Eck, T., 1989. Mt. Carmel Earthquake Sequence. Seismol. Div. Inst. Petrol. Res. Geophys., Holon, Israel 303/1829/88 (1). Kafri, U., 1969. Recent crustal movements in northern Israel. J. Geophys. Res. 74: 4246- 4258. Kafri, U., 1970, Pleistocene tectonic movements in the coastal area. Isr. J. Earth Sci. 19: 147-152. Kagan, E.J., 2002. Dating large earthquakes using damaged cave deposits, Soreq and Har- Tuv caves, central Israel. M.Sc. Thesis, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Kagan, E.J., Agnon, A., Bar-Matthews, M. and Ayalon, A., 2005. Dating large infrequent earthquakes by damaged cave deposits. Geology 33: 261-264. Kagan, E.J., Stein, M., Bar-Matthews, M., Agnon, A., 2007. A Tale of Two Cataclysmic Earthquakes: 39 and 52 kyr BP, Dead Sea Transform, Israel; a Multi-archive Study. Eos. Trans. AGU. Fall Meet. Suppl. 88(52). Karcz, Y., 1958. The Geology of northwestern Mount Carmel. M.Sc. Thesis, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Karcz, Y. 1959, The structure of the northern Carmel. Bull. Res. Counc. Isr. 8G: 119-130. Kashai, E., 1966. The geology of eastern and southwestern Mount Carmel. Ph.D. Thesis, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Kaufman, A., Wasserburg, G.J., Porcelli, D., Bar-Matthews, M., Ayalon, A., Halitcz, L. 1998. U-Th isotope systematics from the Soreq Cave, Israel and climatic correlations. Earth and Planetary Sci. Let. 156: 141-155. Kostov, K. 2002, Speleothems as paleoseismic indicators: examples from Bulgaria. Atlas Document # caig-35 Kupperman, G., 2005. Reconstruction of flood periods by dating speleothems in Nahal Hazerz, northern Negev. Geol. Sur. of Isr. Rep. GSI/1105. (in Hebrew). Lacave, C., Levret, A., Koller, M.G. 2000. Measurments of natural frequencies and damping of speleothems. Proc. of the 12 th World Conf. on Earthqu. Auckland, New- Zealand. 2118. Lacave, C. Koller, M.G. and Eozcue, J.J. 2004. What can be concluded about seismic history from broken speleothems J. Earthqu. Eng. 8(3): 431-455. Lemeille, F., Cushing, M., Carbon, D., Grellet, B., Bitterli, T., Flehoc, C. and Innocent, C. 1999, C-seismic ruptures and deformations recorded by speleothems in the epicentral zone of the Bazel earthquake. Geodinam. Acta, 12: 3-4, 179-191. Li W.X., Lundberg, J., Dickin, A.P., Ford, D.C., Schwarcz, H.P., McNutt, R., Williams, D., 1989. High-precision mass-spectrometric uranium-series dating of cave deposits and implications for paleoclimate studies. Nature 339:534-536. Ludwig, K.R., 2003. Mathematical-statistical treatment of data and errors for Th-230/U geochronology. Rev. Min. & Geochem. 52: 631-656. Ludwig, K.R., 2008. Users manual for Isoplot 3.7. Berk. Geochron. Cen. Spec. Pub. 4. Ludwig, K.R. and Titterington, D.M. 1994, Calculation of 230Th/U isochrones, ages and errors. Geoch. et Cosmochim. Acta. 58 (22): 5031-5042. Marco, S., Stein, M., Agnon, A. and Ron, H. 1996. Long-term earthquake clustering: A 50,000 year paleoseismic record in the Dead Sea Graben. J. Geophys. R. 101: 6179- 6191. Marco, S., Agnon, A., Ussishkin, D., Finkelstein, I., 2006. Megiddo Earthquakes, in Ussishkin, D., and Finkelstein, I., eds., Megiddo, Volume IV: T.A. Univ. 568-575. Marco, S., Agnon, A., Finkelstein, I., Ussishkin, D., in prep. Archeoseismic observations by the Carmel fault: Megiddo (Armageddon) versus Yoqne'am. 85
Migowski, C., Agnon, A., Bookmanb, R., Negendanka, J.F.W., Stein, M., 2004. Recurrence pattern of Holocene earthquakes along the Dead Sea transform revealed by varve-counting and radiocarbon dating of lacustrine sediments. Earth and Planet. Sci. Let. 222: 301– 314. Morinaga, H., Yonezawa, T., Adachi, Y., Inokuchi, H., Goto, H., Yaskawa, K., 1994. The possibility of inferring paleoseismicity from the paleomagnetic dating of speleothems, western Japan. Techtonophysics 230: 241-248. Muire-Wood, R. and King, G.C.P., 1993. Hydrological signatures of earthquake strain. J. Geophys. Res. 98, 22, 035-22,068. Panno, S.V., Lundstrom, C.C., Hackley, K.C., Curry, B.B., Fouke, B., Zhang, Z., 2006. Phil. Ann. Meet. 229-6. Picard, L.Y. and Kashai, E., 1958, On the lithostratigraphy and tectonics of the Carmel. Bull. Res. Counc. Isr. 7G: 1-9. Postpischl, D., Aostini, S., Forti, P., Quinif, Y., 1991. Paleoseismicity from karst sediments: the "Grotta del Cervo" cave case study (Central Italy). Tectonophysics 193: 33-44. Richards, D.A., Dorale, J.A., 2003. Uranium-series chronology and environmental applications of speleothems. Rev. in Min. & Geochem. 52: 407–460. Ron, H., Fruend, R., Garfunkel, Z. and Nur, A., 1984. Block rotation by strike-slip faulting: structural and paleomagnetic evidence. J. Geophys. Res. 89 (B7): 6256-6270. Ron, H., Nur, A., Hofstetter, A., 1990. Late Cenozoic and recent strike slip tectonics in Mt. Carmel, northern Israel. Ann. Tecton. 4: 70-80. Rotstein, Y., Bruner, I., Kafri, U., 1993. High-resolution seismic imaging of the CF and its implications for the structure of Mt. Carmel. Isr. J. Earth Sci. 42: 55-69. Salamon, A., Zaslavski, I., Shtebelman, V., Rockwell, T., 2001. Earthquake hazards in Nesher industrial plant- Haifa Bay. Isr. Geo. Soc. Annual meeting, Abs. booklet: 85. (in Hebrew). Salamon, A., Hofstetter, A., Garfunkel, Z., Ron, H., 2003. Seismotectonics of the Sinai subplate- The eastern Mediterranean region. Geoph. J. Int. 155: 149-173. Sass, E., 1957. The Volcanic Occurrences in Mt. Carmel. M.Sc. Thesis, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. Sass, E., 1980. Late Cretaceous volcanism in Mt. Carmel, Israel. Isr. J. Erth Sci. 29: 8-24. Sass, E. and Bein, A. 1982. The Cretaceous carbonate platform in Israel. Cretac. Res. 3(1/2): 135-144. Sass, E., Bein, A., Arkin, Y. and Bartov, Y., 1977, Geological photomap (Zihron Ya-akov erea). Geol. Surv. Isr. Jer. Israel sheet. 145-200. Schattner, U., Ben-Avraham, Z., Reshef, M., Bar-Am, G., Lazar, M., 2006. Oligocene– Miocene formation of the Haifa basin: Qishon–Sirhan rifting coeval with the Red Sea–Suez rift system. Tectonophysics 419: 1-12. Segev, A., and Sass, E., 2006. The geology of Central and Southern Mount Carmel. Isr. Geol. Soc. Annual meeting, Field Trip 4: 69-87 (in Hebrew). Shamir, G., 2007. Earthquake epicenter distribution and mechanisms in northern Israel. Geol. Surv. Isr. Jer. Rep. GSI/16/07. (in Hebrew). Sneh, A., Bartov, Y. and Rosensaft, M. 1998. Geological Map of Israel, 1:200,000. Geol. Surv. of Isr. Sheet 1. Stern, E., Geva H., Paris. A., eds. 2008. The New Encyclopedia of Archaeological Excavations in the Holy Land, Jerusalem and Washington DC: The Israel Exploration Society and Biblical Archaeological Society. 5. Supp. Vol. Szeidovitz, Gy., Paskaleva, I., Gribovszki1, K., Kostov, K., Sur´any, G., Varga, P., Nikolov, G., 2008. Estimation of an upper limit on prehistoric peak ground 86
Page 1:
Dating Paleo-seismic Activi
Page 5 and 6:
Abstract Mt Carmel is defined to it
Page 7 and 8:
Table of content 1. Introduction...
Page 9:
List of Tables Table 1: Isochron sa
Page 12 and 13:
1998; Lacave et al., 2004; Kagan et
Page 14 and 15:
statistical study indicated that th
Page 16 and 17:
The first step in establishing viab
Page 18 and 19:
crystal lattice; (5) when detrital
Page 20 and 21:
caused by curved segments along the
Page 22 and 23:
1 2 Yagur Jalame 3 4 Yoqne’am Meg
Page 24 and 25:
1.4.1 Seismicity and paleo-seismici
Page 26 and 27:
eferences to Early Bronze Age I and
Page 28 and 29:
Figure 5: Earthquakes for the years
Page 30 and 31:
15 30 Figure 7: Geological map of t
Page 32 and 33:
a b c Figure 9: Pictures from a qua
Page 34 and 35:
3 1 2 4 5 Figure 11: Seismic featur
Page 36 and 37:
the cave can be viewed in Appendix
Page 38 and 39: Figure 14: Sample DN-7 3.3 Dating o
Page 40 and 41: [3] ( 230 Th)/( 232 Th) d = ( 234 U
Page 42 and 43: extremely high errors for these val
Page 44 and 45: DN-62 Iso-III Iso-II Iso-I Iso-V Is
Page 46 and 47: contribution of 232 Th carried by d
Page 48 and 49: 3.3.3 Cluster dating Osmond isochro
Page 50 and 51: 4. Results A total of 68 speleothem
Page 52 and 53: Table 5: Denya Cave seismite I.D.'s
Page 54 and 55: Figure 17: Dated seismite uncorrect
Page 56 and 57: Table 6: Dated seismite samples' is
Page 58 and 59: 1.14 1.10 1.06 234 U/ 238 U 1.02 0.
Page 60 and 61: Sample name 230/238 err 234/238 err
Page 68 and 69: Seismic events in Denya Cave Broken
Page 70 and 71: isochron of 10.4ka (MSWD = 107), it
Page 72 and 73: data-point error ellipses are 2σ 1
Page 74 and 75: 5. Discussion The purpose of the pr
Page 76 and 77: case, it is not clear which of thos
Page 78 and 79: indicates that there is a possibili
Page 80 and 81: 5.2.1 Considerations for comparison
Page 82 and 83: easonable assumption that whatever
Page 84 and 85: establish a unique correction facto
Page 86 and 87: References Achmon, M., 1986. The Ca
Page 90 and 91: acceleration using the parameter of
Page 92 and 93: I-a. Table of Denya Cave speleothem
Page 95 and 96: DEN-2 Sample DEN-2 is a type C-1 se
Page 97 and 98: DN-4 Sample DN-4 is a type C-1 seis
Page 99 and 100: DN-7 DN-7 appeared to be a stalagmi
Page 101 and 102: DN-11, 12 and 13 These samples are
Page 103 and 104: Seismic contact pre 12.51ka DN-17 D
Page 105 and 106: DN-21 DN-21 is a type C-1 seismite.
Page 107 and 108: DN-25 DN-25 is a sample of flowston
Page 111 and 112: DN-34 DN-34 is a flowstone core of
Page 113 and 114: DN-37a DN-37a is a flowstone core i
Page 117 and 118: DN-43 This stalactite was located c
Page 119 and 120: Seismic contact DN-45 DN-45 is a ty
Page 121 and 122: DN-47 DN-47 is a flowstone core of
Page 123 and 124: DN-51 DN-51 is a stalactite formati
Page 125 and 126: DN-62 DN-62 is a flowstone sample o
Page 127 and 128: DN-65 DN-65 is a flowstone sample o
Page 129 and 130: Seismic contact DN-68 DN-68 is a a
Page 131 and 132: II-b. Laboratory protocol for the p
Page 133 and 134: Appendix III: All seismites conside
Page 135 and 136: ,10.4±0.7 שהשאירו את חו
Page 138:
משרד התשתיות הלאומ
show all

tivity on the carmel faul

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?