tivity on the carmel faul

More documents

Recommendations

Info

I-a. Table of Denya Cave speleothem samples Table 1: Denya Cave sample I.D.'s. Samples marked in red are spleo-seismites. Sample Area Seismic Processed Lab fig. i.d’s Comments i.d. in map contact DN-1 A No No DN-2 A Yes Yes 1,2,3,4 DEN-2 A Yes Yes pre DN-3 A No No No calcite DN-4 A Yes Yes pre I, II (post), III, top & Isochrons 1, 2 DN-5 B No No DN-6 C Yes Yes a-pre (post), b-pre, c-pre I, II, III,IV,V DN-7 C Yes Yes 45-pre, 46-post I, II, pre, post I, II, 47-post DN-8 B No No DN-9 C Yes Yes pre, pre-down, pre-bottom, pre (post) DN-10 B No No No calcite DN-11 B Yes No Not enough material DN-12 B Yes No Not enough material DN-13 B Yes No Not enough material DN-14 B Yes Yes a: pre I, PRE-I DN-16 A No No Isochron DN-17 A Yes Yes pre, post DN-18 A No No No calcite DN-19 A Yes Yes pre I, II DN-20 A No No DN-21 B Yes No pre I, II DN-22 B Yes Yes pre I, II, post I, II DN-23 B No No DN-24 B No No DN-25 B Yes Yes post I, II DN-26 B Yes Yes top: pre I, post I, II DN-27 B Yes Yes post II DN-28 B No No DN-29 B No No DN-30 B No No DN-31 B No No DN-32 A No No DN-33 A Yes Yes c1-pre, post, c2-pre, post DN-34 B Yes Yes a: pre I, II, III DN-35 B No No Isochron DN-36 B Yes Yes pre I, II, III, post I, II DN-37 B Yes Yes a: pre, post DN-38 B No No DN-39 B Yes No Very large detritic component DN-40 B Yes Yes pre- I, II, post I Age reversal DN-41 B No No DN-42 B Yes Yes e-pre, post DN-43 B Yes No Not enough material DN-44 A Yes Yes pre, post DN-45 A Yes Yes pre, post DN-46 A Yes Yes pre I, II, post Age reversal
DN-47 A Yes Yes pre I, II, post I DN-48 A Yes Yes pre, post DN-49 A No No DN-50 A No No DN-51 A Yes Yes pre I-IV, post I DN-52 A Yes Yes pre, post DN-53 A No No Isochron DN-54 A No No DN-55 A No No DN-56 A No No DN-57 A No No DN-58 A No No DN-59 A No No DN-60 A No No DN-61 A No No DN-62 A Yes Yes pre I, II, post II & Isochron DN-63 A Yes Yes pre I, II, post DN-64 A No No DN-65 A Yes Yes pre, post DN-66 A Yes Yes b-pre, c-pre I, II, III, post I DN-67 A No No DN-68 A Yes Yes pre
Page 1:
Dating Paleo-seismic Activi
Page 5 and 6:
Abstract Mt Carmel is defined to it
Page 7 and 8:
Table of content 1. Introduction...
Page 9:
List of Tables Table 1: Isochron sa
Page 12 and 13:
1998; Lacave et al., 2004; Kagan et
Page 14 and 15:
statistical study indicated that th
Page 16 and 17:
The first step in establishing viab
Page 18 and 19:
crystal lattice; (5) when detrital
Page 20 and 21:
caused by curved segments along the
Page 22 and 23:
1 2 Yagur Jalame 3 4 Yoqne’am Meg
Page 24 and 25:
1.4.1 Seismicity and paleo-seismici
Page 26 and 27:
eferences to Early Bronze Age I and
Page 28 and 29:
Figure 5: Earthquakes for the years
Page 30 and 31:
15 30 Figure 7: Geological map of t
Page 32 and 33:
a b c Figure 9: Pictures from a qua
Page 34 and 35:
3 1 2 4 5 Figure 11: Seismic featur
Page 36 and 37:
the cave can be viewed in Appendix
Page 38 and 39:
Figure 14: Sample DN-7 3.3 Dating o
Page 40 and 41:
[3] ( 230 Th)/( 232 Th) d = ( 234 U
Page 42 and 43: extremely high errors for these val
Page 44 and 45: DN-62 Iso-III Iso-II Iso-I Iso-V Is
Page 46 and 47: contribution of 232 Th carried by d
Page 48 and 49: 3.3.3 Cluster dating Osmond isochro
Page 50 and 51: 4. Results A total of 68 speleothem
Page 52 and 53: Table 5: Denya Cave seismite I.D.'s
Page 54 and 55: Figure 17: Dated seismite uncorrect
Page 56 and 57: Table 6: Dated seismite samples' is
Page 58 and 59: 1.14 1.10 1.06 234 U/ 238 U 1.02 0.
Page 60 and 61: Sample name 230/238 err 234/238 err
Page 68 and 69: Seismic events in Denya Cave Broken
Page 70 and 71: isochron of 10.4ka (MSWD = 107), it
Page 72 and 73: data-point error ellipses are 2σ 1
Page 74 and 75: 5. Discussion The purpose of the pr
Page 76 and 77: case, it is not clear which of thos
Page 78 and 79: indicates that there is a possibili
Page 80 and 81: 5.2.1 Considerations for comparison
Page 82 and 83: easonable assumption that whatever
Page 84 and 85: establish a unique correction facto
Page 86 and 87: References Achmon, M., 1986. The Ca
Page 88 and 89: Hofstetter, A., Feldman, L. and Rot
Page 90 and 91: acceleration using the parameter of
Page 95 and 96: DEN-2 Sample DEN-2 is a type C-1 se
Page 97 and 98: DN-4 Sample DN-4 is a type C-1 seis
Page 99 and 100: DN-7 DN-7 appeared to be a stalagmi
Page 101 and 102: DN-11, 12 and 13 These samples are
Page 103 and 104: Seismic contact pre 12.51ka DN-17 D
Page 105 and 106: DN-21 DN-21 is a type C-1 seismite.
Page 107 and 108: DN-25 DN-25 is a sample of flowston
Page 111 and 112: DN-34 DN-34 is a flowstone core of
Page 113 and 114: DN-37a DN-37a is a flowstone core i
Page 117 and 118: DN-43 This stalactite was located c
Page 119 and 120: Seismic contact DN-45 DN-45 is a ty
Page 121 and 122: DN-47 DN-47 is a flowstone core of
Page 123 and 124: DN-51 DN-51 is a stalactite formati
Page 125 and 126: DN-62 DN-62 is a flowstone sample o
Page 127 and 128: DN-65 DN-65 is a flowstone sample o
Page 129 and 130: Seismic contact DN-68 DN-68 is a a
Page 131 and 132: II-b. Laboratory protocol for the p
Page 133 and 134: Appendix III: All seismites conside
Page 135 and 136: ,10.4±0.7 שהשאירו את חו
Page 138: משרד התשתיות הלאומ
show all

tivity on the carmel faul

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?