<strong>The</strong> structure of budgets for projects subsidised by the Government Council for <strong>Drug</strong> Policy Coordination 33 , including resources other than those made available from the state and local budgets, is outlined in Table 1-6. In <strong>2010</strong> approximately half of their income originated from the state budget, with the GCDPC providing almost one third of the sum. Approximately one third of all the income originated from local budgets and 14% from other home sources (mainly the services’ own earnings). <strong>The</strong> period 2006–<strong>2010</strong> showed an increase in the proportion of funding contributed by the Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs, while the amount of resources available from the GCDPC’s subsidies declined. Table 1-6: Income of providers of drug policy programmes subsidised by the GCDPC in 2006–<strong>2010</strong> (by source) 2006 2007 2008 2009 <strong>2010</strong> Source € thousand % € thousand % € thousand % € thousand % € thousand % State budget 5,585 51,3 5,984 52,9 6,352 53,9 6,283 54,0 5,880 51.3 GCDPC 3,841 35,3 3,798 33,6 3,573 30,3 3,527 30,3 3,214 28.0 Ministry of Education 56 0,5 59 0,5 115 1,0 54 0,5 53 0.5 Ministry of Labour and 1,460 13,4 1,872 16,6 2,350 19,9 2,441 21,0 2,428 21.2 Social Affairs Ministry of the Interior 4 0,0 5 0,0 5 0,0 0 0,0 0 0.0 Ministry of Health 134 1,2 203 1,8 240 2,0 238 2,0 117 1.0 Ministry of Justice 4 0,0 14 0,1 22 0,2 21 0,2 21 0.2 Other ministries 0 0,0 0 0,0 18 0,1 0 0,0 0 0.0 Labour Offices 86 0,8 34 0,3 29 0,2 0 0,0 48 0.4 Local budgets 3,504 32,2 3,821 33,8 4,033 34,2 4,204 36,1 3,933 34.3 Regions 1,886 17,3 2,312 20,4 1,796 15,2 2,441 21,0 3,443 30.0 Municipalities 1,618 14,9 1,508 13,3 2,237 19,0 1,763 15,2 490 4.3 Other home resources 1,790 16,5 1,213 10,7 1,249 10,6 990 8,5 1,613 14.1 Sponsorship and fundraising 306 2,8 212 1,9 240 2,0 199 1,7 258 2.3 Services’ own earnings and clients’ 542 5,0 516 4,6 480 4,1 538 4,6 750 6.5 contributions Endowments 362 3,3 55 0,5 51 0,4 0 0,0 106 0.9 Others 579 5,3 430 3,8 477 4,1 253 2,2 498 4.3 Foreign resources 0 0,0 291 2,6 154 1,3 153 1,3 39 0.3 EU funds 0 0,0 237 2,1 111 0,9 153 1,3 39 0.3 Other foreign resources 0 0,0 55 0,5 43 0,4 0 0,0 0 0.0 Total 10,879 100,0 11,309 100,0 11,787 100,0 11,630 100,0 11,465 100.0 Note: 2009 average exchange rate was used (1€ = CZK 26.445) for recalculation in 2006–2009. <strong>2010</strong> average exchange rate (1€ = CZK 25.290) was used ) for recalculation in <strong>2010</strong>. 33 <strong>The</strong> set of projects supported by the GCDPC may be considered the core of the <strong>Czech</strong> network of drug services provided by the nongovernmental non-health sector. page 21
Total state budget Regions Table 1-7: <strong>2010</strong> drug policy expenditures from state and local budgets by location (region) of use (€ thousand) Regions GCDPC Ministry of Education Ministry of Defence Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs Ministry of Health Ministry of Justice General Customs Headquarters National <strong>Drug</strong> Headquarters Municipalities Total local budgets Total Total (%) Prague 801 49 – 409 145 – – – 1,405 2,046 422 2,468 3,873 15.6 Central Bohemia 94 71 – 803 27 – – – 995 645 206 851 1,846 7.4 South Bohemia 160 37 – 149 44 – – – 390 331 67 398 788 3.2 Pilsen 163 19 – 52 16 – – – 251 274 295 570 821 3.3 Karlovy Vary 54 16 – 45 15 – – – 129 232 16 247 376 1.5 Ústí nad Labem 274 21 – 252 26 – – – 572 184 305 489 1,062 4.3 Liberec 65 29 – 133 0 – – – 227 325 109 434 661 2.7 Hradec Králové 79 41 – 18 24 – – – 162 273 28 301 462 1.9 Pardubice 52 30 – 66 0 – – – 148 269 69 338 486 2.0 Vysočina 61 58 – 217 7 – – – 342 134 30 164 506 2.0 South Moravia 270 33 – 302 43 – – – 648 636 226 862 1,510 6.1 Olomouc 194 47 – 276 6 – – – 523 346 92 438 961 3.9 Zlín 73 22 – 104 1 – – – 201 696 124 820 1,020 4.1 Moravia-Silesia 141 24 – 133 1 – – – 299 1,267 466 1,733 2,032 8.2 Expenditure with regional designation Expenditure with central designation 2,481 497 – 2,959 355 – – – 6,292 7,660 2,454 10,113 16,405 66.1 900 95 173 668 494 280 83 ,5,709 8,402 0 0 0 8,402 33.9 Total 3,381 592 173 3,628 849 280 83 ,5,709 14,694 7,660 2,454 10,113 24,807 100.0 – including investment 0 0 0 0 32 0 83 0 115 0 0 0 115 0.5 expenditure Total (%) 13.6 2.4 0.7 14.6 3.4 1.1 0.3 23,0 59.2 30.9 9.9 40.8 100.0 – page 22
- Page 1: Annual Report The Czech Republic 20
- Page 5 and 6: Annual Report: The Czech Republic -
- Page 7 and 8: PART B: SELECTED ISSUES............
- Page 9 and 10: In 2010 the very first representati
- Page 11 and 12: In the Czech Republic, the treatmen
- Page 13 and 14: PART A: NEW DEVELOPMENTS AND TRENDS
- Page 15 and 16: ange applies to addictologists who
- Page 17 and 18: Republic has been reporting the hig
- Page 19 and 20: Wenceslas Square and in the surroun
- Page 21 and 22: Regions of the Czech Republic to ca
- Page 23 and 24: Region Pardubice Vysočina South Mo
- Page 25 and 26: educe drug supply (particularly to
- Page 27: Map 1-1: 2010 drug policy expenditu
- Page 31 and 32: 1.3.2 Drug Treatment Costs Incurred
- Page 33 and 34: Table 1-9: Costs incurred by health
- Page 35 and 36: 2 Drug Use in the General Populatio
- Page 37 and 38: Table 2-2: Prevalence rates of use
- Page 39 and 40: The M-CIDI questionnaire, containin
- Page 41 and 42: Table 2-6: Prevalence rates of use
- Page 43 and 44: Figure 2-2: Attitudes towards crimi
- Page 45 and 46: Table 2-7: Prevalence of use of can
- Page 47 and 48: Table 2-8: 2010 Safer Party clients
- Page 49 and 50: school curriculum and school rules;
- Page 51 and 52: partly also by regional public heal
- Page 53 and 54: 3.4 Indicated prevention Indicated
- Page 55 and 56: 4 Problem Drug Use The EMCDDA defin
- Page 57 and 58: Table 4-2: Prevalence estimates of
- Page 59 and 60: Table 4-4: Prevalence estimates of
- Page 61 and 62: The general population studies (see
- Page 63 and 64: Information on treatment and counse
- Page 65 and 66: 5.2.1 Professional Competency of Se
- Page 67 and 68: Table 5-6: Number of outpatient hea
- Page 69 and 70: Table 5-8: Number of healthcare fac
- Page 71 and 72: The proportions found for prescribi
- Page 73 and 74: Map 5-2: Sobering-up station networ
- Page 75 and 76: Table 5-14: Network of inpatient fa
- Page 77 and 78: care centres report to diagnostic i
- Page 79 and 80:
cannabis, especially among adolesce
- Page 81 and 82:
Map 5-4: Number of all treatment de
- Page 83 and 84:
Figure 5-8: Selected characteristic
- Page 85 and 86:
5.3.3.2 Clients in Opiate Substitut
- Page 87 and 88:
Figure 5-10: Trends in the capacity
- Page 89 and 90:
Table 5-23: Number of hospitalisati
- Page 91 and 92:
Table 6-1: Number of newly detected
- Page 93 and 94:
Figure 6-5: Reported incidence of s
- Page 95 and 96:
The monitoring of testing for infec
- Page 97 and 98:
Table 6-8: Results of testing for H
- Page 99 and 100:
Table 6-9: Sharing of needles and s
- Page 101 and 102:
tests for cannabis; see Table 6-12.
- Page 103 and 104:
Pervitin was the cause of a fatal o
- Page 105 and 106:
Table 6-15: Deaths with the presenc
- Page 107 and 108:
Table 6-17: Fatal drug overdoses in
- Page 109 and 110:
Figure 6-13: Comparison of trends i
- Page 111 and 112:
7 Responses to Health Correlates an
- Page 113 and 114:
Table 7-2: Selected services of low
- Page 115 and 116:
Map 7-2: Number of needles and syri
- Page 117 and 118:
Table 7-8: History of HBV, HCV, and
- Page 119 and 120:
8 Social Correlates and Social Rein
- Page 121 and 122:
Altogether, 987 clients (610 of the
- Page 123 and 124:
9 Drug-Related Crime, Prevention of
- Page 125 and 126:
Table 9-2: Number of persons arrest
- Page 127 and 128:
Figure 9-1: Total number of persons
- Page 129 and 130:
Table 9-7: Sentences and other meas
- Page 131 and 132:
Table 9-9: Drug-related misdemeanou
- Page 133 and 134:
in custody, and 8 being the inmates
- Page 135 and 136:
(approximately 0.5%). However, only
- Page 137 and 138:
Table 9-15: NGOs providing drug ser
- Page 139 and 140:
Supported by the National Focal Poi
- Page 141 and 142:
was rather bizarre. For example, th
- Page 143 and 144:
shut down by the authorities. The l
- Page 145 and 146:
the regional police headquarters on
- Page 147 and 148:
conduct research in the area of pen
- Page 149 and 150:
Republic for the Period 2011-2012 f
- Page 151 and 152:
departments) or by the external pro
- Page 153 and 154:
more than 10 clients, etc. This is
- Page 155 and 156:
12 Drug Users with Children The aim
- Page 157 and 158:
Childbirth and the National Registe
- Page 159 and 160:
Table 12-2: Total number of mothers
- Page 161 and 162:
(diagnostic institutions), and reha
- Page 163 and 164:
12.3.2 Helping Services Help to chi
- Page 165 and 166:
13 Cross-border Travel, Drug Use, a
- Page 167 and 168:
ethnic minorities in the Czech Repu
- Page 169 and 170:
LIST OF TABLES Table 1-1: Overview
- Page 171 and 172:
Table 9-10: Criminal offences commi
- Page 173 and 174:
SELECTED DRUG-RELATED WEB PAGES ON
- Page 175 and 176:
2005-2009 National Strategy - Natio
- Page 177 and 178:
ministry, 18, 41, 42, 115 ministry
- Page 179 and 180:
Generální ředitelství Vězeňsk
- Page 181 and 182:
Mravčík, V., Zábranský, T., Kor
- Page 183 and 184:
Policie ČR (2011) Statistické př
- Page 185 and 186:
Van den Berg, C., Smit, C., Van Bru