06.02.2015 Views

The Czech Republic Annual Report 2010 Drug ... - Drogy-info.cz

The Czech Republic Annual Report 2010 Drug ... - Drogy-info.cz

The Czech Republic Annual Report 2010 Drug ... - Drogy-info.cz

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

egard to the year-on-year overlap of confidence intervals, there was a statistically significant decrease in the<br />

estimated total number of problem heroin users and an increase in the number of problem pervitin users. An<br />

overview of statistical significance of the changes in the estimated total number of problem drug users is provided in<br />

Figure 4-1 – there has been overlap in the confidence intervals of estimates from past years, meaning that the trend<br />

observed in mean estimate values must be interpreted with caution.<br />

Table 4-1: Mean values of prevalence estimates of problem drug use carried out using the multiplication method with the<br />

use of data from low-threshold programmes in 2002–<strong>2010</strong> (Mravčík et al. <strong>2010</strong>; Národní monitorovací středisko pro<br />

drogy a drogové závislosti, 2011d)<br />

Year<br />

Problem drug<br />

users in total<br />

Number<br />

Per 1,000<br />

people<br />

aged 15–<br />

64<br />

Problem users of opiates/opioids<br />

Heroin<br />

users<br />

Subutex ®<br />

users<br />

Total<br />

Total per<br />

1,000<br />

people<br />

aged 15–<br />

64<br />

Problem users<br />

of pervitin<br />

Number<br />

Per 1,000<br />

people<br />

aged 15–<br />

64<br />

Injecting drug<br />

users<br />

Number<br />

Per 1,000<br />

people<br />

aged 15–<br />

64<br />

2002 35,100 4.89 n.a. n.a. 13,300 1.85 21,800 3.04 31,700 4.41<br />

2003 29,000 4.02 n.a. n.a. 10,200 1.41 18,800 2.61 27,800 3.86<br />

2004 30,000 4.14 n.a. n.a. 9,700 1.34 20,300 2.80 27,000 3.73<br />

2005 31,800 4.37 n.a. n.a. 11,300 1.55 20,500 2.82 29,800 4.10<br />

2006 30,200 4.13 6,200 4,300 10,500 1.44 19,700 2.69 29,000 3.97<br />

2007 30,900 4.20 5,750 4,250 10,000 1.36 20,900 2.84 29,500 4.01<br />

2008 32,500 4.39 6,400 4,900 11,300 1.52 21,200 2.87 31,200 4.21<br />

2009 37,400 5.04 7,100 5,100 12,100 1.63 25,300 3.40 35,300 4.75<br />

<strong>2010</strong> 39,200 5.30 6,000 5,000 11,000 1.48 28,200 3.81 37,200 5.03<br />

Figure 4-1: Mean values and 95% confidence intervals of prevalence estimates of problem drug use carried out using the<br />

multiplication method with the use of data from low-threshold programmes in 2002–<strong>2010</strong> (Mravčík et al. <strong>2010</strong>; Národní<br />

monitorovací středisko pro drogy a drogové závislosti, 2011d)<br />

<strong>The</strong> highest number of problem drug users was traditionally estimated in Prague and the Ústí nad Labem region, i.e.<br />

in the areas that concurrently have the highest number of problem opiate users. In <strong>2010</strong>, Prague had the highest<br />

estimated number of both opiate users and pervitin users. Prevalence estimates of problem drug use by region are<br />

shown in Table 4-2 and Map 4-1.<br />

page 49

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!