08.02.2015 Views

The Australian Government's Innovation Report

The Australian Government's Innovation Report

The Australian Government's Innovation Report

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Conclusions<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Innovation</strong> Scorecard 2006 provides a snapshot of Australia’s innovation performance relative to other<br />

OECD economies. Being third in the series, it is also possible in some instances to look at Australia’s performance<br />

over time.<br />

Australia improved its performance between the 2004 and 2006 scorecards in nine of the 14 common indicators<br />

and decreased in five. Increases were spread over most of the categories of innovation covered by the scorecard<br />

with the greatest increases being in broadband subscribers and internet usage, two knowledge diffusion<br />

indicators, and in science graduates per 100 000 in the workforce aged 25-34, a human resources indicator.<br />

Substantial increases also occurred in the number of scientific and technical articles per million of the population<br />

and in both business and public R&D expenditures, all of which are knowledge creation indicators. <strong>The</strong>re<br />

were also increases in the percentage of the labour force with tertiary education, number of researchers, both human<br />

resources indicators, and the breadth of international science and engineering collaboration, which is a collaboration<br />

indicator. Australia’s performance decreased in investment in new equipment and investment in ICT, two knowledge<br />

diffusion indicators, average annual multifactor productivity growth, an indicator of market outcomes and in<br />

investment in venture capital, a finance indicator.<br />

Over half of the 14 indicators improved in each of the scorecards since 2002. <strong>The</strong> most notable was broadband<br />

subscribers per one thousand of the population, which showed a substantial increase in both the 2004-2006<br />

and the earlier 2002-2004 period.<br />

Compared to the OECD average in the 2006 scorecard, Australia ranked among the top 10 OECD countries<br />

in 12 out of the 18 indicators, performing above the average in 14 indicators and below in four. Australia<br />

performed well above the average in a number of areas, including investment in venture capital as a percentage<br />

of GDP, science and technical articles per million of the population, science graduates, broadband subscribers,<br />

innovating businesses with collaboration activity and businesses selling over the internet. Australia was below<br />

the average in four areas, most notably in the number of US patents per million of the population and<br />

innovation turnover as a percentage of sales. However, in some areas where Australia’s performance is below<br />

the OECD average, our performance relative to the OECD average and OECD ranking has improved in the<br />

2006 scorecard compared to the 2004 scorecard.<br />

Overall, the <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Innovation</strong> Scorecard 2006 shows that Australia’s innovation performance has been steadily<br />

improving in many areas and compares favourably with the OECD averages. This bodes well for Australia’s<br />

ability to capitalise on innovative people, processes and technologies.<br />

142 Backing Australia’s Ability

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!