2012 - Washington Red Raspberry Commission

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Procedures: • We have all publically-funded red raspberry breeders in the US involved in this project. They will make red raspberry crosses, grow the progeny in WA, NY and NC, and observe them for phenotypic characteristics. • We have also assembled a team of molecular biologists who will sequence DNA from those red raspberry crosses and identify markers for specific traits (e.g., RBDV resistance, heat tolerance, aphid resistance, etc.) based on phenotypic information supplied by the breeders. • Our consumer team will use commercial sources for red raspberry fruit in order to set up regional taste panels, design and implement national surveys, and, with the economic team, set up regional fruit auctions to determine the price consumers would pay for fruit with the flavor, texture or nutraceutical benefits they most favor. • If successful with securing USDA-SCRI funding, we expect to begin the project in July 2013 and continue until the grant end date of December 31, 2018. Seedlings will go to propagation in July 2013, then into phenotype testing during 2014 - 2018. Sequencing will begin in early 2014 and be followed by gene mapping which will continue through 2018. Consumer/Economic work will begin in July 2013 and continue until 2018. Anticipated Benefits and Information Transfer: (100 words maximum) • Growers in regional markets who are facing replanting and other fruit marketing decisions will have access to information about fruit characteristics that consumers in their region want. • This work will lead to a shorter average release time for new PNW cultivars. • Information derived from these grant activities will be shared with the industry through specific advisory board members, field days, meeting seminars, newsletters, etc. 017
Budget: Indirect or overhead costs are not allowed unless specifically authorized by the Board 2013 2014 2015 Salaries 1/ $ $ $ Time-Slip $1,000 $ $ Operations (goods & $ $ $ services) Travel 2/ $ $ $ Meetings $ $ $ Other $ $ $ Equipment 3/ $ $ $ Benefits 4/ $ $ $ Total $ $ $ Budget Justification 1/ Specify type of position and FTE. 2/ Provide brief justification for travel requested. All travel must directly benefit project. Travel for professional development should come from other sources. If you request travel to meetings, state how it benefits project. 3/ Justify equipment funding requests. Indicate what you plan to buy, how the equipment will be used, and how the purchase will benefit the growers. Include attempt to work cooperatively with others on equipment use and purchase. 4/ Included here are tuition, medical aid, and health insurance for Graduate Research Assistants, as well as regular benefits for salaries and time-slip employees. (See attached sheet for GRA rates, which is based on latest OGRD matrix for assistantships.) 018
Page 1 and 2: 2013 Research Proposals and 2012 Re
Page 3 and 4: Table of Contents Primary Investiga
Page 5 and 6: 2012 WASHINGTON RED RASPBERRY COMMI
Page 7 and 8: ut the effect was short lived (Pink
Page 9 and 10: Privѐ, J., J.A. Sullivan, and J.T.
Page 11 and 12: Corbin, A Benedict, C Cogger, C Bar
Page 15 and 16: Budget: Indirect or overhead costs
Page 17: Justification and Background: In 20
Page 21 and 22: 2012 PROGRESS REPORT Title: Red Ras
Page 23 and 24: than most other varieties but are s
Page 25 and 26: Table 1. Yield and fruit weight of
Page 27 and 28: Table 3. Harvest data for hand-harv
Page 29 and 30: Table 5. Susceptibility (S) and res
Page 31 and 32: identifying new, unbroken sources o
Page 35 and 36: tested rigorously over a period of
Page 37 and 38: Other funding sources: All amounts
Page 41 and 42: We will collect large quantities of
Page 43 and 44: Current & Pending Support NAME (Lis
Page 45 and 46: Appendices Table RY1. Red raspberry
Page 47 and 48: Table RY3. Mean yield and berry siz
Page 49 and 50: Table RY5. Mean yield and berry siz
Page 51 and 52: 8 Table RY8. Ripening season for pr
Page 53 and 54: - Cultivars for the Pacific Northwe
Page 55 and 56: Current & Pending Support Chad Finn
Page 57 and 58: Washington Red Raspberry Commission
Page 59 and 60: Title of project: Support of SCRI P
Page 61 and 62: We will develop markers that will b
Page 63 and 64: the operations amenable to and desi
Page 65 and 66: Budget: Indirect or overhead costs
Page 67 and 68: Current & Pending Support-Tarara In
Page 69 and 70:
Table 1. Primocane injury and weed
Page 71 and 72:
Importantly, floricane injury and b
Page 73 and 74:
2013 WASHINGTON RED RASPBERRY COMMI
Page 75 and 76:
density. The roots and shoots are s
Page 77 and 78:
Name (List PI #1 first) Moore, P.P.
Page 79 and 80:
Publications/Presentations: July 18
Page 81 and 82:
Table 2. 2011 and 2012 harvest of 2
Page 83 and 84:
PROJECT: 13C-3755-5641 TITLE: Red R
Page 85 and 86:
PROPOSED BUDGET: Funds from the Nor
Page 87 and 88:
Washington Red Raspberry Commission
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
• Maximum number of plants per se
Page 93 and 94:
Project Title: Fungicide Resistance
Page 95 and 96:
society’s/the environment’s bes
Page 97 and 98:
aged, contact/ingestion residues fo
Page 99 and 100:
Table 3. Clay color weevil topical
Page 101 and 102:
Project No.: New Title: Management
Page 103 and 104:
growers in the Lynden area that hav
Page 105 and 106:
Application Date: November 13, 2012
Page 107 and 108:
particular inoculum levels are asso
Page 109 and 110:
References: Berkeley, G. H. and Jac
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
technical bulletin states “For pe
Page 115:
Budget: 2013 2014 Salaries $0 $0 Ad
show all

2012 - Washington Red Raspberry Commission

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?