2012 - Washington Red Raspberry Commission

More documents

Recommendations

Info

learn will be useful for the project “Roadmap Development for U.S. <strong>Raspberry</strong> Producers: Forging Links Between New Tools for Breeding Programs and Crop Markets” that was successfully submitted as a planning grant and the full project that they will submit one year from now. Relationship to WRRC Research priority(s): Our objectives for raspberry breeding most closely align with a #1 <strong>Commission</strong> Priority as we are trying to develop cultivars “that are summer bearing high-yielding, winter hardy, machine harvestable, disease and virus resistant and have superior processed fruit quality. The traits we identify and the tools we develop will be useful in developing improved red raspberry cultivars. Objectives: The overall goal of this proposal is to develop and make available genomic tools for the improvement of black and red raspberry (Rubus occidentalis, and R. idaeus, respectively, subgenus Idaeobatus) and begin the application of these tools in using wild black raspberry germplasm for crop improvement. Specifically: 1) Transcriptome sequencing and high throughput genomic sequencing. 2) Developing molecular markers from genomic and EST sequences. 3) Studying genotype by environment interaction on specific traits of interest in crosses involving diverse wild black raspberry germplasm. 4) Using molecular markers for mapping specific traits of interest in crosses involving diverse wild black raspberry germplasm. 5) Evaluate transferability of SSR markers developed in black raspberry to red raspberry. 6) Better understanding of consumer preferences for market expansion. 7) Delivering research results and training in molecular breeding to the industry, breeders, and students through a multifaceted outreach program. Procedures (
We will develop markers that will be useful in marker assisted red and black raspberry breeding. This will hopefully open up new opportunities and sources of variability for developing improved red and black raspberry cultivars. Budget: For each year 2011-2015 Salaries: Student labor (GS-2) $1,000 Total per year $1,000 Total for 2011-2015 $5,000 060
Page 1 and 2:
2013 Research Proposals and 2012 Re
Page 3 and 4:
Table of Contents Primary Investiga
Page 5 and 6:
2012 WASHINGTON RED RASPBERRY COMMI
Page 7 and 8:
ut the effect was short lived (Pink
Page 9 and 10: Privѐ, J., J.A. Sullivan, and J.T.
Page 11 and 12: Corbin, A Benedict, C Cogger, C Bar
Page 13 and 14: 2013 WASHINGTON RED RASPBERRY COMMI
Page 15 and 16: Budget: Indirect or overhead costs
Page 17 and 18: Justification and Background: In 20
Page 21 and 22: 2012 PROGRESS REPORT Title: Red Ras
Page 23 and 24: than most other varieties but are s
Page 25 and 26: Table 1. Yield and fruit weight of
Page 27 and 28: Table 3. Harvest data for hand-harv
Page 29 and 30: Table 5. Susceptibility (S) and res
Page 31 and 32: identifying new, unbroken sources o
Page 35 and 36: tested rigorously over a period of
Page 37 and 38: Other funding sources: All amounts
Page 41 and 42: We will collect large quantities of
Page 43 and 44: Current & Pending Support NAME (Lis
Page 45 and 46: Appendices Table RY1. Red raspberry
Page 47 and 48: Table RY3. Mean yield and berry siz
Page 49 and 50: Table RY5. Mean yield and berry siz
Page 51 and 52: 8 Table RY8. Ripening season for pr
Page 53 and 54: - Cultivars for the Pacific Northwe
Page 55 and 56: Current & Pending Support Chad Finn
Page 57 and 58: Washington Red Raspberry Commission
Page 59: Title of project: Support of SCRI P
Page 63 and 64: the operations amenable to and desi
Page 67 and 68: Current & Pending Support-Tarara In
Page 69 and 70: Table 1. Primocane injury and weed
Page 71 and 72: Importantly, floricane injury and b
Page 75 and 76: density. The roots and shoots are s
Page 77 and 78: Name (List PI #1 first) Moore, P.P.
Page 79 and 80: Publications/Presentations: July 18
Page 81 and 82: Table 2. 2011 and 2012 harvest of 2
Page 83 and 84: PROJECT: 13C-3755-5641 TITLE: Red R
Page 85 and 86: PROPOSED BUDGET: Funds from the Nor
Page 87 and 88: Washington Red Raspberry Commission
Page 91 and 92: • Maximum number of plants per se
Page 93 and 94: Project Title: Fungicide Resistance
Page 95 and 96: society’s/the environment’s bes
Page 97 and 98: aged, contact/ingestion residues fo
Page 99 and 100: Table 3. Clay color weevil topical
Page 101 and 102: Project No.: New Title: Management
Page 103 and 104: growers in the Lynden area that hav
Page 105 and 106: Application Date: November 13, 2012
Page 107 and 108: particular inoculum levels are asso
Page 109 and 110: References: Berkeley, G. H. and Jac
Page 111 and 112:
2013 WASHINGTON RED RASPBERRY COMMI
Page 113 and 114:
technical bulletin states “For pe
Page 115:
Budget: 2013 2014 Salaries $0 $0 Ad
show all

2012 - Washington Red Raspberry Commission

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?