2012 - Washington Red Raspberry Commission

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Current & Pending Support Instructions: 1. Record information for active and pending projects. 2. All current research to which principal investigator(s) and other senior personnel have committed a portion of their time must be listed whether or not salary for the person(s) involved is included in the budgets of the various projects. 3. Provide analogous information for all proposed research which is being considered by, or which will be submitted in the near future to, other possible sponsors. Name (List PI #1 first) Supporting Agency and Project # Total $ Amount Effective and Expiration Dates % of Time Committed Title of Project Chaim Kempler Current: AAFC, RIDC, WRRC, LMHIA AAFC, BCBC, LMHIA AAFC, WSC, FVSGA, LMHIA $321,281 $183,589 $150,805 April 1 2010 – March 31, 2013 April 1 2010 – March 31, 2013 April 1 2010 – March 31, 2013 49% 28% 23% Red Raspberry Breeding for the Pacific Northwest Blueberry Breeding for the Pacific Northwest Strawberry Breeding for the Pacific Northwest Michael Dossett Pending: AAFC, WWRC, RIDC, BCBC AAFC, BCBC, WBC AAFC, WSC, FVSGA, BCBC $801,266 $641,012 $160,253 April 1, 2013 – March 31, 2018 April 1, 2013 – March 31, 2018 April 1, 2013 – March 31, 2018 50% 40% 10% Red Raspberry Breeding for the Pacific Northwest Blueberry Breeding for the Pacific Northwest Evaluating Strawberry Cultivars and Germplasm for BC and Northern Washington 031
2013 WASHINGTON RED RASPBERRY COMMISSION RESEARCH PROPOSAL New Project Proposal Proposed Duration: (3 years) Project Title: Red Raspberry Cultivar Development PI: Michael Dossett Organization: Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Title: Visiting Fellow Phone: (604) 796-2221 ext. 1284 Email: Michael.Dossett@agr.gc.ca Address: 6947 Hwy #7 Address 2: City/State/Zip: Agassiz, BC V0M 1A0 Cooperators: Pat Moore, WSU Puyallup Chad Finn, USDA-ARS, Corvallis Nahla Bassil, USDA-ARS, Corvallis Tom Forge, Nematology/Plant Pathology AAFC Andrew Jamieson, Berry Breeder AAFC Kentville NS Year Initiated 2013 Current Year 2013 Terminating Year 2015 Total Project Request: Year 1 $12000 Year 2 $12000 Year 3 $12000 Other funding sources: This is part of a larger project to support berry breeding in British Columbia in the near term until longer-term solutions can be found after the program was cut by the federal government in 2012. While we are still awaiting details of the DIAP 2 funding program from Ottawa, we are planning for a total budget for running the program of $304,696 in 2013 increasing to approximately $320,288 in 2015. We have been told that the DIAP2 program will require 1:1 matching funds so half of the money budgeted must be put forward by industry. We expect that the program will be split as follows: 50% red raspberry, 40% blueberry, 10% strawberry. WRRC contribution would be leveraged 1:1 with federal matching funds and go towards the red raspberry portion ($76,174 industry funds needed in 2013). I have broken down the amounts requested from all funding sources on a separate page at the end of this proposal. Description: This project is to support the continued effort to breed raspberry cultivars adapted to the PNW. Chemical pest control measures are becoming increasingly unavailable, making genetic resistance and tolerance more important. Breeding for resistance, yield, and fruit quality is the most sustainable way to address industry needs and ensure long-term competitiveness. We will continue to cross and select from a diverse gene pool and evaluate previous selections with the following specific objectives: • Develop red raspberry cultivars and elite germplasm, stressing suitability for machine harvest, fruit quality, as well as resistance to root rot, RBDV and other diseases • Develop red raspberry cultivars and elite germplasm manageable plant habit that is suitable for machine harvesting and produces high yields of superior fruit quality and fruit rot resistance. 032
Page 1 and 2: 2013 Research Proposals and 2012 Re
Page 3 and 4: Table of Contents Primary Investiga
Page 5 and 6: 2012 WASHINGTON RED RASPBERRY COMMI
Page 7 and 8: ut the effect was short lived (Pink
Page 9 and 10: Privѐ, J., J.A. Sullivan, and J.T.
Page 11 and 12: Corbin, A Benedict, C Cogger, C Bar
Page 15 and 16: Budget: Indirect or overhead costs
Page 17 and 18: Justification and Background: In 20
Page 21 and 22: 2012 PROGRESS REPORT Title: Red Ras
Page 23 and 24: than most other varieties but are s
Page 25 and 26: Table 1. Yield and fruit weight of
Page 27 and 28: Table 3. Harvest data for hand-harv
Page 29 and 30: Table 5. Susceptibility (S) and res
Page 31: identifying new, unbroken sources o
Page 35 and 36: tested rigorously over a period of
Page 37 and 38: Other funding sources: All amounts
Page 41 and 42: We will collect large quantities of
Page 43 and 44: Current & Pending Support NAME (Lis
Page 45 and 46: Appendices Table RY1. Red raspberry
Page 47 and 48: Table RY3. Mean yield and berry siz
Page 49 and 50: Table RY5. Mean yield and berry siz
Page 51 and 52: 8 Table RY8. Ripening season for pr
Page 53 and 54: - Cultivars for the Pacific Northwe
Page 55 and 56: Current & Pending Support Chad Finn
Page 57 and 58: Washington Red Raspberry Commission
Page 59 and 60: Title of project: Support of SCRI P
Page 61 and 62: We will develop markers that will b
Page 63 and 64: the operations amenable to and desi
Page 67 and 68: Current & Pending Support-Tarara In
Page 69 and 70: Table 1. Primocane injury and weed
Page 71 and 72: Importantly, floricane injury and b
Page 75 and 76: density. The roots and shoots are s
Page 77 and 78: Name (List PI #1 first) Moore, P.P.
Page 79 and 80: Publications/Presentations: July 18
Page 81 and 82: Table 2. 2011 and 2012 harvest of 2
Page 83 and 84:
PROJECT: 13C-3755-5641 TITLE: Red R
Page 85 and 86:
PROPOSED BUDGET: Funds from the Nor
Page 87 and 88:
Washington Red Raspberry Commission
Page 89 and 90:
2013 WASHINGTON RED RASPBERRY COMMI
Page 91 and 92:
• Maximum number of plants per se
Page 93 and 94:
Project Title: Fungicide Resistance
Page 95 and 96:
society’s/the environment’s bes
Page 97 and 98:
aged, contact/ingestion residues fo
Page 99 and 100:
Table 3. Clay color weevil topical
Page 101 and 102:
Project No.: New Title: Management
Page 103 and 104:
growers in the Lynden area that hav
Page 105 and 106:
Application Date: November 13, 2012
Page 107 and 108:
particular inoculum levels are asso
Page 109 and 110:
References: Berkeley, G. H. and Jac
Page 111 and 112:
2013 WASHINGTON RED RASPBERRY COMMI
Page 113 and 114:
technical bulletin states “For pe
Page 115:
Budget: 2013 2014 Salaries $0 $0 Ad
show all

2012 - Washington Red Raspberry Commission

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?