2012 - Washington Red Raspberry Commission

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Name (List PI #1 first) Moore, P.P. and Hoashi- Erhardt Moore, P.P. and Hoashi- Erhardt Moore, P.P. and Hoashi- Erhardt Moore, PP, Weiland, Hoashi- Erhardt Moore, P.P. and Hoashi- Erhardt Moore, P.P. and Hoashi- Erhardt Name (List PI #1 first) Moore, P.P. and Hoashi- Erhardt Moore, PP, Weiland, Hoashi-Erhardt Moore, P.P. and Hoashi- Erhardt Supporting Agency and Project # Northwest Center for Small Fruit Research Washington Red Raspberry Commission Washington Strawberry Commission USDA, Crop Germplasm Committee Oregon Strawberry Commission Organic Farming Research Foundation Supporting Agency and Project # Washington Red Raspberry Commission Washington Red Raspberry Commission Washington Strawberry Commission Current Support Total $ Amount Effective and Expiration Dates Title of Project $138,424 2012-2014 Small Fruit Breeding in the Pacific Northwest $65,000 2012-2013 Red Raspberry Breeding, Genetics and Clone Evaluation $17,100 2012-2013 Genetic Improvement of Strawberry $10,000 2012-2014 Evaluation of resistance to Verticillium dahliae and Phytophthora rubi in red raspberry $4,000 2012-2013 Genetic Improvement of Strawberry $38,053 2012-2014 Breeding day-neutral strawberry cultivars for organic production in the Pacific Northwest Pending Support Total $ Amount Effective and Expiration Dates Title of Project $68,000 2013-2014 Red Raspberry Breeding, Genetics and Clone Evaluation $8,598 2013-2014 Evaluation of resistance to Verticillium dahliae and Phytophthora rubi in red raspberry $37,000 2013-2014 Genetic Improvement of Strawberry 085
Washington Red Raspberry Commission Progress Report Format for 2012 Projects Title: Regional On-farm Trials of Advanced Raspberry Selections Personnel: PI: Tom Peerbolt –Peerbolt Crop Management Co PIs: Chad Finn – USDA-ARS; Pat Moore – WSU; Julie Enfield – Northwest Plants Reporting Period: 2012 Accomplishments: Advanced selections/varieties planted in 2012: WSU 1507, WSU 1912, WSU 1948, Rudi. Participating propagators & what they provided (materials paid for by the commission): • North American Plants: WSU 1912—1050 TC plants, WSU 1948—950 TC plants • Northwest Plants/Enfield Farms: WSU 1507—775 TC plants, Rudi—800 TC plants • Norcal Nursery (Sakuma Bros.): Rudi—325 bare root plants. Participating growers & selections in their trials: • Ralph Minaker (225 of each) : WSU 1507, WSU 1912, WSU 1948, Rudi (bare root) • Enfield Farms (250 of each): WSU 1507, WSU 1912, WSU 1948, Rudi (TC) • Sakuma Farms (200 of each) : WSU 1507, WSU 1912, WSU 1948 • George Hoffman (100 of each) : WSU 1507, WSU 1912, WSU 1948, Rudi (bare root) • Don Sturm Farm: WSU 1507(150 plants), WSU 1912 (275 TC plants) , WSU 1948 (175 TC plants) Regional distribution of trials • Ralph Minaker : Whatcom County, Everson area. • Enfield Farms: Whatcom County, West Lynden area. • Sakuma Farms: Skagit County, Mt. Vernon area. • George Hoffman: SW Washington, Clark County, Ridgefield area. • Don Sturm Farm: Corbett, OR. We had a plant surplus which were offered to Don. His location in the east Willamette valley and higher elevation offered a different environmental setting that the other sites. Results: • Establishing the framework, recruiting participants, getting the first plants in the ground. New 2012 on Farm plantings—Minaker farm and Enfield Farm Publications: none 086
Page 1 and 2:
2013 Research Proposals and 2012 Re
Page 3 and 4:
Table of Contents Primary Investiga
Page 5 and 6:
2012 WASHINGTON RED RASPBERRY COMMI
Page 7 and 8:
ut the effect was short lived (Pink
Page 9 and 10:
Privѐ, J., J.A. Sullivan, and J.T.
Page 11 and 12:
Corbin, A Benedict, C Cogger, C Bar
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Budget: Indirect or overhead costs
Page 17 and 18:
Justification and Background: In 20
Page 19 and 20:
Budget: Indirect or overhead costs
Page 21 and 22:
2012 PROGRESS REPORT Title: Red Ras
Page 23 and 24:
than most other varieties but are s
Page 25 and 26:
Table 1. Yield and fruit weight of
Page 27 and 28:
Table 3. Harvest data for hand-harv
Page 29 and 30:
Table 5. Susceptibility (S) and res
Page 31 and 32:
identifying new, unbroken sources o
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36: tested rigorously over a period of
Page 37 and 38: Other funding sources: All amounts
Page 39 and 40: 2013 WASHINGTON RED RASPBERRY COMMI
Page 41 and 42: We will collect large quantities of
Page 43 and 44: Current & Pending Support NAME (Lis
Page 45 and 46: Appendices Table RY1. Red raspberry
Page 47 and 48: Table RY3. Mean yield and berry siz
Page 49 and 50: Table RY5. Mean yield and berry siz
Page 51 and 52: 8 Table RY8. Ripening season for pr
Page 53 and 54: - Cultivars for the Pacific Northwe
Page 55 and 56: Current & Pending Support Chad Finn
Page 57 and 58: Washington Red Raspberry Commission
Page 59 and 60: Title of project: Support of SCRI P
Page 61 and 62: We will develop markers that will b
Page 63 and 64: the operations amenable to and desi
Page 65 and 66: Budget: Indirect or overhead costs
Page 67 and 68: Current & Pending Support-Tarara In
Page 69 and 70: Table 1. Primocane injury and weed
Page 71 and 72: Importantly, floricane injury and b
Page 75 and 76: density. The roots and shoots are s
Page 77 and 78: Name (List PI #1 first) Moore, P.P.
Page 79 and 80: Publications/Presentations: July 18
Page 81 and 82: Table 2. 2011 and 2012 harvest of 2
Page 83 and 84: PROJECT: 13C-3755-5641 TITLE: Red R
Page 85: PROPOSED BUDGET: Funds from the Nor
Page 91 and 92: • Maximum number of plants per se
Page 93 and 94: Project Title: Fungicide Resistance
Page 95 and 96: society’s/the environment’s bes
Page 97 and 98: aged, contact/ingestion residues fo
Page 99 and 100: Table 3. Clay color weevil topical
Page 101 and 102: Project No.: New Title: Management
Page 103 and 104: growers in the Lynden area that hav
Page 105 and 106: Application Date: November 13, 2012
Page 107 and 108: particular inoculum levels are asso
Page 109 and 110: References: Berkeley, G. H. and Jac
Page 113 and 114: technical bulletin states “For pe
Page 115: Budget: 2013 2014 Salaries $0 $0 Ad
show all

2012 - Washington Red Raspberry Commission

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?