08.02.2015 Views

2012 - Washington Red Raspberry Commission

2012 - Washington Red Raspberry Commission

2012 - Washington Red Raspberry Commission

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

society’s/the environment’s best interest to prevent the development of resistance.<br />

Development of resistance has been repeatedly shown to result in significantly increased use of<br />

pesticides.<br />

Description of alternative control measures and why they are not effective or additional<br />

information on the specific need. Growers currently engage in a number of alternative<br />

control tactics such as annually prune to remove infected twigs and to open canopy for good air<br />

circulation; space plants for good air circulation and quick drying; adjust timing and/or frequency<br />

of overhead irrigation to keep aboveground portions of the plant dry; avoid late-season<br />

fertilization; and, pick fruit at correct stage of maturity and move harvested fruit to cold storage<br />

as soon as possible. However even with these tactics, intensive fungicide use is necessary.<br />

Funding Categories. Category C - Significance to Local or Regional Economy<br />

II. Resistance management<br />

IV. Registration of an additional pest control tactic<br />

Project Description. Objective 1. Sample Botrytis infections in berry fields in western<br />

<strong>Washington</strong> and screen for tolerance. Objective 2. Use information to revise Botrytis berry<br />

control programs.<br />

We propose to use local crop advisors, growers/industry representatives to collect raspberry<br />

(June/July) and blueberry (July/August/September) Botrytis infected fruit. The samples will be<br />

shipped to Jim Adaskavig (UC Davis) who has agreed to test the fruit for tolerance to berry<br />

fungicides. Counties to be sampled include Clark, Lewis, Thurston, King, Skagit and Whatcom.<br />

Other counties could be included, but the aforementioned were selected due to their large berry<br />

acreage or knowledge of good cooperators. While blueberries and raspberries are the target of<br />

this project, berry growers also grow strawberries which have very similar problems. It is<br />

expected that a few strawberry samples would be collected and submitted. Our goal is to<br />

submit 200 samples of fruit. It is easy to find infected fruit, but we hope to find Botrytis on plants<br />

early in the season and test it for resistance. If resistance can be documented early enough,<br />

then it may be possible to use this information for a Section 18. While this is a possibility, it is<br />

premature to create the expectation that this will happen.<br />

Budget<br />

Expenditure<br />

WSCPR<br />

(Request)<br />

Co-funding (CASH or IN-KIND)<br />

Source: WBC Source:WRRC Source:WBC<br />

Amount<br />

Amount<br />

Amount<br />

(CASH)<br />

(CASH)<br />

(in-kind)<br />

Salaries1<br />

Employee Benefits<br />

Samplers/Shipping 5,000 1,000 1,000 7,000<br />

Travel2<br />

Basic supplies 300 300<br />

UC Davis 2,000 2,000 4,000<br />

Total 5,000 3,000 3,000 300 11,300<br />

TOTAL<br />

COST<br />

We plan to contract with local field reps/crop advisors to collect the fruit (including Tom Peerbolt for SW <strong>Washington</strong>, Whatcom<br />

County Farmers Coop, etc. in Whatcom County, etc.). Schreiber will collect samples for Thurston, King and Skagit counties.\<br />

$4,000 will be provided to U.C. Davis for the sample evaluations.<br />

Has this budget been reviewed for accuracy Yes By Whom Stacey Hill<br />

094

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!