2012 - Washington Red Raspberry Commission

More documents

Recommendations

Info

PROJECT TITLE Developing the Genomic Infrastructure for Breeding Improved Black Raspberries 2013 WRRC Production Research Budget Worksheet RESEARCHER (S) REQUEST of WRRC Other Sources WSCPR Applied Total Project WRRC Approved WRRC % Finn $1,000 $52,506 $53,506 2% Cooperative raspberry cultivar development Finn $6,500 $3,000 $9,500 68% Red Raspberry Breeding Moore $68,000 $138,424 $206,424 33% Red Raspberry Cultivar Development Dossett $12,000 $64,174 $76,174 16% Evaluating the Feasibility of Coordinated Regional onfarm Trials of Advanced Raspberry Selections Peerbolt $11,200 $11,200 100% Connecting Raspberry Breeding Programs to Crop Markets through Use of Molecular, Economic and Daniels $1,000 $2,800,000 $2,801,000 0% Consumer Science Tools Evaluation of resistance to Verticillium dahliae and Phytophthora rubi in red raspberry Moore Weiland $6,772 $10,000 $16,772 40% Incidence and Detection of Verticillium dahliae in Red Raspberry Production Fields Weiland Benedict $13,582 $13,582 100% Chemical control of spotted wing drosophila and spider mite Tanigoshi $9,921 $7,904 $17,825 56% Trap and bait testing for SWD in Northwest Washington Raspberries Burrows $4,934 $4,934 $9,868 50% Perennial Weed Control Miller $4,595 $4,250 $8,845 52% Strategies to Control Nematodes Elling $7,457 $317,424 $324,881 2% Fine-tuning Vydate applications in red raspberry for Pratylenchus penetrans control Zasada Walters $10,447 $5,840 $16,287 64% Red Raspberry trellising demonstration plot for development of automation technologies Karkee Tarara $11,451 $11,451 100% Integration of Factors to Improve Soil Health in Red Raspberry Production Benedict $10,736 $125,306 $136,042 8% Fungicide Resistance in Botrytis in WA Berries Schreiber $3,000 $3,300 $5,000 $11,300 27% Future Projects $0 Total Production Research $182,595 $3,524,908 $17,154 $3,724,657 $0 Research Related WRRC expenses $5,000 $5,000 $5,000 Small Fruit Center fee $2,500 $2,500 $2,500 TOTAL $190,095 $3,524,908 $17,154 $3,732,157 $7,500 2013 Proposed Research Budget $135,000 003
2012 WASHINGTON RED RASPBERRY COMMISSION PROGRESS REPORT Project No: 13C-4127-1260 Title: Integration of Factors to Improve Soil Health in Red Raspberry Production Personnel: Principal Investigator Chris Benedict, WSU Whatcom County Extension Agriculture Extension Educator 1000 N. Forest St. Suite 201, Bellingham, WA, 98225. (360) 676-6736 chrisbenedict@wsu.edu Reporting Period: 1/1/12-12/31/12 Co-PI and/or cooperator(s) Colleen Burrows, WSU Whatcom County Extension, Agriculture Special Projects Coordinator 1000 N. Forest St. Suite 201, Bellingham, WA, 98225. (360) 676-6736 cburrows@wsu.edu Accomplishments: The first year of this project was to initiate treatments, setup monitoring equipment, and capture baseline soil-health and horticultural data. Plant health was captured through primocane diameter measurements (Spring 2012) and visual assessments throughout the year (Spring, Summer, Early-Fall 2012). Soil health was evaluated through physical (texturization), biological (nematode/soil-pathogen quantification and soil biota community assemblage characterization), and chemical (soil nutrient levels) analysis. These measurements give us a starting point for reference for future years when a similar suite of analysis will be performed. This information contributes to the industry’s knowledge-base and the larger scientific community by quantifying soil-pathogen levels and within-field geospatial distribution. Results: To date soil texturization, soilborne pathogens (i.e. V. dahliae), soil biota community assemblage, soil nutrient analysis, horticultural measurements, and SPAD meter readings have been compiled. Lab analysis of soilborne pathogens (i.e. nematode, P. rubi,) and foliar nutrient content (to be correlated to SPAD readings) have not been finalized. A set of tensiometer-driven irrigation lines were installed that shut-offs at desired soil moisture levels. After getting through some installation “speed bumps” the tensiometer driven irrigation system reduced water use by 30% at one site and 23% at the other when compared to timed-based irrigation. Cover crop screens have identified two spring planted cover crops that can easily be used in raspberry production, withstand harvest operations, and provide little crop competition. Publications: We are in the process of developing an in-depth written report for the December issue of Whatcom Ag Monthly. Additionally interactive web space is being developed that will be posted before the Small Fruit Conference that will allow information to be available in real-time to interested producers, industry support personnel, and researchers. Result from the SPAD metering will be developed into a poster for the Small Fruit Conference and for a peer-reviewed scientific journal once lab work is completed. 004
Page 1 and 2: 2013 Research Proposals and 2012 Re
Page 3: Table of Contents Primary Investiga
Page 7 and 8: ut the effect was short lived (Pink
Page 9 and 10: Privѐ, J., J.A. Sullivan, and J.T.
Page 11 and 12: Corbin, A Benedict, C Cogger, C Bar
Page 13 and 14: 2013 WASHINGTON RED RASPBERRY COMMI
Page 15 and 16: Budget: Indirect or overhead costs
Page 17 and 18: Justification and Background: In 20
Page 19 and 20: Budget: Indirect or overhead costs
Page 21 and 22: 2012 PROGRESS REPORT Title: Red Ras
Page 23 and 24: than most other varieties but are s
Page 25 and 26: Table 1. Yield and fruit weight of
Page 27 and 28: Table 3. Harvest data for hand-harv
Page 29 and 30: Table 5. Susceptibility (S) and res
Page 31 and 32: identifying new, unbroken sources o
Page 35 and 36: tested rigorously over a period of
Page 37 and 38: Other funding sources: All amounts
Page 41 and 42: We will collect large quantities of
Page 43 and 44: Current & Pending Support NAME (Lis
Page 45 and 46: Appendices Table RY1. Red raspberry
Page 47 and 48: Table RY3. Mean yield and berry siz
Page 49 and 50: Table RY5. Mean yield and berry siz
Page 51 and 52: 8 Table RY8. Ripening season for pr
Page 53 and 54: - Cultivars for the Pacific Northwe
Page 55 and 56:
Current & Pending Support Chad Finn
Page 57 and 58:
Washington Red Raspberry Commission
Page 59 and 60:
Title of project: Support of SCRI P
Page 61 and 62:
We will develop markers that will b
Page 63 and 64:
the operations amenable to and desi
Page 65 and 66:
Budget: Indirect or overhead costs
Page 67 and 68:
Current & Pending Support-Tarara In
Page 69 and 70:
Table 1. Primocane injury and weed
Page 71 and 72:
Importantly, floricane injury and b
Page 73 and 74:
2013 WASHINGTON RED RASPBERRY COMMI
Page 75 and 76:
density. The roots and shoots are s
Page 77 and 78:
Name (List PI #1 first) Moore, P.P.
Page 79 and 80:
Publications/Presentations: July 18
Page 81 and 82:
Table 2. 2011 and 2012 harvest of 2
Page 83 and 84:
PROJECT: 13C-3755-5641 TITLE: Red R
Page 85 and 86:
PROPOSED BUDGET: Funds from the Nor
Page 87 and 88:
Washington Red Raspberry Commission
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
• Maximum number of plants per se
Page 93 and 94:
Project Title: Fungicide Resistance
Page 95 and 96:
society’s/the environment’s bes
Page 97 and 98:
aged, contact/ingestion residues fo
Page 99 and 100:
Table 3. Clay color weevil topical
Page 101 and 102:
Project No.: New Title: Management
Page 103 and 104:
growers in the Lynden area that hav
Page 105 and 106:
Application Date: November 13, 2012
Page 107 and 108:
particular inoculum levels are asso
Page 109 and 110:
References: Berkeley, G. H. and Jac
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
technical bulletin states “For pe
Page 115:
Budget: 2013 2014 Salaries $0 $0 Ad
show all

2012 - Washington Red Raspberry Commission

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?