2012 - Washington Red Raspberry Commission

Table 1. Yield and fruit weight of hand-harvested (in 2010 and 2011) and machine-harvested (2012) raspberry
cultivars and selections planted in 2008 in Abbotsford, BC.
Marketable yield
Machine Green
Total yield (kg/hill)
Fruit weight (g)
Clone
Reps
(tons/ac)
harvestable fruit
2010 2011 2012 2010 2011 2012 2010 2011 2012 yield (%) (g)
BC 1-16-8 3 -- z -- 3.81 -- -- 6.11 -- -- 3.3 -- 156
BC 1-17-1 3 4.00 -- 3.74 6.41 -- 6.00 4.8 -- 4.0 93.6 166
BC 1-88-6 3 4.18 3.30 1.72 6.69 5.29 2.76 4.7 4.4 3.6 46.1 197
BC 3-19-5 1 -- 3.13 2.46 -- 5.01 3.93 -- 3.3 3.3 78.5 71
BC 3-19-8 1 1.70 2.59 1.73 2.72 4.15 2.77 3.2 3.6 3.2 80.6 54
BC 4-13-46 3 2.40 2.56 2.81 3.84 4.11 4.49 4.3 4.0 4.4 113.0 191
BC 4-13-7 3 2.98 3.82 2.74 4.77 6.12 4.39 5.1 5.3 4.8 80.6 221
BC 4-22-91 1 2.67 3.82 1.95 4.28 6.12 3.12 2.9 3.7 2.7 60.1 142
BC 4-36-17 1 2.70 3.55 2.94 4.33 5.69 4.71 3.3 3.8 3.2 94.1 139
BC 4-4-11 1 2.68 2.32 1.54 4.30 3.72 2.47 4.6 5.2 4.3 61.6 317
BC 4-41-11 1 2.83 3.27 0.75 4.54 5.24 1.20 3.6 3.8 2.7 24.6 6
BC 4-41-58 1 -- 2.14 1.16 -- 3.43 1.86 -- 3.3 3.2 54.1 39
BC 4-41-6 1 -- 2.86 1.26 -- 4.59 2.01 -- 3.2 2.4 43.9 28
BC 4-41-8 2 4.39 3.70 1.61 7.03 5.93 2.58 4.2 4.2 3.4 39.8 110
BC 4-41-87 1 2.76 4.65 2.59 4.42 7.45 4.14 4.7 5.3 4.4 69.8 183
BC 4-42-59 3 3.54 4.33 2.09 5.67 6.93 3.35 4.2 4.7 3.6 53.2 125
BC 4-42-76 1 2.84 4.66 2.76 4.54 7.46 4.42 4.2 4.2 3.6 73.6 162
BC 4-46-59 1 3.18 2.13 2.23 5.09 3.41 3.57 3.9 4.0 3.4 83.8 94
BC 4-65-3 1 3.36 3.02 1.36 5.38 4.84 2.18 2.8 3.6 2.7 42.7 51
BC 4-66-16 1 2.62 2.25 0.72 4.20 3.60 1.15 3.9 4.2 3.5 29.6 30
BC 4-67-4 1 2.71 3.51 1.66 4.35 5.62 2.67 3.0 3.1 3.3 53.5 19
BC 4-93-2 3 3.56 3.95 2.81 5.70 6.33 4.51 5.1 5.5 4.6 74.9 235
BC 90-19-8 2 -- 3.25 1.84 -- 5.20 2.95 -- 3.7 3.2 56.8 38
BC 90-5-30 3 2.68 3.11 3.10 4.30 4.98 4.97 4.3 4.7 3.9 107.2 99
BC 92-5-47 2 3.05 2.26 1.39 4.89 3.63 2.23 4.2 3.6 3.0 52.3 34
BC 96-17R-45 1 2.54 3.85 2.03 4.07 6.17 3.25 3.8 4.1 3.3 63.5 202
C. Bounty 3 3.06 3.41 1.45 4.91 5.46 2.32 3.1 3.0 2.6 44.8 43
Chemainus 4 3.63 3.46 2.83 5.82 5.54 4.53 3.6 4.1 3.5 79.8 93
Jeanne d’Orleans 3 2.83 2.53 1.41 4.53 4.06 2.26 3.2 3.0 2.5 52.5 62
Malahat 3 3.14 3.46 1.65 5.02 5.54 2.64 4.0 4.2 3.4 50.0 28
Meeker 3 3.67 3.31 1.89 5.87 5.31 3.03 3.1 3.1 2.8 54.1 71
Saanich 3 5.03 3.83 1.89 8.06 6.13 3.02 3.4 3.0 2.5 42.6 63
Tulameen 3 2.94 2.62 1.87 4.72 4.20 3.00 4.1 3.9 3.2 67.3 25
WSU 1447 3 2.60 2.46 2.16 4.16 3.93 3.46 3.4 3.8 3.4 85.4 81
WSU 1499 2 2.56 2.65 1.73 4.10 4.24 2.78 2.3 2.4 2.2 66.6 12
LSD y 1.25 1.06 0.93 2.00 1.69 1.50 0.8 0.8 0.6 67
Plants were grown in hills with spacing of 3ft between the plants and row spacing of 10ft (3588 plants/ha). Plants were pruned to 6 canes per
hill and looped at the top of the trellis. Italicised entries noted for fruit holding up particularly well to machine-harvesting.
z Not all plots harvested in every year.
y Data from replicated plots subjected to ANOVA with least significant difference (LSD) of 5%
024