2012 - Washington Red Raspberry Commission

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Table 2. Efficacy of unlabeled insecticides on SWD on red raspberry Percent Mortality Treatment Rate/acre 1 DAT 3 DAT 8 DAT Warrior II 1.92 fl oz 81.6ab 51.3a 53.2ab Brigadier 6.14 fl oz 12.1fg 10c 0e Endigo ZC 4.5 fl oz 51cde 43.3ab 31.4bc Leverage 360 3.2 fl oz 70.4abcd 61.8a 69a Cyazypyr 20.5 fl oz 33.6efg 2.1c 0e Untreated check 5g 0c 3.6e Mean within columns followed by the same letter are not significantly different (Fisher's Protected LSD, P
Table 3. Clay color weevil topical bioassay on red raspberry, <strong>2012</strong> Percent Mortality Treatment Rate/acre 1 DAT 2 DAT 4 DAT Brigade 2 EC 6.4 fl oz 100a Mustang Max 4 fl oz 100a Actara 3 oz 63.3b 96.7a 80a Avaunt 6 oz 40bc 43.3b 90a Leverage 2.7 6.4 fl oz 100a Voliam flexi 7 oz b 83.3a 93.3a Cyazypyr 10 SE 20.5 fl oz cd 40b 50b Untreated check 0d 0c 0c Mean within columns followed by the same letter are not significantly different (Fisher's Protected LSD, P
Page 1 and 2:
2013 Research Proposals and 2012 Re
Page 3 and 4:
Table of Contents Primary Investiga
Page 5 and 6:
2012 WASHINGTON RED RASPBERRY COMMI
Page 7 and 8:
ut the effect was short lived (Pink
Page 9 and 10:
Privѐ, J., J.A. Sullivan, and J.T.
Page 11 and 12:
Corbin, A Benedict, C Cogger, C Bar
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
Budget: Indirect or overhead costs
Page 17 and 18:
Justification and Background: In 20
Page 19 and 20:
Budget: Indirect or overhead costs
Page 21 and 22:
2012 PROGRESS REPORT Title: Red Ras
Page 23 and 24:
than most other varieties but are s
Page 25 and 26:
Table 1. Yield and fruit weight of
Page 27 and 28:
Table 3. Harvest data for hand-harv
Page 29 and 30:
Table 5. Susceptibility (S) and res
Page 31 and 32:
identifying new, unbroken sources o
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
tested rigorously over a period of
Page 37 and 38:
Other funding sources: All amounts
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
We will collect large quantities of
Page 43 and 44:
Current & Pending Support NAME (Lis
Page 45 and 46:
Appendices Table RY1. Red raspberry
Page 47 and 48: Table RY3. Mean yield and berry siz
Page 49 and 50: Table RY5. Mean yield and berry siz
Page 51 and 52: 8 Table RY8. Ripening season for pr
Page 53 and 54: - Cultivars for the Pacific Northwe
Page 55 and 56: Current & Pending Support Chad Finn
Page 57 and 58: Washington Red Raspberry Commission
Page 59 and 60: Title of project: Support of SCRI P
Page 61 and 62: We will develop markers that will b
Page 63 and 64: the operations amenable to and desi
Page 65 and 66: Budget: Indirect or overhead costs
Page 67 and 68: Current & Pending Support-Tarara In
Page 69 and 70: Table 1. Primocane injury and weed
Page 71 and 72: Importantly, floricane injury and b
Page 73 and 74: 2013 WASHINGTON RED RASPBERRY COMMI
Page 75 and 76: density. The roots and shoots are s
Page 77 and 78: Name (List PI #1 first) Moore, P.P.
Page 79 and 80: Publications/Presentations: July 18
Page 81 and 82: Table 2. 2011 and 2012 harvest of 2
Page 83 and 84: PROJECT: 13C-3755-5641 TITLE: Red R
Page 85 and 86: PROPOSED BUDGET: Funds from the Nor
Page 87 and 88: Washington Red Raspberry Commission
Page 91 and 92: • Maximum number of plants per se
Page 93 and 94: Project Title: Fungicide Resistance
Page 95 and 96: society’s/the environment’s bes
Page 97: aged, contact/ingestion residues fo
Page 101 and 102: Project No.: New Title: Management
Page 103 and 104: growers in the Lynden area that hav
Page 105 and 106: Application Date: November 13, 2012
Page 107 and 108: particular inoculum levels are asso
Page 109 and 110: References: Berkeley, G. H. and Jac
Page 113 and 114: technical bulletin states “For pe
Page 115: Budget: 2013 2014 Salaries $0 $0 Ad
show all

2012 - Washington Red Raspberry Commission

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?