09.02.2015 Views

'Twixt two worlds : a narrative of the life and work of William Eglinton

'Twixt two worlds : a narrative of the life and work of William Eglinton

'Twixt two worlds : a narrative of the life and work of William Eglinton

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

—<br />

'<br />

Tzvixt Two Worlds.<br />

were heard, <strong>the</strong> inkst<strong>and</strong> <strong>and</strong> pen were removed, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> card taken out <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> book, when<br />

we found written upon it <strong>the</strong> words :<br />

" Happy souls ! to end botJi <strong>the</strong>ir loves <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir lives on <strong>the</strong> same day. More happy still if<br />

<strong>the</strong>y went toge<strong>the</strong>r to <strong>the</strong> same place.— (Line 13, p. 245.)<br />

Turning to page 245, where I suppose <strong>the</strong> card had happened to be placed, <strong>and</strong> counting<br />

down to line 13, I found <strong>the</strong> passage, which had been accurately copied in fresh ink on <strong>the</strong><br />

card—<strong>the</strong> closing words <strong>of</strong> one <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> curious mediaeval stories whose beautiful style is said to<br />

have perfected <strong>the</strong> most melodious <strong>of</strong> European languages. I narrowly examined <strong>the</strong> <strong>two</strong> leaves<br />

to see if <strong>the</strong>re was any stain <strong>of</strong> ink, <strong>and</strong> did not find a trace. Carefully watching in a good light<br />

no movement was seen <strong>of</strong> book, pen, or inkst<strong>and</strong>.<br />

Who can explain it No doubt it seems wildly "impossible"—but it is, never<strong>the</strong>less,<br />

absolutely true. The writing lies before me —<strong>and</strong> Fig. 6 is a good photographic facsimile. I have<br />

several examples <strong>of</strong> writing in closed <strong>and</strong> weighted books with bits <strong>of</strong> lead pencil—but with<br />

ink ! It is an astonishing manifestation <strong>of</strong> an almost inconceivable power. All I can do is to<br />

describe accurately <strong>the</strong> conditions. I cannot explain <strong>the</strong> way in which spirits deal with matter,<br />

which is evidently quite a different thing to <strong>the</strong>m, from what it is to us, so that <strong>the</strong>ir operations<br />

are, as Bow Street magistrates <strong>and</strong> philosophers alike aver, quite " contrary to <strong>the</strong> well-known<br />

laws <strong>of</strong> Nature."<br />

The most sceptical can see, hold in <strong>the</strong>ir h<strong>and</strong>s, <strong>and</strong> carefully examine <strong>the</strong> <strong>work</strong> <strong>of</strong><br />

materialised spirits. This <strong>work</strong> is real, visible, tangible, <strong>and</strong> not produced by <strong>the</strong>ir imagination<br />

or by mine. The only question is as to <strong>the</strong> credibility <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> testimony <strong>and</strong> as to <strong>the</strong> manner in<br />

which it is produced. For both <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>m <strong>the</strong>re is my statement, which can be confirmed at need<br />

by <strong>the</strong> testimony <strong>of</strong> four or five credible persons. The conditions forbid any idea <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

possibility <strong>of</strong> fraud.<br />

I must explain, in regard to <strong>the</strong> examples <strong>of</strong> direct writing, <strong>and</strong> that <strong>of</strong> drawing <strong>and</strong><br />

writing (Figs. 7 <strong>and</strong> 8) that <strong>the</strong>y have been a little marred in <strong>the</strong> process <strong>of</strong> reproduction.<br />

In Fig. 7, <strong>the</strong> heading <strong>of</strong> my note paper, <strong>and</strong> my initials <strong>and</strong> date, written in ink, are clearly<br />

given ;<br />

but all <strong>the</strong> rest, <strong>the</strong> four different h<strong>and</strong>writings, not written by <strong>the</strong> h<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> persons<br />

living in our world—written by <strong>the</strong> h<strong>and</strong>s <strong>of</strong> materialised spirits, were in pencil, <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong> too<br />

light a colour, I feared, to transfer by any process by which <strong>the</strong>y could be printed with type.<br />

I <strong>the</strong>refore took a fine black pencil <strong>and</strong> carefully deepened <strong>the</strong> colour <strong>of</strong> every line. This<br />

process has given a little roughness to <strong>the</strong> writing. It is not as smooth <strong>and</strong> clear as <strong>the</strong><br />

original ; but it has not marred <strong>the</strong> distinctive individuality <strong>of</strong> each h<strong>and</strong>, <strong>and</strong> has made <strong>the</strong>m<br />

more legible.<br />

The same defects have still more marred <strong>the</strong> combined drawing <strong>and</strong> writing <strong>of</strong> Fig. 8,<br />

which was remarkable for <strong>the</strong> perfection <strong>and</strong> delicacy <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> seven circles. The words<br />

between <strong>the</strong> circles <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Lord's Prayer in <strong>the</strong> centre circle were too finely written for me<br />

to venture to touch, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>y are but imperfectly given, but can, I find, be read with a<br />

magnifying glass <strong>of</strong> moderate power. Now for <strong>the</strong> conditions under which <strong>the</strong>se <strong>two</strong> examples<br />

were produced. In <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> Fig. 7, six persons were sitting round a table in a small,<br />

locked <strong>and</strong> darkened room in my house, 32, Fopstone Road, Earl's Court, London, S.W.,<br />

February 2nd, 1878. These persons were Mr. W. <strong>Eglinton</strong>, Mr. A., Mrs. Wilkes, Miss<br />

Merriman (a young American lady), Mrs. Nichols, <strong>and</strong> myself. I turned <strong>of</strong>f <strong>the</strong> gas light,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!