Cockroache; Ecology, behavior & history - W.J. Bell
Cockroache; Ecology, behavior & history - W.J. Bell
Cockroache; Ecology, behavior & history - W.J. Bell
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Bolker, 2003). The highly complex and tightly coordinated<br />
interactions of Blattabacterium endosymbionts<br />
with their hosts during transovarial transmission and<br />
embryogenesis (Sacchi et al., 1988, 1996, 1998b) suggest<br />
that these symbionts may influence the earliest stages of<br />
cockroach development.<br />
MICROBES AS PATHOGENS<br />
Microbes can be formidable foes. Most animals battle infection<br />
throughout their lives, and devote substantial resources<br />
to responding defensively to microbial invaders<br />
(e.g., Irving et al., 2001). <strong>Cockroache</strong>s, like other animals<br />
that utilize rotting organic matter (Janzen, 1977), must<br />
fend off pathogenesis and avoid or detoxify the chemical<br />
offenses of microbes. Most Blattaria lead particularly<br />
vulnerable lifestyles. They are relatively long-lived insects<br />
that favor humid, microbe-saturated environments;<br />
many live in close association with conspecifics, particularly<br />
during the early, vulnerable part of life. They also<br />
have a predilection for feeding on rotting material, conspecifics,<br />
feces, and dead bodies. Pathogens and parasites<br />
such as protozoa and helminths (e.g., Fig. 5.10) are no<br />
doubt a strong and unrelenting selective pressure, but<br />
cockroach defensive strategies must be delicately balanced<br />
so that their vast array of mutualists are not placed<br />
in the line of fire. An example of these conflicting pressures<br />
lies in cockroach social <strong>behavior</strong>. On the one hand,<br />
beneficial microbes promote social <strong>behavior</strong>. Transmission<br />
of hindgut microbes requires <strong>behavior</strong>al adaptations<br />
so that each generation acquires microflora from the previous<br />
one, and consequently selects for association of<br />
neonates with older conspecifics. On the other hand,<br />
pathogenic microbes exploit cockroach social <strong>behavior</strong>,<br />
in that their transmission occurs via inter-individual<br />
Fig. 5.10 Hairworm parasite (Paleochordodes protus) of an<br />
adult blattellid cockroach (in or near the genus Supella) in<br />
Dominican amber (15–45 mya). From Poinar (1999); photo<br />
courtesy of George Poinar Jr.<br />
transfer. Oocysts of parasitic Gregarina, for example, are<br />
transmitted via feces (Lopes and Alves, 2005), and the biological<br />
control of urban pest cockroaches with pathogens<br />
is predicated largely on their spread via inter-individual<br />
contact in aggregations (e.g., Mohan et al. 1999;<br />
Kaakeh et al.,1996). Roth and Willis (1957) document inter-individual<br />
transfer of a variety of gregarines, coccids,<br />
amoebae, and nematodes via cannibalism, coprophagy,<br />
or proximity.<br />
<strong>Cockroache</strong>s have a variety of <strong>behavior</strong>al and physiological<br />
mechanisms for preventing and managing disease.<br />
At least two cockroach species recognize foci of potential<br />
infection and take <strong>behavior</strong>al measures to evade them.<br />
Healthy nymphs of B. germanica are known to avoid dead<br />
nymphs infected with the fungus Metarhizium anisopliae<br />
(Kaakeh et al., 1996). The wood-feeding cockroach Cryptocercus<br />
sequesters corpses and controls fungal growth in<br />
nurseries (Chapter 9). The former <strong>behavior</strong> may function<br />
to shield remaining members of the family from infection.<br />
Vigilant hygienic <strong>behavior</strong> or fungistatic properties<br />
of their excreta or secretions may also play a role throughout<br />
the gallery system. Fungal overgrowth of tunnels is<br />
never observed unless the galleries are abandoned (CAN,<br />
pers. obs.).<br />
The glandular system of cockroaches is complex and<br />
sophisticated, with seven types of exocrine glands found<br />
in the head alone (Brossut, 1973). The mandibular glands<br />
of two species (Blaberus craniifer and Eublaberus distanti)<br />
secrete an aggregation pheromone; otherwise the function<br />
of cephalic glands is unknown (Brossut, 1970, 1979).<br />
The secretion of some of these may have antimicrobial<br />
properties, and could be spread over the surface of the<br />
body to form an antibiotic “shell” during autogrooming,<br />
particularly if the cockroach periodically runs a leg over<br />
its head or through its mouthparts during the grooming<br />
<strong>behavior</strong>al sequence. Autogrooming therefore may function<br />
not only to remove potential cuticular pathogens<br />
physically, but also to disseminate chemicals that curtail<br />
their growth or spore germination. Dermal glands are<br />
typically spread over the entire abdominal integument of<br />
both males and females (200–400/mm 2 ) (Sreng, 1984),<br />
and five types of defensive-type exocrine glands have<br />
been described (Roth and Alsop, 1978) (Fig. 5.11). Most<br />
of the latter produce chemical defenses effective against<br />
an array of vertebrate and invertebrate predators (Fig.<br />
1.11A), but the influence of these chemicals on non-visible<br />
organisms is unexplored. They may well function as<br />
“immediate effronteries” to predators as well as “long<br />
term antagonists” to bacteria and fungi (Roth and Eisner,<br />
1961; Duffy, 1976), and act subtly, by altering growth<br />
rates, spore germination, virulence, or chemotaxis (Duffy,<br />
1976). Most cockroach exocrine glands produce multicomponent<br />
secretions (Roth and Alsop, 1978). The man-<br />
MICROBES: THE UNSEEN INFLUENCE 87