21.03.2015 Views

Cockroache; Ecology, behavior & history - W.J. Bell

Cockroache; Ecology, behavior & history - W.J. Bell

Cockroache; Ecology, behavior & history - W.J. Bell

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

NINE<br />

Termites as Social <strong>Cockroache</strong>s<br />

Our ancestors were descended in early Cretaceous times from certain kind-hearted<br />

old cockroaches.<br />

—W.M. Wheeler, “The Termitodoxa, of Biology<br />

and Society” (in the voice of a termite king)<br />

It has long been known that termites (Isoptera), cockroaches (Blattaria), and mantids<br />

(Mantodea) are closely related (Wheeler, 1904; Walker, 1922; Marks and Lawson, 1962);<br />

they are commonly grouped as suborders of the order Dictyoptera (Kristensen, 1991).<br />

Although there is a general agreement on the monophyly of the order, during the past<br />

two decades the sister group relationships of these three taxa and the position of woodfeeding<br />

cockroaches in the family Cryptocercidae in relation to termites have been lively<br />

points of debate (see Nalepa and Bandi, 2000; Deitz et al., 2003; Lo, 2003 for further discussion).<br />

A variety of factors contribute to obscuring the relationships. First, fossil and<br />

molecular evidence indicate that these taxa radiated within a short span of time (Lo et<br />

al. 2000; Nalepa and Bandi, 2000). A rapid proliferation and divergence of the early forms<br />

would obscure branching events via short internal branches separating clades, instability<br />

of branching order, and low bootstrap values of the corresponding nodes (Philippe<br />

and Adoutte, 1996; Moore and Willmer, 1997). Second, heterochrony played a major role<br />

in the genesis and subsequent evolution of the termite lineage (Nalepa and Bandi, 2000).<br />

It is notoriously difficult to determine the phylogenetic relationships of organisms with<br />

a large number of paedomorphic characters (Kluge, 1985; Rieppel, 1990, 1993). Reductions<br />

and losses make for few morphological characters on which to base cladistic analysis,<br />

and parallel losses of characters by developmental truncation make it difficult to distinguish<br />

between paedomorphic and plesiomorphic traits (discussed in Chapter 2).<br />

Third, cockroaches in the particularly contentious family Cryptocercidae live and die<br />

within logs and have left no fossil record. Fourth, extant lineages of Dictyoptera represent<br />

the terminal branches of a once luxuriant tree, with many extinct taxa. Finally, several<br />

phylogenetic studies of the Dictyoptera have been problematic because of ambiguous<br />

character polarity, inadequate taxon sampling, and questionable reliability of the<br />

characters used for phylogenetic inference (for discussion, see Lo et al. 2000; Deitz et al.,<br />

2003; Klass and Meier, 2006).<br />

The bulk of current evidence supports the classic view (Cleveland et al., 1934; Grassé<br />

150

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!