21.03.2015 Views

Cockroache; Ecology, behavior & history - W.J. Bell

Cockroache; Ecology, behavior & history - W.J. Bell

Cockroache; Ecology, behavior & history - W.J. Bell

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

hatching by nymphs increases when other protein sources<br />

are lacking (WJB, unpubl. obs.).<br />

Live bearing permits females to dispense with producing<br />

a thick, protective oothecal case, and allows them to<br />

channel the protein that would have been required for its<br />

manufacture into present or future offspring or into their<br />

own maintenance. Nonetheless, the burden of “wearing”<br />

the next generation may be metabolically expensive and<br />

impair mobility, with consequences for predator evasion<br />

and foraging efficiency. In B. germanica, however, Lee<br />

(1994) found no correlation between the physical load on<br />

the female and oxygen consumption, and in N. cinerea the<br />

mass-specific metabolic heat flux of pregnant females at<br />

rest was actually reduced in relation to non-pregnant females.<br />

This suggests that the energetic demands of gestation<br />

in these species do not translate into increased metabolic<br />

rates (Schultze-Motel and Greven, 1998). Still, most<br />

female cockroaches feed little, if at all, during gestation,<br />

even when offered food ad libitum in the laboratory (e.g.,<br />

Blattella—Cochran, 1983b; Hamilton and Schal, 1988;<br />

Rhyparobia—Engelmann and Rau, 1965; Trichoblatta—<br />

Reuben, 1988). The most commonly offered explanation<br />

for fasting at this time is that the cumbersome bodies of<br />

pregnant females may increase their vulnerability to predation.<br />

This seems reasonable, given that, first, the mass<br />

of the reproductive product is 30% or more of female<br />

body weight in both B. germanica (Mullins et al., 1992;<br />

Lee, 1994) and N. cinerea (Schultze-Motel and Greven,<br />

1998), and second, pregnant N. cinerea are demonstrably<br />

slower than virgin females of the same age (Meller and<br />

Greven, 1996a). Agility also may be affected. Ross (1929),<br />

however, opined that pregnant B. germanica“do not show<br />

any signs of being impeded by their burden” despite the<br />

clumsy ootheca dragging from their nether regions. Loss<br />

of agility may not be an issue in cockroaches that rely on<br />

crypsis or thanatosis to escape predators, but the larger<br />

body of gravid females requires a larger crevice in species<br />

that seek protective shelter (Koehler et al., 1994; Wille,<br />

1920). It is unknown whether the physical burden of an<br />

egg clutch hinders flying in those species that depend on<br />

it for evasion. Blattella karnyi females can take to the air<br />

while carrying an impressive ootheca of up to 40 eggs<br />

(Roth, 1985).<br />

In viviparous D. punctata, gravid females normally<br />

double their body weight during gestation but nonetheless<br />

forage; the nutrient secretion of the brood sac is derived<br />

from the maternal diet rather than stored nutrients,<br />

particularly in early pregnancy (Stay and Coop, 1974;<br />

WJB, unpubl. data). This species has hard, dome-shaped<br />

tegmina (common name “beetle cockroach”) and impressive<br />

defensive secretions (Eisner, 1958; Roth and Stay,<br />

1958) that may permit some bravery when under attack<br />

by ants (Fig. 1.11A). Vertebrate predators, however, are<br />

threats, and lizards, toads, and birds have been observed<br />

eating them in the field (Roth and Stay, 1958; WJB, pers.<br />

obs.). It is possible that D. punctata females rely on readily<br />

accessible, predictable sources of high-quality food for<br />

supporting the explosive growth of their embryos. Their<br />

diet, however, appears little different from that of many<br />

other cockroaches.<br />

Reduced Fecundity<br />

One of the most significant costs exacted by carrying egg<br />

cases lies in terms of fecundity. Oviparous type A cockroaches<br />

have relatively high reproductive rates because<br />

the interval between successive oothecae is short, usually<br />

much shorter than the period of incubation. Females typically<br />

produce a second egg case long before the first laid<br />

hatches. Oviparous species with external egg retention as<br />

well as ovoviviparous females produce relatively few<br />

oothecae because oocytes do not mature in the ovaries<br />

while an ootheca is being carried. Viviparity is particularly<br />

expensive, in that female D. punctata have fewer eggs<br />

per oothecae, produce fewer oothecae per lifetime, and<br />

have a longer period of gestation than any other blaberid<br />

(Roth and Stay, 1961; Roth, 1967d). Consequently, the<br />

number of egg cases per lifetime decreases and the oviposition<br />

interval increases in the order oviparous, ovoviviparous,<br />

viviparous (Fig. 7.9) (Willis et al., 1958; Roth and<br />

Stay, 1959, 1962a; Breed, 1983).<br />

Fecundity also appears reduced in cockroach species<br />

that exhibit parental care, particularly if the care involves<br />

feeding young dependents on bodily fluids. Such pabulum<br />

may be demanding in terms of the structures involved<br />

in its manufacture, the nutrients incorporated into<br />

the secretions, and the energy required to produce them.<br />

Fig. 7.9 Frequency of oviposition by individuals of different<br />

species of cockroach. Each dot represents the formation of an<br />

ootheca; the length of the line is the adult lifespan of the female.<br />

Symploce pallens ( hospes) and Supella longipalpa (Blattellidae)<br />

are oviparous and drop the ootheca shortly after it is<br />

formed. Blattella germanica and B. vaga (Blattellidae) carry<br />

their ootheca externally until the eggs hatch. The blaberids<br />

Pycnoscelus surinamensis (parthenogenetic) and Nauphoeta<br />

cinerea are ovoviviparous, and Diploptera punctata is viviparous.<br />

After Roth (1970a).<br />

128 COCKROACHES

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!