21.03.2015 Views

Cockroache; Ecology, behavior & history - W.J. Bell

Cockroache; Ecology, behavior & history - W.J. Bell

Cockroache; Ecology, behavior & history - W.J. Bell

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

are usually lost in older female instars and are absent in<br />

adult females. Juveniles have undeveloped and poorly<br />

sclerotized genitalia and they often lack other characters<br />

useful in species identification. Nymphs of Australian<br />

soil-burrowing cockroaches, for example, are difficult to<br />

tell apart because the pronotal and tergal features that<br />

distinguish the various species are not fully developed<br />

(Walker et al., 1994). In some taxa, nymphal coloration<br />

and markings differ markedly from those of adults, making<br />

them scarcely recognizable as the same species (e.g.,<br />

Australian Polyzosteria spp.—Tepper, 1893; Mackerras,<br />

1965a). In general, the first few instars of a given species<br />

can be distinguished from each other on the basis of nonoverlapping<br />

measurements of sclerotized morphological<br />

features such as head width or leg segments. In older<br />

stages, however, accumulated variation results in overlap<br />

of these measurements, making it difficult to determine<br />

the stage of a given nymph. This variation results from intermolt<br />

periods that differ greatly from individual to individual,<br />

not only in different stages, but also within a<br />

stage (Scharrer, 1946; Bodenstein, 1953; Takagi, 1978;<br />

Zervos, 1987). The difficulty in distinguishing different<br />

developmental stages within a species and the nymphs of<br />

different species from each other often makes young developmental<br />

stages intractable to study in the field. Consequently,<br />

the natural <strong>history</strong> of cockroach juveniles is<br />

virtually unknown.<br />

Dimorphism<br />

In addition to dimorphism in the presence of wings<br />

(Chapter 2) and overall body size (discussed below), male<br />

and female cockroaches may differ in the color and shape<br />

of the body or in the size, color, and shape of specific body<br />

parts. The general shape of the male, particularly the abdomen,<br />

is often more attenuated than that of the female.<br />

Several sex-specific morphological differences suggest<br />

that the demands of finding and winning a mate are<br />

highly influential in cockroach morphological evolution.<br />

Dimorphism is most pronounced in species where males<br />

are active, aerial insects, but the females have reduced<br />

wings or are apterous. These males may have large,<br />

bulging, nearly contiguous eyes while those of the more<br />

sedentary female are flattened and farther apart, for example,<br />

several species of Laxta and Neolaxta (Mackerras,<br />

1968b; Roth, 1987a, 1992) and Colapteroblatta compsa<br />

(Roth, 1998a). Male morphology in the blattellid genera<br />

Escala and Robshelfordia is completely different from that<br />

of the opposite sex (Roth, 1991b). Such strong sexual dimorphism<br />

makes associating the sexes difficult, particularly<br />

when related species are sympatric (Roth, 1992); as<br />

a result, conspecific males and females are sometimes<br />

described as separate species. Additional sexual dimorphisms<br />

include the presence of tergal glands on males of<br />

many species, and the size and shape of the pronotum.<br />

Asymmetry<br />

<strong>Cockroache</strong>s tend to have an unusually high level of fluctuating<br />

asymmetry (Hanitsch, 1923), defined as small,<br />

random differences in bilateral characters. The cockroach<br />

tarsus is normally composed of five segments, but on one<br />

leg it may have just four. Spines on the femora also may<br />

vary in number between the right and left sides of the<br />

same individual. In both characters a reduction more often<br />

occurs on the left side of the body. Wing veins may be<br />

simple on one side and bifurcated on the other. This tendency<br />

often makes it difficult to interpret the fossil record,<br />

where so much of our information is based on wings.<br />

Asymmetries of this type are widely used as a measure of<br />

fitness because they result from developmental instability,<br />

the ability of an organism to withstand developmental<br />

perturbation. Of late, fluctuating asymmetry has become<br />

a major but controversial topic in evolutionary<br />

biology (e.g., Markow, 1995; Nosil, 2001), but is unstudied<br />

in the Blattaria. Less subtle bilateral asymmetries also<br />

occur in cockroaches; gynandromorphs are reported in<br />

Periplaneta americana, Byrsotria fumigata (Willis and<br />

Roth, 1959), Blattella germanica (Ross and Cochran,<br />

1967), and Gromphadorhina portentosa (Graves et al.,<br />

1986).<br />

Pronotum<br />

The large, shield-shaped pronotum is a defining characteristic<br />

of cockroaches and its size, shape, curvature, and<br />

protuberances have systematic value in certain groups<br />

(e.g., Perisphaeriinae, Panesthiinae). Some cockroaches<br />

are more strongly hooded than others, that is, the head<br />

ranges from completely covered by the pronotum to almost<br />

entirely exposed. In some species the pronotum is<br />

flat, in others it has varying degrees of declivity. At its extreme<br />

it may form a cowl, shaped like an upside down U<br />

in section. The border of the pronotum may be recurved<br />

to varying degrees, forming a gutter around the sides,<br />

which sometimes continues into the cephalic margin.<br />

The majority of species of Colapteroblatta, for example,<br />

have the lateral wings of the pronotum deflexed and the<br />

edges may be ridged or swollen (Hebard, 1920 [1919];<br />

Roth, 1998a, Fig. 1-6). In a few cases the pronotum can<br />

resemble the headpiece of certain orders of nuns (Fig.<br />

1.1A). Some species of Cyrtotria have pronota perforated<br />

with large, semilunar pores in both sexes; these may be<br />

the openings of glands (Fig. 1.1B) (Shelford, 1908). The<br />

shape of the pronotum can vary within a species, with<br />

distinct forms correlated with varying degrees of wing re-<br />

2 COCKROACHES

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!