Cockroache; Ecology, behavior & history - W.J. Bell
Cockroache; Ecology, behavior & history - W.J. Bell
Cockroache; Ecology, behavior & history - W.J. Bell
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
are usually lost in older female instars and are absent in<br />
adult females. Juveniles have undeveloped and poorly<br />
sclerotized genitalia and they often lack other characters<br />
useful in species identification. Nymphs of Australian<br />
soil-burrowing cockroaches, for example, are difficult to<br />
tell apart because the pronotal and tergal features that<br />
distinguish the various species are not fully developed<br />
(Walker et al., 1994). In some taxa, nymphal coloration<br />
and markings differ markedly from those of adults, making<br />
them scarcely recognizable as the same species (e.g.,<br />
Australian Polyzosteria spp.—Tepper, 1893; Mackerras,<br />
1965a). In general, the first few instars of a given species<br />
can be distinguished from each other on the basis of nonoverlapping<br />
measurements of sclerotized morphological<br />
features such as head width or leg segments. In older<br />
stages, however, accumulated variation results in overlap<br />
of these measurements, making it difficult to determine<br />
the stage of a given nymph. This variation results from intermolt<br />
periods that differ greatly from individual to individual,<br />
not only in different stages, but also within a<br />
stage (Scharrer, 1946; Bodenstein, 1953; Takagi, 1978;<br />
Zervos, 1987). The difficulty in distinguishing different<br />
developmental stages within a species and the nymphs of<br />
different species from each other often makes young developmental<br />
stages intractable to study in the field. Consequently,<br />
the natural <strong>history</strong> of cockroach juveniles is<br />
virtually unknown.<br />
Dimorphism<br />
In addition to dimorphism in the presence of wings<br />
(Chapter 2) and overall body size (discussed below), male<br />
and female cockroaches may differ in the color and shape<br />
of the body or in the size, color, and shape of specific body<br />
parts. The general shape of the male, particularly the abdomen,<br />
is often more attenuated than that of the female.<br />
Several sex-specific morphological differences suggest<br />
that the demands of finding and winning a mate are<br />
highly influential in cockroach morphological evolution.<br />
Dimorphism is most pronounced in species where males<br />
are active, aerial insects, but the females have reduced<br />
wings or are apterous. These males may have large,<br />
bulging, nearly contiguous eyes while those of the more<br />
sedentary female are flattened and farther apart, for example,<br />
several species of Laxta and Neolaxta (Mackerras,<br />
1968b; Roth, 1987a, 1992) and Colapteroblatta compsa<br />
(Roth, 1998a). Male morphology in the blattellid genera<br />
Escala and Robshelfordia is completely different from that<br />
of the opposite sex (Roth, 1991b). Such strong sexual dimorphism<br />
makes associating the sexes difficult, particularly<br />
when related species are sympatric (Roth, 1992); as<br />
a result, conspecific males and females are sometimes<br />
described as separate species. Additional sexual dimorphisms<br />
include the presence of tergal glands on males of<br />
many species, and the size and shape of the pronotum.<br />
Asymmetry<br />
<strong>Cockroache</strong>s tend to have an unusually high level of fluctuating<br />
asymmetry (Hanitsch, 1923), defined as small,<br />
random differences in bilateral characters. The cockroach<br />
tarsus is normally composed of five segments, but on one<br />
leg it may have just four. Spines on the femora also may<br />
vary in number between the right and left sides of the<br />
same individual. In both characters a reduction more often<br />
occurs on the left side of the body. Wing veins may be<br />
simple on one side and bifurcated on the other. This tendency<br />
often makes it difficult to interpret the fossil record,<br />
where so much of our information is based on wings.<br />
Asymmetries of this type are widely used as a measure of<br />
fitness because they result from developmental instability,<br />
the ability of an organism to withstand developmental<br />
perturbation. Of late, fluctuating asymmetry has become<br />
a major but controversial topic in evolutionary<br />
biology (e.g., Markow, 1995; Nosil, 2001), but is unstudied<br />
in the Blattaria. Less subtle bilateral asymmetries also<br />
occur in cockroaches; gynandromorphs are reported in<br />
Periplaneta americana, Byrsotria fumigata (Willis and<br />
Roth, 1959), Blattella germanica (Ross and Cochran,<br />
1967), and Gromphadorhina portentosa (Graves et al.,<br />
1986).<br />
Pronotum<br />
The large, shield-shaped pronotum is a defining characteristic<br />
of cockroaches and its size, shape, curvature, and<br />
protuberances have systematic value in certain groups<br />
(e.g., Perisphaeriinae, Panesthiinae). Some cockroaches<br />
are more strongly hooded than others, that is, the head<br />
ranges from completely covered by the pronotum to almost<br />
entirely exposed. In some species the pronotum is<br />
flat, in others it has varying degrees of declivity. At its extreme<br />
it may form a cowl, shaped like an upside down U<br />
in section. The border of the pronotum may be recurved<br />
to varying degrees, forming a gutter around the sides,<br />
which sometimes continues into the cephalic margin.<br />
The majority of species of Colapteroblatta, for example,<br />
have the lateral wings of the pronotum deflexed and the<br />
edges may be ridged or swollen (Hebard, 1920 [1919];<br />
Roth, 1998a, Fig. 1-6). In a few cases the pronotum can<br />
resemble the headpiece of certain orders of nuns (Fig.<br />
1.1A). Some species of Cyrtotria have pronota perforated<br />
with large, semilunar pores in both sexes; these may be<br />
the openings of glands (Fig. 1.1B) (Shelford, 1908). The<br />
shape of the pronotum can vary within a species, with<br />
distinct forms correlated with varying degrees of wing re-<br />
2 COCKROACHES