Cockroache; Ecology, behavior & history - W.J. Bell
Cockroache; Ecology, behavior & history - W.J. Bell
Cockroache; Ecology, behavior & history - W.J. Bell
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
male of Eub. posticus “raises up on his forelegs and makes<br />
rhythmic pushing movements of his abdomen in a pulsating<br />
fashion” (Wendelken and Barth, 1987). Diploptera<br />
punctata males move their abdomen from side to side just<br />
prior to releasing the female (Roth and Stay, 1961). Conversely,<br />
females of Parc. fulvescens assume an arched posture<br />
during copulation, and rhythmical movements were<br />
observed for which the female appeared responsible<br />
(Wendelken and Barth, 1971). In addition to internally<br />
stimulating the female with genital structures, males may<br />
sing, tap, rub, hit, kick, wave, lick, wet with secretions,<br />
bite, feed, rock, and shake females in attempting to influence<br />
cryptic choice decisions (Eberhard, 1996). The production<br />
of oral liquid during mating by male Parc. fulvescens<br />
was listed by Eberhard (1991) as a form of<br />
copulatory courtship. A repeating sequence of pronotal<br />
butting, abdominal wagging, and circling <strong>behavior</strong> has<br />
been observed in C. punctulatus after genital disengagement<br />
(Nalepa, 1988a) and has been interpreted by Eberhard<br />
(1991) as post-copulatory courtship.<br />
Reduction and Loss of Genitalic Structures<br />
The genital phallomeres of some blaberid cockroaches<br />
are lightly sclerotized, considerably reduced, or in some<br />
cases, altogether absent. The Panchlorinae are characterized<br />
by the absence of a genital hook, and if the remaining<br />
two phallomeres are present, they are markedly reduced<br />
(Roth, 1971b). Likewise, one or more phallomeres<br />
may be reduced or absent in many Panesthiinae (including<br />
Geoscapheini) (Fig. 6.11D) (Roth, 1977). Macropanesthia<br />
rhinoceros and M. heppleorum males completely<br />
lack a genital hook, and sclerites L1 and L2d<br />
are also missing. Some of the Australian soil-burrowing<br />
cockroaches exhibit intraspecific variation in the reduction<br />
of phallomeres (Walker and Rose, 1998). The occurrence<br />
of poorly developed male genitalia in cockroaches<br />
corresponds very well with copulatory <strong>behavior</strong>. A reduced<br />
or absent genital hook is strong evidence of type III<br />
mating <strong>behavior</strong>, that is, the male backs into the female to<br />
initiate mating (Roth, 1971b, 1977).<br />
Simple genital structure in males is predicted by the<br />
cryptic choice hypothesis if females are monandrous, because<br />
sexual selection by female choice is possible only if<br />
females make genitalic contact with more than one male<br />
(Eberhard, 1985, 1996). In monandrous females, the<br />
choice of sire is settled prior to copulation, via mechanisms<br />
such as premating courtship or male-male contests.<br />
The mating strategy in cockroaches with reduced<br />
genitalia is not known well enough to determine if that is<br />
the case here; however, one male is usually present in social<br />
groups of Panesthia. Panesthia cribrata typically lives<br />
in aggregations, often (29%) comprised of a single adult<br />
male, a number of adult females, and nymphs of various<br />
sizes (Rugg and Rose, 1984a).<br />
Additional correlates of reduced male genitalia in<br />
cockroaches also must be considered. Among the Panesthiinae<br />
species studied, the absence of an oothecal covering<br />
around the eggs is correlated with the absence or reduction<br />
of male genital structures (Walker and Rose,<br />
1998). All of the species for which we have information<br />
also exhibit a burrowing lifestyle, tunneling in soil, rotted<br />
wood, or rotted palms. How all these threads connect<br />
(burrowing lifestyle, mating system, copulatory <strong>behavior</strong>,<br />
male genital morphology, and absence of egg case) awaits<br />
further study. It is of interest (Chapter 9), however, that<br />
termites are monogamous (Nalepa and Jones, 1991) and<br />
that isopteran males are largely unencumbered by genitalia<br />
(Roonwal, 1970). Termites also live in burrows, mate<br />
by backing into each other, and except for Mastotermes,<br />
have lost the casing around their eggs. Species in the<br />
Cryptocercidae, the sister group of termites, live in burrows<br />
and are apparently monandrous, but male genitalia<br />
are not markedly reduced; they do, however, exhibit a<br />
number of paedomorphic characters (Klass, 1997).<br />
THE FEMALE PERSPECTIVE<br />
A variety of female traits can bias paternity, including the<br />
premature interruption of copulation and the acceptance<br />
or rejection of matings from additional males. Females<br />
may also accept a male for copulation but reject him as a<br />
father. This is possible because insemination and fertilization<br />
are uncoupled in space and time (Eberhard,<br />
1985), and because females have many opportunities to<br />
modify the probability that a given copulation will result<br />
in egg fertilization. There are at least 20 different mechanisms<br />
that can result in cryptic female choice (Eberhard,<br />
1994, 1996), many of which may apply to cockroaches.<br />
These include sperm transport to storage sites, sperm<br />
nourishment during storage, the ability to discharge or<br />
digest stored sperm, and the biased use of stored sperm to<br />
effect fertilization, particularly in females with multiple<br />
spermathecae. Sperm selection may even occur at the site<br />
of fertilization; Eberhard (1996) gives as an example Periplaneta,<br />
which has up to 100 micropyles for sperm entry<br />
at one end of the egg (Davey, 1965). After fertilization<br />
ovoviviparous females may abort the egg case. The multiplicity<br />
of female mechanisms reduces the likelihood<br />
that males will be able to evolve overall control of female<br />
reproductive processes, even if males try to prevent further<br />
matings via genital plugs, mate guarding, or induced<br />
unreceptivity (Eberhard, 1996). While there are no available<br />
studies that directly address cryptic choice in female<br />
MATING STRATEGIES 105