21.03.2015 Views

Cockroache; Ecology, behavior & history - W.J. Bell

Cockroache; Ecology, behavior & history - W.J. Bell

Cockroache; Ecology, behavior & history - W.J. Bell

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Fig. 6.10 Comparison of total radiolabel content of Blattella<br />

germanica females and the oothecae they produced while feeding<br />

on either a dog food (25% crude protein) or a 5% protein<br />

diet; these females were mated to virgin males that had been simultaneously<br />

injected with 3 H leucine (a representative amino<br />

acid) and 14 C hypoxanthine (a purine converted to uric acid in<br />

vivo). Dog food fed-females and their oothecae contained 17%<br />

of the male contributed radiolabel. Those on the low-protein<br />

diet contained 63% of the radiolabel made available to them at<br />

mating. Values are mean SEM. a vs. b, p 0.005; c vs. d, p <br />

0.027; e vs. f, p 0.007 (Student’s t-test). From Mullins et al.<br />

(1992), courtesy of Donald Mullins and with permission from<br />

the Journal of Experimental Biology.<br />

ination system unavailable to females and juveniles. From<br />

the female perspective, it was suggested that a spermatophore<br />

slathered with an excretory product would be<br />

an unattractive meal, and prevent her from consuming it<br />

before the sperm moved into storage (Roth, 1967, 1970a).<br />

An alternative suggestion was that the uric acid may function<br />

as a mating plug that deters additional inseminations<br />

(Cornwell, 1968). In species such as Miriamrothschildia<br />

( Onychostylus) notulatus, Lophoblatta sp., Cariblatta<br />

minima, Amazonina sp., and Dendroblatta sobrina, so<br />

much uric acid is applied by males that the female genital<br />

segments gape open (Roth, 1967c).<br />

The most strongly supported hypothesis is that the uric<br />

acid transferred during mating acts as a nuptial gift. In B.<br />

germanica, radiolabeled uric acid can be traced from the<br />

male to the female, and subsequently to her oocytes; the<br />

transfer occurs more readily when the female is maintained<br />

on a low-nitrogen diet (Fig. 6.10). The urates are<br />

probably ingested by the female, along with the spermatophore,<br />

but it is possible that a small fraction may<br />

enter via her genital tract (Mullins and Keil, 1980). An<br />

analogous urate transfer and incorporation occurs in X.<br />

hamata. In this case, the female turns, post-copulation,<br />

and feeds on a urate-containing slurry produced and offered<br />

by the male (Schal and <strong>Bell</strong>, 1982). After copulation<br />

the male raises his wings, telescopes his abdomen, widens<br />

the genital chamber, exposes a white urate secretion, and<br />

directs it toward the female, who ingests it. Females feed<br />

for about 3.5 min. As in B. germanica, females on nitrogen-deficient<br />

diets transfer to their maturing oocytes<br />

more male-derived uric acid than do females on highprotein<br />

diets. The magnitude of the gift offered by males<br />

of these two species depends on a combination of male<br />

age, size, diet, and frequency of mating. The uricose<br />

glands of newly emerged male B. germanica contain little<br />

or no secretion; they become filled in one or two days<br />

(Roth and Dateo, 1964). The glands are nearly emptied at<br />

each copulation (Roth and Willis, 1952a).<br />

Male to female transfer of uric acid probably occurs in<br />

all cockroach species that possess male uricose glands. A<br />

recently mated female Blattella humbertiana was observed<br />

removing excess uric acid with her hind legs, then<br />

eating some of the material before it hardened (Graves,<br />

pers, comm. to LMR in Roth, 1967c). In three species of<br />

Latiblattella the male’s genitalia and posterior abdominal<br />

segments are covered with “chalky white secretion” after<br />

mating, and females of Lat. angustifrons have been observed<br />

applying their mouthparts to it after mating<br />

(Willis, 1970).<br />

Paternal Investment or Mating Effort?<br />

A nuptial gift can benefit a male in two ways. The gift can<br />

function as paternal investment, where transferred nutrients<br />

or defensive compounds increase the number or<br />

quality of resultant offspring, or it can function as mating<br />

effort, which increases the male’s fertilization success<br />

with respect to other males that mate with the same female<br />

(Eberhard, 1996). The hypotheses are not mutually<br />

exclusive, and there is debate on the distinction between<br />

them, centering mainly on the degree to which a donating<br />

male has genetic representation in the offspring that<br />

benefit from the gift. The latter is dependent on female<br />

sperm-use patterns, the length of her non-receptive period<br />

following mating, and the time delay until the female<br />

lays the eggs that profit from the male’s nutritional contribution<br />

(reviewed by Vahed, 1998).<br />

The incorporation of male-derived urates into oothecae<br />

of B. germanica suggests paternal investment, supported<br />

by three lines of evidence (Mullins et al., 1992).<br />

First, urate levels in eggs steadily decrease during development.<br />

This strongly suggests that the uric acid is metabolized<br />

during embryogenesis (Mullins and Keil, 1980),<br />

presumably via bacteroids transmitted transovarially by<br />

the female (e.g., Sacchi et al., 1998b, 2000). Second, 14 C<br />

radioactivity not attributable to 14 C urate is present in tissue<br />

extracts of oothecae (Mullins and Keil, 1980; Cochran<br />

and Mullins, 1982; Mullins et al., 1992). As pointed out by<br />

Mullins and Keil (1980), however, the 14 C radiolabel<br />

reflects pathways involving carbon atoms and not neces-<br />

100 COCKROACHES

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!