Interim Report - TEEB

More documents

Recommendations

Info

A C K N O W L E D G E M E N T S Phase I of this project has been supported by the German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, and Nuclear Safety (BMU) and the European Commission (DG Environment), together with the European Environment Agency (EEA), on the initiative of Mr Jochen Flasbart, BMU Director General of Nature Conservation, and Mr Ladislav Miko, EC Director of Protecting the Natural Environment. Members of the core working group and key contributors to this interim report include: Mark Schauer (BMU) Katarina Lipovska, Aude Neuville, Alexandra Vakrou, Stephen White (European Commission, DG Environment). Jock Martin (EEA) Heidi Wittmer and Christoph Schröter-Schlaack (Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ) Patrick ten Brink (Institute for European Environmental Policy – IEEP) Pushpam Kumar (Department of Geography and Institute for Sustainable Water, Integrated Management & Ecosystem Research, University of Liverpool). Haripriya Gundimeda (Indian Institute of Technology, Mumbai) We would also like to thank the following experts for their substantial contributions to this report: Carlos M. Rodriguez and Rosimeiry Portela (Conservation International) Alice Ruhweza (Forest Trends) John Hanks (International Conservation Services, South Africa) Ronan Uhel, Hans Vos, Jean-Louis Weber, Charlotta Colliander, and Charlotte Islev (EEA) Augustin Berghöfer, Florian Eppink, Carsten Neßhöver, Irene Ring, and Frank Wätzold (UFZ) Dalia Amor Conde and Norman Christensen (Duke University) Roberto Constantino (Mexico) Pedro Pereira (Brazil) Aditi Halder (Confederation of Indian Industry) Sarojini Thakur (Commonwealth Secretariat) Timothy Patrick Fox (“Engage Carbon”, Chennai, India) Zoe Cokeliss (CONTEXT-London) We are grateful to the members of the Advisory Board who have provided guidance and support at this early stage of the project: Joan Martinez-Alier, Giles Atkinson, Karl-Göran Mäler, Peter May, Jacqueline McGlade, Julia Marton-Lefevre, Herman Mulder, Lord Nicholas Stern, Achim Steiner. We are indebted to the researchers who have carried out the various studies contracted during Phase I for their high quality work within very tight time constraints. These studies are available on the <strong>TEEB</strong> website (see http://ec.europa.eu/ environment/nature/biodiversity/economics/index_en.htm). THE COSTS OF POLICY INACTION: THE CASE OF NOT MEETING THE 2010 BIODIVERSITY TARGET (COPI STUDY) – under contract with the European Commission: Partners and key staff Alterra: Leon Braat (team leader), Chris Klok IEEP: Patrick ten Brink (deputy team leader), Marianne Kettunen, and Niele Peralta Bezerra Ecologic: Ingo Bräuer, Holger Gerdes FEEM: Aline Chiabai, Anil Markandya, Paulo Nunes, Helen Ding, Chiara Travisi GHK: Matt Rayment MNP: Mark van Oorschot, Jan Bakkes, Michel Jeuken, Ben ten Brink UNEP-WCMC: Matt Walpole, Katarina Bolt Witteveen & Bos: Ursula Kirchholtes Advisors German Federal Agency for Nature Conservation: Horst Korn Institute for Environmental Studies: Pieter van Beukering SCOPING THE SCIENCE STUDY – under contract with the European Commission Partners and key staff University of Cambridge: Andrew Balmford (scientific leader), Ana S.L. Rodrigues, Rhys Green, James J.J. Waters, Kelly Flower, James Beresford, Hannah Peck IEEP: Patrick ten Brink, Marianne Kettunen Alterra: Rik Leemans, Rudolf de Groot, Leon Braat UNEP-WCMC: Matt Walpole, Katie Bolt Lera Miles Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global Environment, University of East Anglia: Kerry Turner, Brendan Fisher WWF-US: Robin Naidoo, Taylor H. Ricketts University of California:Claire Kremen, Alexandra-Maria Klein Bryn Mawr College: Neal M. Williams University of British Columbia: Reg Watson The study has also benefited from the contributions of many experts who have provided information, suggestions, and 60 The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity
eview; they cannot all be mentioned here (cf the full report of the study). Review of the Costs of Conservation and Priorities for Action: Andrew Balmford, Aaron Bruner (Conservation International), Robin Naidoo (WWF-US) ECONOMIC ANALYSIS AND SYNTHESIS – under contract with the European Commission Partners and key staff FEEM: Anil Markandya, Paulo Nunes, Chiara Travisi, Aline Chiabi, Helen Ding Ecologic: Andreas R. Kramer, Ingo Bräuer, Aaron Best, Sören Haffer, Kaphengst Timo, Gerdes Holger GHK: Matt Rayment IEEP: Patrick ten Brink, Marianne Kettunen IVM: Pieter van Beukering, Onno J. Kuik, Luke Brander, Frans Oosterhuis, Dini Helmers ECOSYSTEM ACCOUNTING FOR THE COST OF BIODIVERSITY LOSSES: FRAMEWORK AND CASE STUDY FOR COASTAL MEDITERRANEAN WETLANDS – coordinated by EEA, using a grant provided by BMU Partners and key staff EEA: Jean-Louis Weber, Ronan Uhel, Rania Spyropoulou ETCLUSI: Françoise Breton, Juan Arévalo ETCBD: Dominique Richard University of Nottingham: Roy Haines-Young, Marion Potschin University of Liverpool: Pushpam Kumar University Autonomous of Madrid: Berta Martin, Pedro Lomas, Erik Gomez Tour du Valat: Pere Tomas, Driss Ezzine Danube Delta National Institute: Iulian Nichersu, Eugenia Marin STUDY ON THE ECONOMICS OF CONSERVATION OF FOREST BIODIVERSITY – coordinated by EEA, using a grant provided by BMU Partners and key staff IUCN: Joshua Bishop, Sebastian Winkler University of Cambridge: Katrina Mullan, Andreas Kontoleon EEA: Ronan Uhel, Hans Vos, Jean-Louis Weber, Jock Martin Various organizations have contributed to the first phase of this project with resources, studies, or expertise, notably UK Defra, French MEDAD, IUCN, OECD, UNEP, UNEP- WCMC, and BfN. In particular, we are grateful to the members of the working group for their active support and advice: Martin Brasher, Andrew Balmford, Joshua Bishop, Pascal Blanquet, Eric Blencowe, Katie Bolt, Leon Braat, Guy Duke, Anantha Kumar Duraiappah, Robert Flies, Mark Hayden, Katia Karousakis, Marianne Kettunen, Ariane Labat, Stefan Leiner, Katarina Lipovska, Anil Markandya, Robin Miège, Helen Mountford, Shaun Mowat, Jonathan Murphy, Paulo Nunes, Vanessa Nuzzo, Patrizia Poggi, Ana Rodrigues, Guillaume Sainteny, Hugo-Maria Schally, Burkhard Schweppe-Kraft, Martin Sharman, Anne Teller, Ronan Uhel, Hans Vos, Jean-Louis Weber, Sebastian Winkler, and Karin Zaunberger. We would like to thank in particular UK Defra for providing the results of their various studies on economic valuation, including “An introductory guide to valuing ecosystem services” and French MEDAD for providing the results of their study on coral reefs “La préservation des écosystèmes coralliens: aspects scientifiques, institutionnels et socio-économiques”. All material is available at the <strong>TEEB</strong>-website (see http://ec.europa.eu/ environment/nature/biodiversity/economics/index_en.htm). A variety of reports, articles and other contributions have been received in reply to the web-based call for evidence organized by the European Commission, and will also be used in Phase II. We would like to thank all the respondents to this call. Name First name Organization Alwi Tanya Borneo Tropical Rainforest Foundation Azqueta Diego University of Alcalá Baumgärtner Stefan Leuphana University of Lüneburg Bearzi Giovanni Tethys Research Institute Bellon Maurizio Conservation International Bernstein Johannah Berrisford Kate Bozzi Pierluigi University of Rome “La Sapienza” Brander Keith Brotherton Peter Natural England Bullock Craig Optimize Carraro Carlo University of Venice Cerulus Tanya Departement Leefmilieu, Natuur en Energie (LNE) Vlaanderen Chalad Bruns Pakping Coordination Centre for Natural Resources & Environment management & Environment partnerships Christie Mike Aberystwyth University Cobra Jose European Cork Confederation Cokeliss Zoe Context, London Costanza Robert University of Maryland, USA Danby Ian BASC De Corte Pieter European Landowners Organisation (ELO) Deke Oliver German Advisory Council on Global Change (WBGU) Dieterich Martin University of Hohenheim Dietzsch Laura Amazon Institute of Environmental Research, Brazil Acknowledgements 61
Page 1 and 2:
T h e e c o n o m i c s o f e c o s
Page 3 and 4:
T h e e c o n o m i c s o f e c o s
Page 5 and 6:
F O R E W O R D Biological diversit
Page 7 and 8:
engagement we have received from su
Page 9 and 10:
TA B L E O F C O N T E N T S Forewo
Page 11 and 12: E X E C U T I V E S U M M A R Y Nat
Page 13 and 14: 1B I O D I V E R S I T Y A N D E C
Page 15 and 16: Map 1.1: Environmental conflicts Co
Page 17 and 18: 2B I O D I V E R S I T Y, E C O S Y
Page 19 and 20: European Community reversible, sinc
Page 21 and 22: Map 2.1: Plant species per ecoregio
Page 23 and 24: Table 2.1: Ecosystem services and t
Page 25 and 26: Inaction (COPI) study is measured b
Page 27 and 28: WHAT NEXT? Managing humanity’s de
Page 29 and 30: 3TOWARDS A VALUATION FRAMEWORK The
Page 31 and 32: RECOGNIZING RISKS AND UNCERTAINTY T
Page 33 and 34: which are growing in quantity (henc
Page 35 and 36: Figure 3.2: Valuing ecosystem servi
Page 37 and 38: The scenario used was largely devel
Page 39 and 40: value of the watershed protection p
Page 41 and 42: Figure 3.4: Proposed valuation fram
Page 43 and 44: Figure 3.5: Ecosystem benefits from
Page 45 and 46: vation of tropical forest catchment
Page 47 and 48: forest reserve obligations: a simul
Page 49 and 50: 4FROM ECONOMICS TO POLICIES Society
Page 51 and 52: Klaus Henle, UFZ Payments can be in
Page 53 and 54: European Commission - LIFE05 NAT/SK
Page 55 and 56: In Europe, Portugal has led the use
Page 57 and 58: sustainability reporting. The Carbo
Page 59 and 60: Benefits: Selected Studies. Paris.
Page 61: 4 Policy toolkit: recognizing the c
Page 65 and 66: S Y N O P S E S O F S T U D I E S C
Page 67 and 68: C O R R I G E N D U M Chapter 1 Pag
show all

Interim Report - TEEB

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?