26.03.2015 Views

Management and Performance Review of County Government ...

Management and Performance Review of County Government ...

Management and Performance Review of County Government ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Executive Summary<br />

To finance these deficits, the county has relied heavily on its fund balances. The<br />

General Fund balance fell from $25.4 million in fiscal 1999 to $5.1 million in fiscal 2004,<br />

a drop <strong>of</strong> 80 percent. The <strong>Government</strong> Finance Officers Association recommends that<br />

governments maintain an unreserved fund balance <strong>of</strong> 15 percent <strong>of</strong> general fund<br />

expenditures or two months <strong>of</strong> general fund operating expenditures.<br />

In addition, Jefferson <strong>County</strong>’s Enterprise Fund has been operating in the red.<br />

From fiscal 2000 to fiscal 2004, the airport ran a deficit averaging $1.7 million per year,<br />

while Ford Park’s deficit ballooned to $3.6 million in fiscal 2004. These deficits are partly<br />

financed by transfers from the General Fund, thus increasing its problems.<br />

Jefferson <strong>County</strong> has no comprehensive financial management strategy or longterm<br />

financial plan. It budgets <strong>and</strong> spends funds without analyzing how they further the<br />

county’s goals <strong>and</strong> objectives. MGT found little accountability for spending <strong>and</strong> a<br />

shortsighted focus on current-year finances.<br />

The county should adopt a comprehensive strategy that ties spending to goals,<br />

<strong>and</strong> develop a coordinated process to guide, monitor <strong>and</strong> report on the progress <strong>of</strong> each<br />

department <strong>and</strong> <strong>of</strong>fice. It should abolish the current Budget Office <strong>and</strong> eliminate the<br />

three positions currently assigned to it, replacing it with an Office <strong>of</strong> Strategic Planning<br />

<strong>and</strong> Budget. An experienced budget analyst should be hired to assist its director.<br />

MGT found that the county’s budget <strong>of</strong>ficer constructed the fiscal 2004 <strong>and</strong> 2005<br />

operating budgets strictly as line-item budgets, without budget summaries or narratives<br />

that could explain why money is being appropriated <strong>and</strong> what it is intended to<br />

accomplish.<br />

The county should shift its budgeting process <strong>and</strong> documentation to a<br />

performance basis, prioritizing funding by desired outcomes <strong>and</strong> individual performance<br />

measures for programs <strong>and</strong> departments. All operations, programs <strong>and</strong> processes<br />

Page ES-3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!