02.04.2015 Views

Australian Army Journal

Australian Army Journal

Australian Army Journal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

ORGANISATIONAL CULTURE<br />

From Institution to Occupation:<br />

<strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Army</strong> Culture in Transition<br />

Twenty-five years on, and star rank officers appear to be more comfortable with the<br />

higher rates of pay with individual contracts and salary packaging which includes<br />

a car and mobile phone as fringe benefits. 20 On the other hand, like any high-level<br />

executives in the corporate world, star rank officers’ employment tenure is subject<br />

to termination at short notice.<br />

Military collectivism<br />

The development of military industrial relations in Australia has also seen the rise<br />

of collectivism. Former <strong>Army</strong> officer Graham Pratt noted that collectivism can<br />

embrace all types of employee groupings formed to protect the interests of their<br />

members. 21 Military industrial relations range from the use of quasi trade unions<br />

with the right to undertake industrial action to associations formed for consultative<br />

and lobby purposes such as the RSL. The formation of the Armed Forces<br />

Federation of Australia (ArFFA) in 1984 was related to the then ADF wage freeze,<br />

perceived erosion in conditions, and dissatisfaction with existing procedures.<br />

While acceptance of ‘soft’ collectivism such as lobbying was widely supported,<br />

‘hard’ industrial action, such as the withdrawal of labour, was not. This would seem<br />

to indicate a limited acceptance of an occupational outlook, while at the same time<br />

holding the line on institutional values.<br />

ArFFA, although small in membership (reportedly around 3000) was widely<br />

supported in spirit by the ADF, significantly by the officer corps, and tacitly by the<br />

military hierarchy. It had observer status at DFRT hearings and a regular column<br />

in official service newspapers. It boasted some of the advantages of a trade union<br />

in that it could publicly criticise government policy and directly lobby members<br />

of parliament in contravention of the non-partisan, apolitical and institutional<br />

tradition of the military. ArFFA specifically refused, however, to use the withdrawal<br />

of labour as a means of industrial negotiation. Despite the appointment in 2002<br />

of a prominent figure as patron (Dr Tom Frame, former naval officer, author and<br />

Anglican Bishop to the ADF), ArFFA ceased operations in 2006.<br />

In part, the demise of ArFFA was also due to the establishment of the DFRT which<br />

had an immediate and positive impact on remuneration. 22 With the establishment<br />

of the DFRT an intellectual and legal rigour was introduced to the process which<br />

had been previously absent. The decisions made were well documented and<br />

transparent in their logic. They also enabled military personnel to access standard<br />

<strong>Australian</strong> wage fixing principles and yet also have their own separate tribunal.<br />

It should be noted that despite, or perhaps because of the existence of ArFFA,<br />

<strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Army</strong> <strong>Journal</strong><br />

Culture edition 2013, Volume X, Number 3 Page 195

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!