02.04.2015 Views

Australian Army Journal

Australian Army Journal

Australian Army Journal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

OPINION<br />

On the Culture of the <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Army</strong><br />

Insularity<br />

Insularity is a double-edged trait — and a very strong one, so worth examining on<br />

its own terms. The <strong>Army</strong> is secluded from society. Originally this seclusion was for<br />

society’s protection — it was not accidental that Enlightenment and Romantic-era<br />

barracks (at least in Europe) so closely resembled prisons. Soldiers were then<br />

viewed with the deepest suspicion, and with reason. 31 Now it’s at least as much<br />

about preserving necessarily distasteful (to civilians) military virtues and about a<br />

sincere wish on those civilians’ part not to know too much of what the military does.<br />

Today, the threat Western armies pose to their societies is considerably diminished,<br />

or so runs the conventional wisdom. Certainly no in-barracks Western military<br />

is likely to prey on its own civilian population, individual criminality and weekend<br />

public-house brawling aside. 32 But once deployed, much changes. The fine line of<br />

morality is so hard to see through war’s fog.<br />

Remember Abu Ghraib in 2003–2004? A unit of quite ordinary American Reservists<br />

ran a torture centre for personal amusement. 33 And just maybe they had direction<br />

to do so from the very top levels of the US Government. 34 Or go a little further back<br />

to 1993 in Somalia when the Canadian Airborne Regiment beat a captured local<br />

youth to death for an evening’s amusement. 35<br />

So perhaps the old way of thinking is not so outdated after all. Armies, even the<br />

best armies, remain dangerous to those around them at times; the line between<br />

professional and undisciplined violence can be very fine indeed. And that is a<br />

reason to maintain barriers between armies and societies.<br />

Fortunately our own army has not recently been stained by anything worse<br />

than the tragic accidents of war. The one recent occasion when it was seriously<br />

suggested that our soldiers had done wrong met a public outcry in the soldiers’<br />

favour. 36 It was as though a national institution was threatened. In the event, the<br />

charges were dropped.<br />

The point of this is that people outside the <strong>Army</strong> felt and, in many cases, said<br />

publicly that the <strong>Army</strong> should have a different legal status to the rest of Australia.<br />

And certainly plenty of us agreed with that. This is another side to insularity: society<br />

expects the <strong>Army</strong> to be somewhat inexplicable and to operate under different rules.<br />

The <strong>Army</strong> exists in almost monastic seclusion. When it does come into the public<br />

eye there is careful stage management. ANZAC Day is the best example. Society’s<br />

near-universal goodwill towards soldiers on this ‘one day of the year’ is interesting.<br />

<strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Army</strong> <strong>Journal</strong><br />

Culture edition 2013, Volume X, Number 3 Page 234

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!