02.04.2015 Views

Australian Army Journal

Australian Army Journal

Australian Army Journal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

OPINION<br />

On the Culture of the <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Army</strong><br />

When the <strong>Army</strong> or the <strong>Australian</strong> Defence Force is mentioned in the news,<br />

people expect the word ‘scandal’ to follow. 3 This is perhaps more apparent to an<br />

interested outside observer than to those of us still serving. 4 And don’t forget the<br />

political pressure that comes with it: the present Minister seems to attach a high<br />

priority to changing military culture, placing this on at least an equal footing with<br />

current operations or major acquisitions. 5<br />

Maybe our military culture is bad, and maybe not. That is an argument for another<br />

time and place. Here I intend to describe what I believe to exist without passing<br />

judgement on it. Hopefully my description will be useful to those who must so judge.<br />

It is important, however, for the reader to understand that I have written this article<br />

based on my own experiences and those of others.<br />

I have deliberately omitted two elements from my scope. First, the Canberra staff<br />

officer. These individuals, though nominally still soldiers, live a totally different lives<br />

and have completely different imperatives to their field (and training establishment)<br />

comrades. I had hoped to contrast these with the true <strong>Army</strong> culture described<br />

below, however space precludes this.<br />

Second, I am no expert on the Reserve. So far as <strong>Army</strong> culture applies to part-time<br />

soldiers and units, they are represented below. But I am fully aware that there are<br />

unique complications for Reserve soldiers. It must be the very devil reconciling two<br />

different lives in two different worlds and I must respectfully leave that discussion to<br />

those who know it better.<br />

What are we not?<br />

First a word on what <strong>Army</strong>’s culture is not. Nationalistic blather notwithstanding, the<br />

<strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Army</strong> is hardly unique. In my experience our army is really very similar to the<br />

other Anglo-Western armies of our time: New Zealand, of course, but also the British,<br />

American and Canadian armies. And I also include the United States Marines. 6<br />

Each of those forces has some unique aspects. The New Zealand <strong>Army</strong><br />

has harnessed the warrior spirit of New Zealand’s first people in ways we in<br />

Australia should envy. 7 The British have their long history, their still-strong class<br />

consciousness and all that goes with it (I fondly remember a friend from an ancient<br />

regiment deriding the Royal Tanks as the ‘People’s Cavalry’. His mess dress was<br />

the most gorgeous confection of cloth and bauble I ever saw 8 ). The Canadians,<br />

alone among us, draw on a French heritage as well as a British one. They have the<br />

warm hospitality and the watchful weather eye of the northern peoples. And the<br />

<strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Army</strong> <strong>Journal</strong><br />

Culture edition 2013, Volume X, Number 3 Page 227

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!