02.04.2015 Views

Australian Army Journal

Australian Army Journal

Australian Army Journal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

OPINION<br />

<strong>Army</strong>’s Spirit<br />

Mateship can sometimes be misunderstood and give oxygen to unacceptable<br />

behaviour. It may be misunderstood because the some consider a mate as just<br />

a personal friend or immediate colleague. The some have lost sight, if they had<br />

sight in the first place. A mate includes everyone who has earned the right to<br />

proudly wear the Rising Sun badge. The attitude of a few to ‘never dob in a mate<br />

at any cost’ betrays the collective mateship and spirit our <strong>Army</strong> needs to support<br />

a healthy culture. Walking past or ignoring unacceptable behaviour or low personal<br />

standards is not courageous, it is cowardice. I can provide many examples of<br />

positive mateship. Today we have an increased focus on psychological wounds<br />

and injuries, and for good reason. Often a mate is the first responder, able to lend<br />

a heartfelt hand and give support immediately and then to follow through by<br />

being there and available. This is real mateship and is just one example of mateship<br />

in action.<br />

Never misunderstand what mateship really means.<br />

Opportunity<br />

Opportunity is one of the most practical elements of <strong>Army</strong>’s spirit and is readily<br />

available. I believe that I am a much better person and a soldier because I have<br />

been the recipient of significant opportunity over my long <strong>Army</strong> career. I am<br />

fortunate to be present when the Chief of <strong>Army</strong> presents Federation Stars to<br />

officers and soldiers who have completed 40 years of service. These impressive<br />

officers and soldiers serve as examples of access to opportunity which has<br />

contributed to their longevity in <strong>Army</strong>. As their records of service are read to<br />

the audience it is clear that most have served in multiple trades and corps and<br />

accessed commissioning or other opportunities.<br />

Yet too many leaders focus on the short-term and short-sighted needs of their units<br />

and teams. Too many decision-makers and those who make recommendations<br />

focus on policy without due consideration of the human dimension of the soldiers’<br />

aspirations. This is detrimental to the longer term interests and health of <strong>Army</strong>.<br />

People feel let down when they believe they haven’t been heard or their needs<br />

have been ignored. The two-way trust is broken. Allowing officers and soldiers<br />

reasonable and considered access to achieve their aspirations directly contributes<br />

to a better sense of wellbeing and to <strong>Army</strong>’s spirit.<br />

To quote a peer of mine, ‘trust is a function of character and competence’.<br />

<strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Army</strong> <strong>Journal</strong><br />

Culture edition 2013, Volume X, Number 3 Page 207

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!