02.04.2015 Views

Australian Army Journal

Australian Army Journal

Australian Army Journal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

OPINION<br />

On the Culture of the <strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Army</strong><br />

like one in a prone firing position and be shot accordingly. C’est la guerre. But there<br />

is a line between failing to discern the change of status from active enemy to hors<br />

de combat and murder and we all know it.<br />

That’s why the ‘collateral murder’ video from Iraq was so disturbing. 23<br />

This video recorded an incident that occurred in 2007 and was made public in<br />

2010. Attacking the hostile group in the first place was reasonable enough —<br />

the journalists accompanying them were unfortunate. But later firing on unarmed<br />

people dragging a wounded man from the battlefield was not all right. It might well<br />

have been murder; at the very least it was unchivalrous and dishonourable.<br />

For the best words on modern military chivalry I know, recall Lieutenant Colonel<br />

Collins’ speech to the Royal Irish Regiment battlegroup just before their attack into<br />

Iraq in 2003:<br />

It is a big step to take another human life. It is not to be done lightly. I know<br />

of men who have taken life needlessly in other conflicts. I can assure you<br />

they live with the mark of Cain upon them. 24<br />

He was equally clear on other matters of honour, ordering his soldiers to treat their<br />

fallen foes’ bodies correctly: ‘Allow them dignity in death. Bury them properly and<br />

mark their graves.’ 25 But don’t get the wrong impression. That same short speech<br />

continued with ‘As they die, they will know their deeds have brought them to this<br />

place. Show them no pity.’ 26<br />

Obedience matters too. And our people are nothing if not obedient. It may seem<br />

odd to lump obedience in with chivalry and loyalty as part of honour, but I believe<br />

there is a case for linking these ideals.<br />

Honourable soldiers obey their superiors and are proud of doing so. 27 It is one of<br />

the oddest aspects of army service, this pride in obedience. It suggests a strong<br />

desire to abrogate one’s will to a worthy-seeming superior. This is hardly the<br />

position of a free person. Yet the same soldiers who gladly snap to attention and<br />

follow orders with pride are often strong, independent-minded individuals who<br />

would resist any other attempt to dominate them.<br />

Why do we do it? What is so attractive about this position of intellectual<br />

dependence and subordination? Certainly, after a little time to adjust to civilian life,<br />

close obedience to superiors and formal discipline no longer seem attractive to me.<br />

But at the time I was as keen as anybody else. Why?<br />

<strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Army</strong> <strong>Journal</strong><br />

Culture edition 2013, Volume X, Number 3 Page 231

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!