02.04.2015 Views

Australian Army Journal

Australian Army Journal

Australian Army Journal

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

OPINION<br />

<strong>Army</strong>’s Spirit<br />

Pride<br />

As RSM-A, I speak to more of our people, and to a more diverse <strong>Army</strong> audience,<br />

than the vast majority of individuals in <strong>Army</strong>. I have met very few soldiers who<br />

do not have great pride in <strong>Army</strong> — pride in the past and pride in today. The vast<br />

majority of the <strong>Australian</strong> people also share our great pride, as can be seen in the<br />

popularity of ANZAC Day. <strong>Army</strong>’s obligation is to continue to earn and retain the<br />

pride of our nation.<br />

Every unit has much to be proud of. Our unit leaders should always ensure that<br />

their people know about their unit’s history and the achievements of their unit team,<br />

both individually and in the collective sense, in order to foster pride in the actions<br />

of those from yesterday, today and into the future. Pride in our history offers an<br />

important model to our officers and soldiers and shows them what we expect<br />

them to live up to. Leaders must always display the traits and behaviours that<br />

support pride and utilise it to fortify the unit environment. This is part of leadership<br />

by example.<br />

Faith<br />

Fundamental to faith is trust. In Australia, we have one of the most egalitarian<br />

societies in the world. Our officers and soldiers come from that society making<br />

our <strong>Army</strong> one of the most egalitarian in the world. Military environments are unique<br />

and demand superior/subordinate formal relationships and a willing acceptance<br />

of lawful orders and rules. These are essential to the way <strong>Army</strong> operates. Being<br />

a hierarchical organisation does not mean that two-way engagement is frowned<br />

upon or undesirable. In fact, our people deliver most and best in an environment<br />

of mutual trust. Our people feel the right to be trusted to perform their duties and<br />

meet their responsibilities. We expect our leaders to create a working environment<br />

based on trust. But trust is not automatic and freely given. Superiors are required<br />

to earn the trust of their subordinates through positive leadership, just as<br />

subordinates are required to earn the trust of superiors and colleagues through<br />

high work standards and behaviours.<br />

It has been my experience that all trust must be validated. The willing,<br />

even cheerful, acceptance that trust must always be checked leads to effective<br />

supervision and the maintenance of standards best suited to the character of the<br />

<strong>Australian</strong> soldier. A glance at our grass roots history shows us this.<br />

For trust to flourish in a unit, the principle and practice of tolerance of honest<br />

mistakes and learning must exist. This does not mean the tolerance of negligence<br />

which is never acceptable. Our officers and soldiers must know the difference<br />

<strong>Australian</strong> <strong>Army</strong> <strong>Journal</strong><br />

Culture edition 2013, Volume X, Number 3 Page 205

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!