CIFER®-MATLAB Interfaces: Development and ... - Cal Poly
CIFER®-MATLAB Interfaces: Development and ... - Cal Poly
CIFER®-MATLAB Interfaces: Development and ... - Cal Poly
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
4.3 UH-60 Simulation<br />
The first in-depth validation of the CIFER ® -<strong>MATLAB</strong> interface was based on UH-60 simulation<br />
data provided in the Combined-CIFER-CONDUIT-RIPTIDE Training course 6 . This course was<br />
designed to give engineers a brief introduction to the three programs developed <strong>and</strong> distributed by<br />
the Flight Controls Group, of which CIFER ® is one. The second program is CONDUIT ®7 , which<br />
is designed to optimize a control system around a parametric model for a system. The third<br />
program is RIPTIDE ®8 , which is a simulation program that will allow users to fly systems<br />
modeled in CONDUIT ® . Together, the programs constitute a very powerful control systems<br />
design suite.<br />
The course data was examined for crossover <strong>and</strong> b<strong>and</strong>width characteristics using CIFER ®<br />
utilities. The reference values for these properties were already provided from CONDUIT ®<br />
analysis <strong>and</strong> were used as a check to ensure the correctness of the CIFER ® results. The course<br />
manual provided closed-loop data necessary for b<strong>and</strong>width analysis. In order to investigate<br />
crossover characteristics it was necessary to generate additional simulated flight recordings, in<br />
RIPTIDE ® , of the feedback <strong>and</strong> error channels. Only the roll channel was examined for this<br />
analysis.<br />
As a first step in the analysis, frequency response arithmetic (CIFER ® utility 9) was used to<br />
confirm the consistency of data channels used for error <strong>and</strong> feedback. Equations 4.2 <strong>and</strong> 4.3 show<br />
the relation of the error signal to the input <strong>and</strong> feedback signals for a conventional feedback setup<br />
as depicted in Figure 4.7. Figure 4.8 shows the plot of the error response to stick input compared<br />
to the response solved with the <strong>MATLAB</strong> version of CIFER ® utility 9 using Equation 4.3. The<br />
results overlay precisely, which was expected given that the data comes from a simulation.<br />
37