22.06.2015 Views

CIFER®-MATLAB Interfaces: Development and ... - Cal Poly

CIFER®-MATLAB Interfaces: Development and ... - Cal Poly

CIFER®-MATLAB Interfaces: Development and ... - Cal Poly

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

e = δ − f<br />

[4.2]<br />

e δ f f<br />

= − = 1 −<br />

δ δ δ δ<br />

[4.3]<br />

Figure 4.7: Feedback Block Diagram<br />

Figure 4.8: Error Channel Verification<br />

Using the <strong>MATLAB</strong> version of CIFER ® ’s utility 8 for crossover characteristics, the feedback<br />

response to error in the lateral axis was analyzed. A time delay of 0.0402 was incorporated into<br />

the CIFER crossover analysis because the time delay was not present in the simulated flight<br />

recordings. This modification is not entirely correct because it puts the time delay over the entire<br />

system as opposed to just within the forward loop where it actually occurs. It is, however, a<br />

reasonable approximation. Table 4.1 shows the results from CIFER ® as compared in Unix <strong>and</strong><br />

from Matlab to those printed in the training course manual. There was no discrepancy between<br />

the two difference CIFER ® calculations.<br />

Table 4.1: Roll Gain/Phase Margin Results<br />

CIFER, From Unix CIFER, From <strong>MATLAB</strong> CONDUIT % Difference<br />

Margin Frequency Margin Frequency Margin Frequency Margin Frequency<br />

Gain (1) -10.67 0.41 -10.67 0.41 -10.3 0.48 3.57 13.18<br />

Gain (2) 22.84 13.54 22.84 13.54 24.42 14.85 6.47 8.82<br />

Phase 56.35 2.19 56.35 2.19 57.2 2.13 1.49 2.64<br />

38

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!