08.07.2015 Views

National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife ... - All About Birds

National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife ... - All About Birds

National Survey of Fishing, Hunting, and Wildlife ... - All About Birds

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

lation 6 to 15 years <strong>of</strong> age were derivedfrom the screening interview. Statisticsfor the population 16 years old <strong>and</strong>older come from both the screening<strong>and</strong> detailed interviews. Estimates thatcome from the screening sample arepresented in Appendix B.A. Screening SampleEvery interviewed person inthe screening sample receiveda screening weight that was theproduct <strong>of</strong> the following factors:1. Base Weight. The base weightis the inverse <strong>of</strong> the household’sprobability <strong>of</strong> selection.2 Household NoninterviewAdjustment. The noninterviewadjustment inflates the weightassigned to interiewed householdsto account for householdseligible for interview butfor which no interview wasobtained.3. First-Stage Adjustment. The824 areas designated for oursamples were selected from2,025 such areas <strong>of</strong> the UnitedStates. Some sample areasrepresent only themselves <strong>and</strong>are referred to as self-representing.The remaining areasrepresent other areas similarin selected characteristics <strong>and</strong>are thus designated non-selfrepresenting.The first-stagefactor reduces the component <strong>of</strong>variation arising from samplingthe non-self-representing areas.4. Second-Stage Adjustment. Thisadjustment brings the estimates<strong>of</strong> the total population intoagreement with census-basedestimates <strong>of</strong> the civilian noninstitutionalized<strong>and</strong> nonbarrackmilitary populations for eachstate.B. Sportspersons SampleEvery interviewed person in thesportspersons detailed samplereceived a weight that was theproduct <strong>of</strong> the following factors:1. Screening Weight. This is theperson’s final weight from thescreening sample.2. Sportspersons Stratum Adjustment.This factor inflates theweights <strong>of</strong> persons selected forthe detailed sample to accountfor the subsampling done withineach sportsperson stratum.3. Sportspersons NoninterviewAdjustment. This factor adjuststhe weights <strong>of</strong> the interviewedsportspersons to account forsportspersons selected for thedetailed sample for whomno interview was obtained. Aperson was considered a noninterviewif he or she was notinterviewed in the third wave <strong>of</strong>interviewing.4. Sportspersons Ratio AdjustmentFactor. This is a ratio adjustment<strong>of</strong> the detailed sample tothe screening sample withinthe sportspersons samplingstratum. This adjustment bringsthe population estimates <strong>of</strong>persons aged 16 years old <strong>and</strong>older from the detailed sampleinto agreement with the sameestimates from the screeningsample, which was a muchlarger sample.C. <strong>Wildlife</strong>-Watchers SampleEvery interviewed person in thewildlife-watchers detailed samplereceived a weight that was theproduct <strong>of</strong> the following factors:1. Screening Weight. This is theperson’s final weight from thescreening sample.2. <strong>Wildlife</strong>-Watchers StratumAdjustment. This factor inflatesthe weights <strong>of</strong> persons selectedfor the detailed sample toaccount for the subsamplingdone within each wildlifewatcher stratum.3. <strong>Wildlife</strong>-Watchers NoninterviewAdjustment. This factor adjuststhe weights <strong>of</strong> the interviewedwildlife-watching participantsto account for wildlife watchersselected for the detailed samplefor which no interview wasobtained. A person was considereda noninterview if he or shewas not interviewed in the thirdwave <strong>of</strong> interviewing.4. <strong>Wildlife</strong>-Watchers Ratio AdjustmentFactor. This is a ratioadjustment <strong>of</strong> the detailedsample to the screening samplewithin wildlife-watcherssampling strata. This adjustmentbrings the population estimates<strong>of</strong> persons aged 16 years old<strong>and</strong> older from the detailedsample into agreement withthe same estimates from thescreening sample, which was amuch larger sample.ACCURACY OF THE ESTIMATESA sample survey estimate has two types<strong>of</strong> error: sampling <strong>and</strong> nonsampling.The accuracy <strong>of</strong> an estimate dependson both types <strong>of</strong> error. The nature <strong>of</strong>the sampling error is known given thesurvey design; the full extent <strong>of</strong> thenonsampling error is unknown.NONSAMPLING ERRORFor a given estimator, the differencebetween the estimate that would resultif the sample were to include the entirepopulation <strong>and</strong> the true populationvalue being estimated is known asnonsampling error. There are severalsources <strong>of</strong> nonsampling error thatmay occur during the development orexecution <strong>of</strong> the survey. It can occurbecause <strong>of</strong> circumstances created by theinterviewer, the respondent, the surveyinstrument, or the way the data arecollected <strong>and</strong> processed. For example,errors could occur because:• The interviewer records the wronganswer, the respondent providesincorrect information, the respondentestimates the requestedinformation, or an unclear surveyquestion is misunderstood by therespondent (measurement error).• Some individuals who should havebeen included in the survey framewere missed (coverage error).122 2011 <strong>National</strong> <strong>Survey</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Fishing</strong>, <strong>Hunting</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>Wildlife</strong>-Associated Recreation U.S. Fish <strong>and</strong> <strong>Wildlife</strong> Service <strong>and</strong> U.S. Census Bureau

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!