Figure 7. A Boeing B-757 checklist used by ano<strong>the</strong>r airline.20
Thus, not only <strong>the</strong> hardware affects procedures -- <strong>the</strong> company culture and <strong>the</strong> structure <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>operational environment also bear on procedural development. In <strong>the</strong> following sub-section we havelisted some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>se social factors. This is not an exhaustive list.5.4.1 The Nature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Carrier's OperationsThe operational character <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> airline may dictate certain procedures. For example, a short-hauloperator flying many legs per aircraft per day may wish to minimize ground time. At intermediate stops,<strong>the</strong> pilots may remain in <strong>the</strong> cockpit and keep certain equipment powered in order to facilitate a rapidturn-around at <strong>the</strong> station. A carrier operating identical equipment over fewer, longer legs would call fora complete shutdown at intermediate stations, and <strong>the</strong> pilots would probably depart <strong>the</strong> cockpit. Twodifferent types <strong>of</strong> checklists would have to be designed to support <strong>the</strong> different type <strong>of</strong> operations. Achecklist insensitive to <strong>the</strong> differences would result in a sub-optimal operation, and probably a high rate<strong>of</strong> procedural deviations.5.4.2 Influence <strong>of</strong> a Strong LeaderSome procedures stem from <strong>the</strong> biases and personalities <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> managers and executives. Legend has itthat Captain Eddie Rickenbacker insisted that Eastern Airlines use a QFE altimeter on approaches, inaddition to <strong>the</strong> QNH altimeter, following an altitude-related accident 7 . QFE altimetry existed at EasternAirlines until about three years before its demise 8 . Note that <strong>the</strong> decision to use QFE altimetry onapproach and take<strong>of</strong>f invokes a host <strong>of</strong> procedures peculiar to that airline.5.4.3 Influence <strong>of</strong> Corporate CultureThe term “corporate culture” is a somewhat vague and elusive concept in <strong>the</strong> sociology <strong>of</strong> organizations.Culture refers to <strong>the</strong> underlying values, beliefs, and principals that serve as <strong>the</strong> foundation for anorganizational management system as well as a set <strong>of</strong> management practices and behaviors that exemplifyand reinforce those principals (Deal and Kennedy, 1983). As difficult as corporate culture is to define, itdoes exist and does exert an influence on philosophy and policies <strong>of</strong> operation. Certainly corporationsdo have a culture, stemming largely from <strong>the</strong> nature <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir business, <strong>the</strong>ir geographic location, <strong>the</strong>background <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir founders and present management. Strong cultural influence is portrayed whenvalues and actions are consistent. This consistency serves to improve performance and efficiency. Forexample, one airline that we surveyed has a culture that places a high value on discipline, order, anddevotion to duty. This, we believe, leads to an operating concept that is rigidly procedurized and highlystandardized. The flight crews “religiously” adhere to <strong>the</strong>ir “SOPA” (SOP Amplified), which is <strong>the</strong>“bible” by which <strong>the</strong> airline is operated. It is a meticulously detailed description <strong>of</strong> procedures and tasks.An example <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> extent <strong>of</strong> this company’s procedures can be seen in <strong>the</strong>ir system for altitude calloutsprior to target altitude. Unlike most airlines which require a callout 1000 feet prior to <strong>the</strong> target altitude,<strong>the</strong> SOPA mandates two altitude callouts, <strong>the</strong> first at 2000 feet, <strong>the</strong>n a second one at 1000 feet.5.5 ECONOMICALLY-DRIVEN INFLUENCESThe cockpit is not oblivious to market and economic pressures (Monan and Cheaney, 1990). But <strong>the</strong>extent to which economic forces may have penetrated <strong>the</strong> flight deck and affected cockpit procedures maynot be obvious. For convenience, we will divide <strong>the</strong>se forces into two parts: market, or public relationsprocedures; and resource conservation procedures.5.5.1 Public Relations <strong>Procedures</strong>Most companies require <strong>the</strong> cockpit crew to make periodic public address (PA) announcements to <strong>the</strong>passengers in <strong>the</strong> interest <strong>of</strong> public relations. Although PA’s are always at <strong>the</strong> captain's discretion, weare aware <strong>of</strong> at least one airline that specifies an altitude (on descent) at which <strong>the</strong> PA announcement is to7 QFE altimeter displays aircraft altitude in reference to airport elevation. QNH altimeter displays aircraft altitude inreference to mean sea level.8 To our knowledge, only one U.S. carrier (American Airlines) still uses <strong>the</strong> QFE altimeter in domestic operations.21
- Page 2 and 3: TABLE OF CONTENTSSUMMARY ..........
- Page 4 and 5: 1. INTRODUCTIONWhen we try to pick
- Page 6 and 7: Hendrick (1987) states that human f
- Page 8 and 9: influenced by the individual philos
- Page 10 and 11: 3. THE FOURTH P: PRACTICES3.1. AN E
- Page 12 and 13: To summarize, the ultimate factor t
- Page 14 and 15: Humor. Humor is closely related to
- Page 16 and 17: technical deficiencies, induce work
- Page 18 and 19: operations and the philosophy of th
- Page 20 and 21: 5.3 MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONSMergers
- Page 24 and 25: e made. Consider, also, the followi
- Page 26 and 27: flight operations, the philosophy m
- Page 28 and 29: 5.7.3 Technique and PoliciesAny giv
- Page 30 and 31: For example, one company constantly
- Page 32 and 33: 6. ISSUES IN PROCEDURE DESIGN6.1 CO
- Page 34 and 35: solution involves “anchoring” a
- Page 36 and 37: On August 19, 1980, a Saudi Arabian
- Page 38 and 39: 3. The procedures allow the other a
- Page 40 and 41: coordination of tasks between agent
- Page 42 and 43: Similarly, it has been a common pra
- Page 44 and 45: 7.1.3 Structure of ProceduresAs men
- Page 46 and 47: mission simulation (see Wiener et a
- Page 48 and 49: felt that this is an efficient tech
- Page 50 and 51: esponse. The PF, therefore, can con
- Page 52 and 53: 7.5.1 Cross-fleet StandardizationCr
- Page 54 and 55: 1. Training department (for both pi
- Page 56 and 57: REFERENCESAviation Week and Space T
- Page 58 and 59: Perrow, C. (1986). Complex organiza
- Page 60 and 61: APPENDICESAppendix 1 - Guidelines f
- Page 62 and 63: 14. In managing automated cockpits,
- Page 64 and 65: APPENDIX 3 - QUESTIONS ASKED OF FLI
- Page 66 and 67: APPENDIX 5 - QUESTIONS ASKED DURING
- Page 68 and 69: 8. Change in operational environmen