10.07.2015 Views

rsg_book_2013

rsg_book_2013

rsg_book_2013

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Mammalscomposition of the groups released. Prices varied between species and highprices limited the numbers of the rarer species that could be released.National regulations for controlling foot-and-mouth disease required that theanimals came from areas where both the disease and potential carriers (e.g.buffalo) were absent (the ‘green zone’); or, for those captured elsewhere, thatthey were tested for foot-and-mouth disease by the veterinary authorities aftercapture. The animals came from southern Zimbabwe, the Midlands, or Doma innorth-east Zimbabwe. Except for animals from auction sales, most weretransported to their release site immediately after being caught by professionalgame capture teams, usually during the cooler dry-season months. Bushbuckwere individually crated during transport, but other species travelled in groups.At the release site, the animals were freed into a boma (pre-release pen) withhigh (approximately 2 m) sides of black, opaque plastic sheeting, and measuringc. 50 m x 50 m. The initial groups were kept in the boma for up to 14 days, duringwhich they were given food (commercial game pellets and cotton seed) anddrinking water. They were freed by removing part of the boma side and lettingthem find their own way out. After the apparent success of the early releases, andgiven the difficulty of confining large antelopes in even high-sided bomas (somejumped the sides), later release groups were confined to the boma for just onenight, to prompt group cohesion, before release. Later still, some less financiallyvaluableanimals (zebra) or solitary species (bushbuck) were freed immediatelyon arrival at the ranch (“free-released”).More valuable species (waterbuck and sable antelope) were released inShangangwe game-fenced enclosure of c. 20 km 2 on De Beers ranch. Although itcontained cattle, this enclosure was surrounded by a 2 m, 10-stand, electric fencethat served to prevent the wild herbivores leaving the ranch, and to facilitate theirTable 1. The total numbers of each species released on the two ranches, therange of group sizes and the years when the releases occurred(R = Re-introduction; S = Supplementation)Release RanchNumber inSpeciesYears of releasesShangani De Beersrelease groupZebra 101 S 89 S 8 - 25 1991 - 1997Eland 94 R 102 R 10 - 41 1991 - 1997Wildebeest 0 30 * R 7 - 23 1998 - 1999Giraffe 6 R 0 6 1997Sable antelope 5 S 28 * R 5 - 18 1993 - 1998Waterbuck 0 43 * R 2 - 15 1995 - 199805 S1997Bushbuck-58 S 24 * S2011* Released in the Shangangwe enclosure of c.20 km 2139

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!