rsg_book_2013

Recommendations

Info

FishReferencesCarmona-Catot, G., Moyle, P. B., Aparicio, E., Crain, P. K., Thompson, L. C. &García-Berthou, E. (2010) Brook trout removal as a conservation tool to restoreEagle Lake rainbow trout. North American Journal Fisheries Management30:1315 - 1323Carmona-Catot, G., Moyle, P. B. & Simmons, R. E. (2011) Long-term captivebreeding does not necessarily prevent reestablishment: lessons learned fromEagle Lake rainbow trout. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 22: 325 - 342Moyle, P. B. (2002) Inland fishes of California. University of California Press,Berkeley, USAMoyle, P. B., Quinones, R. M., Katz, J. V. E. & Weaver, J. (in press) Fish Speciesof Special Concern for California. 3rd edition. Sacramento: California Departmentof Fish and Wildlife.Pustejovsky, T. (2007) A conservation plan for Pine Creek and Eagle Lakerainbow trout. Lassen County Resource Advisory Council. Susanville, California,USA, pp 9025
FishSetting the stage for conservation success: largescalewatershed renovation and re-introduction ofcutthroat trout in the Rocky Mountain region ofthe USACarter G. Kruse 1 , Pat Clancey 2 , Scott Barndt 3 , Kirk Patten 4 & Bradley Shepard 51 - Aquatic Resource Coordinator, Turner Enterprises, Inc./Turner EndangeredSpecies Fund, 1123 Research Drive, Bozeman, MT 59718, USAcarter.kruse@retranches.com2 - Fisheries Biologist, Montana Fish Wildlife and Parks, PO Box 1336, Ennis, MT59729, USA pclancey@mt.gov3 - Ecosystem Staff Officer, Custer and Gallatin National Forests, PO Box 130,Bozeman, MT 59771, USA sbarndt@fs.fed.us4 - Assistant Chief, Research and Management, New Mexico Department of Gameand Fish, 1 Wildlife Way, Santa Fe, NM 87507, USA kirk.patten@state.nm.us5 - Senior Aquatics Scientist, Wildlife Conservation Society, 65 9 th Street IslandDrive, Livingston, MT 59047, USA bshepard@wcs.orgIntroductionThe cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii) is native to the Rocky Mountain andcoastal areas of the western United States (US) and is classified into as many as14 subspecies (e.g., Behnke, 1992). Seven major inland subspecies of cutthroattrout historically occupied most accessible cold water environments from Canadato southern New Mexico. However, all subspecies have incurred significant rangereductions primarily due to competition and introgression with introducedsalmonids, but also from habitat degradation and exploitation (Young, 1995;Shepard et al., 2005; Pritchard & Cowley, 2006). Lahontan (O. c. henshawi) andgreenback (O. c. stomias) cutthroat trout are listed as threatened under the USEndangered Species Act (ESA) and the other inland subspecies have either beenpetitioned for listing under the ESA or are considered species of concern by stateand federal agencies.We focus on the northern- and southernmost inland subspecies, althoughconsiderations are likelysimilar for all subspecies.Westslope cutthroat trout(WCT, O. c. lewisi) werehistorically the mostwidespread subspecies -occupying an estimated90,800 km of streams andrivers throughout theColumbia and MissouriReleased westslope cutthroat trout inbasins headwaters - butCherry Creek - September 2012 the range of genetically26
Page 1 and 2: Global Re-introductionPerspectives:
Page 4: The designation of geographical ent
Page 7 and 8: CONTENTSLetter from Shaikha Al Dhah
Page 9 and 10: Shaikha Al Dhaheri,Executive Direct
Page 13: An overview and analysis of the re-
Page 17 and 18: Invertebratesas a UK species byincr
Page 19 and 20: Invertebratesrestore hydrological c
Page 21 and 22: InvertebratesThe translocation of t
Page 23 and 24: Invertebratesrelease sites for over
Page 25 and 26: FishInvertebratesExamining genetic
Page 27 and 28: FishInvertebratesyears of negative
Page 29 and 30: FishInvertebratesdisrupting benefic
Page 31 and 32: Fishwith irregular shores and botto
Page 33 and 34: Fish Stocking ofbroodfishes innatur
Page 35 and 36: FishSuccess of projectHighly Succes
Page 37 and 38: Fish22Goal 4: Removal of alienfish
Page 39: FishMajor lessons learned Although
Page 43 and 44: FishTemporary fish movement barrier
Page 45 and 46: Fish30years (2002 - 2004). By 2005
Page 47 and 48: Fishin an adaptive manner and led t
Page 49 and 50: Amphibians Indicator 2:Thedistribut
Page 51 and 52: AmphibiansMajor difficulties faced
Page 53 and 54: Reptilessnakes to the Conecuh Natio
Page 55 and 56: Reptilesindividuals studied near th
Page 57 and 58: ReptilesExperimental translocation
Page 59 and 60: ReptilesImplementation: We did an i
Page 61 and 62: ReptilesSuccess of projectHighly Su
Page 63 and 64: Reptilesappropriate managementand i
Page 66 and 67: Reptiles Small enough VHFtagswith l
Page 68 and 69: BirdsRe-introduction of vinaceous A
Page 70 and 71: BirdsThe door is closed at night(to
Page 72 and 73: Birdsmore aggressive ones, and re e
Page 74 and 75: Birds Sub-Goal 1: To keep acaptive
Page 76 and 77: Birdsdaytime. All individuals were
Page 78 and 79: BirdsRe-introduction of brown-heade
Page 80 and 81: BirdsAviaries were constructed to b
Page 82 and 83: Birds High rates of reproduction an
Page 84 and 85: Birdsdifferent locations (see: www.
Page 86 and 87: Birdsthat include natural nesting c
Page 88 and 89: BirdsBrekke, P., Bennett, P. M., Sa
Page 90 and 91:
Birdsacted as the source for anaugm
Page 92 and 93:
Birdsfood was provided in andaround
Page 94 and 95:
Birds The re-introduction program p
Page 96 and 97:
Birdsconsidered a ‘flagship’spe
Page 98 and 99:
Birdsestablished in the U.S. toaid
Page 100 and 101:
BirdsRe-introduction of the orienta
Page 102 and 103:
Birdsfledged, with 29 of them still
Page 104 and 105:
BirdsIUCN (1998) Guidelines for Re-
Page 106 and 107:
Birdscontrol on ShanganiRanch, so t
Page 108 and 109:
Birdswhen cattle were rounded up. S
Page 110 and 111:
BirdsBrown treecreeper re-introduct
Page 112 and 113:
Birdsvegetation cover throughkangar
Page 114 and 115:
Birdstreecreeper nataldispersers. T
Page 116 and 117:
Birds The Norman Wettenhall Foundat
Page 118 and 119:
Birds Goal 4: Use the bluebird as a
Page 120 and 121:
BirdsMajor difficultiesfaced In 200
Page 122 and 123:
MammalsRe-introduction and recovery
Page 124 and 125:
MammalsImplementation:Captive breed
Page 126 and 127:
Mammalsrecognized thatinterbreeding
Page 128 and 129:
Mammalsre-introduced population of
Page 130 and 131:
Mammals Continued research and moni
Page 132 and 133:
Mammalsyears. In 1998 the UnitedSta
Page 134 and 135:
Mammals Poor husbandry in livestock
Page 136 and 137:
Mammalsof two connected reintroduce
Page 138 and 139:
MammalsOverall mortality duringthe
Page 140 and 141:
MammalsRe-introduction of the brown
Page 142 and 143:
Mammals~1,700 km 2 for supporting a
Page 144 and 145:
MammalsMajor lessons learned Import
Page 146 and 147:
MammalsTranslocation of Hawaiian mo
Page 148 and 149:
Mammalsthe scale of translocations.
Page 150 and 151:
Mammals Weaned pups aremost amenabl
Page 152 and 153:
MammalsRe-introduction and suppleme
Page 154 and 155:
Mammalscomposition of the groups re
Page 156 and 157:
MammalsShangangwe enclosurewere ini
Page 158 and 159:
MammalsRe-introduction of Père Dav
Page 160 and 161:
Mammalssangunalis and Setariaviridi
Page 162 and 163:
MammalsSuccess of projectHighly Suc
Page 164 and 165:
Mammalsfor Lichtenstein’s hartebe
Page 166 and 167:
Mammalsdensity in excess of 0.05/km
Page 168 and 169:
MammalsGoals Goal 1: Development of
Page 170 and 171:
Mammalst 43 =2.85, P
Page 172 and 173:
Mammalsor put themselves at risk re
Page 174 and 175:
MammalsEstablishing new populations
Page 176 and 177:
MammalsSeveral studies have resulte
Page 178 and 179:
Mammals Conventional single-species
Page 180 and 181:
MammalsPark and JaldaparaWildlife S
Page 182 and 183:
MammalsMajor lessons learned Good u
Page 184 and 185:
MammalsGoals Goal 1: Establish andm
Page 186 and 187:
MammalsThe rapid herd growth at Tom
Page 188 and 189:
MammalsSuccess of projectHighly Suc
Page 190 and 191:
Mammalsspecies in over twentyyears.
Page 192 and 193:
Mammalsgazelles (1 male:4females) w
Page 194 and 195:
MammalsOstrowski, S. & Williams, J.
Page 196 and 197:
Mammals Goal 4: To provide social a
Page 198 and 199:
MammalsHowever, the LOW elk populat
Page 200 and 201:
MammalsReferencesBellhouse, T. & Br
Page 202 and 203:
MammalsSuccess Indicators Indicator
Page 204 and 205:
MammalsMajor lessons learned The ro
Page 206 and 207:
Mammals Goal 4: An increase ofa num
Page 208 and 209:
Mammals Uncontrolled losses of anim
Page 210 and 211:
Mammals Indicator 3: Get practical
Page 212 and 213:
MammalsRelease of wood bison from t
Page 214 and 215:
Mammalsrecreational fee hunt thatge
Page 216 and 217:
MammalsJust prior to delisting TESF
Page 218 and 219:
MammalsRominger, E. M., H. A. Whitl
Page 220 and 221:
MammalsEnvironment Protectionand Bi
Page 222 and 223:
Mammalscamera traps have beendeploy
Page 224 and 225:
Mammalsdirections. This reorganizat
Page 226 and 227:
Mammalsstatus of existing imperiled
Page 228 and 229:
MammalsMajor difficultiesfaced Esta
Page 230 and 231:
MammalsThe release of northeast Bor
Page 232 and 233:
Mammalsconsidering the proximity of
Page 234 and 235:
MammalsMajor difficulties faced Mai
Page 236 and 237:
Mammalsthis goal. However, the conf
Page 238 and 239:
Mammalsrehabilitated chimpanzees an
Page 240 and 241:
Mammals2010). All fully adult sized
Page 242 and 243:
Mammalsopen and topographically uni
Page 244 and 245:
MammalsPreliminary observations fro
Page 246 and 247:
Mammalsspecial emphasis on the wool
Page 248 and 249:
Mammalslong season of relative scar
Page 250 and 251:
MammalsRe-introduction of bobcats t
Page 252 and 253:
Mammalsfacility on the mainland for
Page 254 and 255:
Mammals The use of locally adapted,
Page 256 and 257:
PlantsRe-introduction of Manglietia
Page 258 and 259:
PlantsImplementation:From 2008 to 2
Page 260 and 261:
PlantsSuccess of projectHighly Succ
Page 262 and 263:
Plantscoastal belt resulting inthe
Page 264 and 265:
Plantsstep to execute theprojects.
Page 266 and 267:
Plants Plantation maintenance funds
Page 268 and 269:
Plantsenvironment at a Sand Hillsit
Page 270 and 271:
Plantsplantation site. Eastern port
Page 272 and 273:
PlantsFirst steps for the conservat
Page 274 and 275:
Plantstesting the germplasm quality
Page 276 and 277:
Plantsplanted sites show good survi
Page 278 and 279:
PlantsConservation introduction of
Page 280 and 281:
Plantsnatural population.Ongoing mo
Page 282 and 283:
PlantsExperimental translocation of
Page 284 and 285:
Plantscovering a proportion ofemerg
Page 286 and 287:
Plants The highly effective 2 m hig
Page 288 and 289:
Plantsmost outlier for thespecies,
Page 290 and 291:
Plantssnails, slugs or caterpillars
Page 292 and 293:
PlantsConservation introduction of
Page 294 and 295:
Plantsdistribution of Bakersfield c
Page 296 and 297:
PlantsReferencesCypher, B. L., B. D
show all

rsg_book_2013

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?