Traditional Probation & Intensive Supervision ... - Ottawa County

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Completed ProbationAttachment VParticipant Interview ResultsAnswer: Traditional• Something with less rules and less invasion in my life• I hated the curfew and the other demands with ISP, however, I feel that ISP was probably the best thing for me• I know people who have been through the drug court programs (in other counties) and the program is just toodisruptive to people’s lives. I thought that ISP was pretty intense and I don’t think that increasing the intensityfurther will benefit anyone.Answer: More Intense• I feel this would be the most effective because I’ve had it myself (ISP). It allows some freedom but still holdsyou accountable• You need it to be more intense in order to really changeDid Not Complete ProbationAnswer: Traditional• It’s tough enough (2)• ISP was very strict and it hurt my personal situation (job) because they demanded constant contact and I was notable to always do this. However, I feel that ISP would be helpful for drunk drivers.• I have been on both ISP and traditional and I feel that ISP was too intrusive (curfew, people coming to myhouse) and that just made me resentfulAnswer: More Intense• It is important that probation helps you get better, and the traditional program has not worked on many of myfriends because they still drink. I feel like everyone should be required to do the more intense program.• It would help more because ISP is more of a babysitter; ISP doesn’t help you with your real problems
Attachment WProbationer Responses Pertaining to Treatment/CounselingCompletedProbationTraditionalDid NotCompleteProbationCompletedProbation 1ISPDid NotCompleteProbationTotal of AllProbationersWere you ordered to attend counseling/treatment as part of your probationsentence?Yes 85.3% (64) 87.5% (7) 100.0% (8) 75.0% (6) 85.9% (85)No 14.7% (11) 12.5% (1) 0.0% (0) 25.0% (2) 14.1% (14)If order to attend counseling/treatment, doyou feel you had issues that requiredcounseling/treatment?Yes 59.4% (38) 57.1% (4) 75.0% (6) 66.7% (4) 61.2% (52)No 40.6% (26) 42.9% (3) 25.0% (2) 33.3% (2) 38.8% (33)If ordered to attend counseling/treatment,did you find the counseling/treatmenthelpful?Yes 70.3% (45) 71.4% (5) 62.5% (5) 66.7% (4) 69.4% (59)No 26.6% (17) 28.6% (2) 37.5% (3) 16.7% (1) 27.1% (23)Unsure 3.1% (2) 0.0% (0) 0.0% (0) 16.7% (1) 3.5% (3)If you didn’t find the counseling/treatmenthelpful, do you think it would have helpedyou resolve your issues if it had beenrequired for a longer period of time?Yes 0.0% (0) 0.0% (0) 0.0% (0) 0.0% (0) 0.0% (0)No 100.0% (17) 100.0% (2) 100.0% (3) 100.0% (1) 100.0% (23)If ordered to attend counseling/treatment,did you complete all of your requiredcounseling/treatment?Yes 96.9% (62) 71.4% (5) 100.0% (8) 83.3% (5) 94.1% (80)No 3.1% (2) 28.6% (2) 0.0% (0) 16.7% (1) 5.9% (5)If ordered to attend counseling/treatment, doyou feel the counseling/treatment you didreceive will help you stay out of the criminaljustice system in the future?Yes 75.0% (48) 71.4% (5) 75.0% (6) 83.3% (5) 75.3% (64)No 25.0% (16) 28.6% (2) 25.0% (2) 16.7% (1) 24.7% (21)Source: Participant Telephone Interviews1. One (1) of the 9 ISP probationers who completed probation refused to answer survey questions in this section of the survey
Page 2 and 3:
2007 County Board of CommissionersD
Page 4 and 5:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARYThe Traditional Pr
Page 6 and 7:
EVALUATION METHODOLOGIESThe Plannin
Page 8 and 9:
Table 3AgeTraditional ISP Total17-2
Page 10 and 11:
Operational PerformanceAn assessmen
Page 12 and 13:
3. Probation ConditionsOffenders wh
Page 14 and 15:
Of those probationers who received
Page 16 and 17:
Average Number of Visits8765432106.
Page 18 and 19:
Average Number of Tests1.41.21.00.8
Page 20 and 21:
If an offender commits a probation
Page 22 and 23:
F. Completion RatesThe program comp
Page 24 and 25:
1. Overall Recidivism RateEach prob
Page 26 and 27:
3. Recidivism by Type of Criminal B
Page 28 and 29:
5. Recidivism by Level of Participa
Page 30 and 31:
7. Number of Recidivism OffensesThe
Page 32 and 33:
Probationer InterviewsThe primary r
Page 34 and 35:
Program CostThe major expense of op
Page 36 and 37:
Recommendation:In order to improve
Page 38 and 39:
Recommendation:Continue to collect
Page 40 and 41:
Attachment AORGANIZATION & WORK FLO
Page 42 and 43:
Attachment CSTRATEGIC OUTLINEProbat
Page 44 and 45:
Attachment EDATABASE DESIGNProbatio
Page 46 and 47:
Home OfficeDate Visit Visit PBT DT
Page 48 and 49:
Attachment HSampling ProceduresInte
Page 50 and 51: Attachment IOverall DemographicsTot
Page 52 and 53: Attachment KAssessment ScoresTradit
Page 54 and 55: Attachment MAgency Survey1. Clients
Page 56 and 57: Attachment ODrug and Alcohol Tests
Page 58 and 59: Attachment QType of New Offenses Wh
Page 60 and 61: Attachment SDescription of Convicti
Page 62 and 63: Attachment TRecidivism by ADE Asses
Page 64 and 65: Attachment U58th District Court - P
Page 66 and 67: Attachment VParticipant Interview R
Page 76 and 77: Did Not Complete ProbationAttachmen
Page 102 and 103: Attachment XProbationer Responses P
Page 104 and 105: Attachment ZProbationer Responses P
Page 106 and 107: Attachment BBTotal Program Cost (IS
Page 108: Ottawa County Planning and Grants D
show all

Traditional Probation & Intensive Supervision ... - Ottawa County

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?