Traditional Probation & Intensive Supervision ... - Ottawa County

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Attachment VParticipant Interview Results• The Judge asked me why I was here again; I received jail time and it was made clear to me that prison was thenext step• I thought the Judge was a little harsh, but my probation was helpful• I was given a sentence• They made sure I didn’t get in trouble; they checked up on me• They gave me an appropriate sentence and then worked with me to make sure I was successfulAnswer: No• They just went through a checklistResponses – ISP ProbationersCompletedProbationDid NotCompleteProbationTotalYes 87.5% (7) 71.4% (5) 80.0% (12)No 12.5% (1) 28.6% (2) 20.0% (3)Total 100.0% (8) 100.0% (7) 100.0% (15)Completed ProbationAnswer: Yes• The Judge gave me a sentence and made me go to counseling and meet with my probation officer• They were fair, but they made me do what was necessary to make up for my actions• They made sure I was responsible• They checked on me at home, gave me a curfew, fines, and sent me to counseling• I had to pay fines• They made me realize that I had more potential and that I was heading down a dead end path. They put the fearof God in me, but they were positive about it.• They made me stay cleanAnswer: No• I felt that the sentence for my actions was somewhat ruthlessDid Not Complete ProbationAnswer: Yes• They were fair in dealing with my situation• They required a lot of me like AA and meetings with my probation officer. I feel it was fair and effective• I was on ISP for one year and I had to abide by the rules and regulations or go to jail• I was given a sentence• I had jail timeAnswer: No• I held myself accountable for my actions. The Judge and probation officer did their jobs, but I held myselfaccountable more than they did• I do not feel they held me accountable for the right things; I feel that I didn’t need to be held accountable for myactions
Attachment VParticipant Interview ResultsQuestion:Do you feel that probationers need more alcohol and/or drug testing to hold them accountable? Why?Responses – Traditional ProbationersCompletedProbationDid NotCompleteProbationTotalYes 35.6% (26) 37.5% (3) 49.4% (40)No 47.9% (35) 50.0% (4) 22.2% (18)Depends 16.4% (12) 12.5% (1) 28.4% (23)Total 100.0% (73) 100.0% (8) 100.0% (81)Completed ProbationAnswer: Yes• They should do it more often to catch people who drink or do drugs in between scheduled testing (10)• Young kids get away with way too much; they do things that are not acceptable. Probation officers need to doa lot more checking up on young kids; they need to be more strict. Young kids and parents should be incounseling, there are a lot of things going on; you’d be surprised at the number of gangs.• But I feel that counseling is what gets to the root of the problem, testing only “rats” them out• Drinking is wrong to mix with driving and must be stopped/enforced by the law• They should keep the level of testing the same throughout the program, at the end they test less• The younger people didn’t seem to be ready to give up the lifestyle (drinking and doing drugs)• I was only tested once and if I had been tested more, it may have prevented the drinking that I was doing whileon probation• They should test people every time they come in• People know when they will be tested in the current system; it should be more random to hold peopleaccountable• More would be helpful to keep people out of the system.• If they are constantly getting in trouble for it• It should be at least once a week and random to catch the cheaters. I never got tested for drugs or alcohol, butthe threat was always there. I think my probation officer knew I wasn’t going to cheat and that I was honest.• As it is now, the only way you would get caught is if you got in a bar fight or were stupid enough to drink thenight before the test• I wasn’t tested every time I went to see my probation officer and I think it would have been more helpful to betested every time if not more• There shouldn’t be any room for errorAnswer: No• Enough testing to hold people accountable is already in place (18)• I feel that it’s effective the way it is now and that it should be up to the probation officer to decide how muchtesting to give each person because they see them most often• People will always find a way to cheat the system; it’s up to the person to want to change• I wasn’t going to cheat the system, so the amount of testing I received was fine• They do a good job now [This person was never tested once by her probation officer. She said that she gotsober because her probation officer was so nice and was her friend]• The SCRAM unit was positive for me. No less tests, not sure about more. The testing seems to work the wayit is. My uncle did tests regularly and it worked for him• I feel it’s pretty effective the way it is, but it should be more random• If they had more testing, it would be to catch more people and make more money.• I didn’t have a drug or alcohol problem but they tested me because they get more money every time they testsomeone• I think it would be too expensive to check more frequently. I think the County should really educate peoplemore about what can happen if you are in an accident while drinking. If you kill or injure someone that can
Page 2 and 3:
2007 County Board of CommissionersD
Page 4 and 5:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARYThe Traditional Pr
Page 6 and 7:
EVALUATION METHODOLOGIESThe Plannin
Page 8 and 9:
Table 3AgeTraditional ISP Total17-2
Page 10 and 11:
Operational PerformanceAn assessmen
Page 12 and 13:
3. Probation ConditionsOffenders wh
Page 14 and 15:
Of those probationers who received
Page 16 and 17:
Average Number of Visits8765432106.
Page 18 and 19:
Average Number of Tests1.41.21.00.8
Page 20 and 21:
If an offender commits a probation
Page 22 and 23:
F. Completion RatesThe program comp
Page 24 and 25:
1. Overall Recidivism RateEach prob
Page 26 and 27:
3. Recidivism by Type of Criminal B
Page 28 and 29:
5. Recidivism by Level of Participa
Page 30 and 31:
7. Number of Recidivism OffensesThe
Page 32 and 33:
Probationer InterviewsThe primary r
Page 34 and 35:
Program CostThe major expense of op
Page 36 and 37:
Recommendation:In order to improve
Page 38 and 39: Recommendation:Continue to collect
Page 40 and 41: Attachment AORGANIZATION & WORK FLO
Page 42 and 43: Attachment CSTRATEGIC OUTLINEProbat
Page 44 and 45: Attachment EDATABASE DESIGNProbatio
Page 46 and 47: Home OfficeDate Visit Visit PBT DT
Page 48 and 49: Attachment HSampling ProceduresInte
Page 50 and 51: Attachment IOverall DemographicsTot
Page 52 and 53: Attachment KAssessment ScoresTradit
Page 54 and 55: Attachment MAgency Survey1. Clients
Page 56 and 57: Attachment ODrug and Alcohol Tests
Page 58 and 59: Attachment QType of New Offenses Wh
Page 60 and 61: Attachment SDescription of Convicti
Page 62 and 63: Attachment TRecidivism by ADE Asses
Page 64 and 65: Attachment U58th District Court - P
Page 66 and 67: Attachment VParticipant Interview R
Page 76 and 77: Did Not Complete ProbationAttachmen
Page 100 and 101: Completed ProbationAttachment VPart
Page 102 and 103: Attachment XProbationer Responses P
Page 104 and 105: Attachment ZProbationer Responses P
Page 106 and 107: Attachment BBTotal Program Cost (IS
Page 108: Ottawa County Planning and Grants D
show all

Traditional Probation & Intensive Supervision ... - Ottawa County

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?