Traditional Probation & Intensive Supervision ... - Ottawa County

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Attachment QType of New Offenses While on ProbationTraditionalType of ProbationISPTotalsNumber ofViolatorsTotal Numberof NewOffensesAverageNumber ofNewOffenses PerViolatorNumber ofViolatorsAverageTotal Number ofNumber of NewNew Offenses Offenses PerViolatorNumber ofViolatorsTotalNumber ofNewOffensesAverageNumber ofNewOffensesPer ViolatorAssault/Domestic ViolenceOWI/Alcohol ConvictionPossession/Use of DrugsRetail Fraud/LarcenyOther New Offense 1Total1 Includes MDOP, DWLS, Fleeing/Eluding, Etc.19 19 1.00 1 1 1.00 20 20 1.0046 48 1.04 12 15 1.25 58 63 1.0916 16 1.00 5 5 1.00 21 21 1.0012 16 1.33 4 4 1.00 16 20 1.2530 32 1.07 6 6 1.00 36 38 1.06123 131 1.07 28 31 1.11 151 162 1.07Percent2.001.801.601.401.201.000.800.600.400.200.001.331.04 1.071.00 1.00Assault/Domestic ViolencePossession/Use of DrugsOther New Offense1.001.251.001.00OWI/Alcohol ConvictionRetail Fraud/Larceny1.001.001.091.00Traditional ISP Total of Both Programs1.251.06Source: Department of Probation and Community CorrectionsPrepared by: Ottawa County Planning Department (08/11/06)
Attachment RProbation Violations and New Offenses During the ProgramCompletedProbationType of ProbationTraditionalDid NotCompleteProbationCompletedProbationDid NotCompleteProbationCompletedProbationDid NotCompleteProbationProbation Violations1 Probation Violation 103 (49.8%) 104 (50.2%) 22 (39.3%) 34 (60.7%) 125 (47.5%) 138 (52.5%)2 Probation Violations 26 (31.0%) 58 (69.0%) 9 (26.5%) 25 (73.5%) 35 (29.7%) 83 (70.3%)3 Probation Violations 0 (0.0%) 16 (100.0%) 5 (21.7%) 18 (78.3%) 5 (12.8%) 34 (87.2%)4 Probation Violations 0 (0.0%) 6 (100.0%) 0 (0.0%) 8 (100.0%) 0 (0.0%) 14 (100.0%)5 Probation Violations 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 1 (33.3%) 2 (66.7%) 1 (33.3%) 2 (66.7%)One New Offense1 New Offense, 0 Probation Violations 0 (0.0%) 3 (100.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 3 (100.0%)1 New Offense, 1 Probation Violation 19 (31.1%) 42 (68.9%) 1 (14.3%) 6 (85.7%) 20 (29.4%) 48 (70.6%)1 New Offense, 2 Probation Violations 3 (16.7%) 15 (83.3%) 1 (14.3%) 6 (85.7%) 4 (16.0%) 21 (84.0%)1 New Offense, 3 Probation Violations 1 (14.3%) 6 (85.7%) 3 (50.0%) 3 (50.0%) 4 (30.8%) 9 (69.2%)1 New Offense, 4 Probation Violations 0 (0.0%) 2 (100.0%) 0 (0.0%) 1 (100.0%) 0 (0.0%) 3 (100.0%)1 New Offense, 5 Probation Violations 0 (0.0%) 2 (100.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 2 (100.0%)Two New Offenses2 New Offenses, 1 Probation Violation 0 (0.0%) 1 (100.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 1 (100.0%)2 New Offenses, 2 Probation Violations 0 (0.0%) 5 (100.0%) 1 (50.0%) 1 (50.0%) 1 (14.3%) 6 (85.7%)2 New Offenses, 3 Probation Violations 0 (0.0%) 1 (100.0%) 0 (0.0%) 1 (100.0%) 0 (0.0%) 2 (100.0%)2 New Offenses, 4 Probation Violations 1 (50.0%) 1 (50.0%) 0 (0.0%) 2 (100.0%) 1 (25.0%) 3 (75.0%)2 New Offenses, 5 Probation Violations 0 (0.0%) 1 (100.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 1 (100.0%)Three New Offenses3 New Offenses, 1 Probation Violation 0 (0.0%) 1 (100.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 1 (100.0%)3 New Offenses, 2 Probation Violations 0 (0.0%) 2 (100.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 2 (100.0%)3 New Offenses, 3 Probation Violations 0 (0.0%) 3 (100.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 3 (100.0%)Total 153 (36.3%) 269 (63.7%) 43 (28.7%) 107 (71.3%) 196 (34.3%) 376 (65.7%)ISPTotalSource: Department of Probation and Community CorrectionsPrepared by: Ottawa County Planning Department (04/26/07)
Page 2 and 3:
2007 County Board of CommissionersD
Page 4 and 5:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARYThe Traditional Pr
Page 6 and 7:
EVALUATION METHODOLOGIESThe Plannin
Page 8 and 9: Table 3AgeTraditional ISP Total17-2
Page 10 and 11: Operational PerformanceAn assessmen
Page 12 and 13: 3. Probation ConditionsOffenders wh
Page 14 and 15: Of those probationers who received
Page 16 and 17: Average Number of Visits8765432106.
Page 18 and 19: Average Number of Tests1.41.21.00.8
Page 20 and 21: If an offender commits a probation
Page 22 and 23: F. Completion RatesThe program comp
Page 24 and 25: 1. Overall Recidivism RateEach prob
Page 26 and 27: 3. Recidivism by Type of Criminal B
Page 28 and 29: 5. Recidivism by Level of Participa
Page 30 and 31: 7. Number of Recidivism OffensesThe
Page 32 and 33: Probationer InterviewsThe primary r
Page 34 and 35: Program CostThe major expense of op
Page 36 and 37: Recommendation:In order to improve
Page 38 and 39: Recommendation:Continue to collect
Page 40 and 41: Attachment AORGANIZATION & WORK FLO
Page 42 and 43: Attachment CSTRATEGIC OUTLINEProbat
Page 44 and 45: Attachment EDATABASE DESIGNProbatio
Page 46 and 47: Home OfficeDate Visit Visit PBT DT
Page 48 and 49: Attachment HSampling ProceduresInte
Page 50 and 51: Attachment IOverall DemographicsTot
Page 52 and 53: Attachment KAssessment ScoresTradit
Page 54 and 55: Attachment MAgency Survey1. Clients
Page 56 and 57: Attachment ODrug and Alcohol Tests
Page 60 and 61: Attachment SDescription of Convicti
Page 62 and 63: Attachment TRecidivism by ADE Asses
Page 64 and 65: Attachment U58th District Court - P
Page 66 and 67: Attachment VParticipant Interview R
Page 76 and 77: Did Not Complete ProbationAttachmen
Page 100 and 101: Completed ProbationAttachment VPart
Page 102 and 103: Attachment XProbationer Responses P
Page 104 and 105: Attachment ZProbationer Responses P
Page 106 and 107: Attachment BBTotal Program Cost (IS
Page 108:
Ottawa County Planning and Grants D
show all

Traditional Probation & Intensive Supervision ... - Ottawa County

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?