Attachment Z<strong>Probation</strong>er Responses Pertaining to RecidivismCompleted<strong>Probation</strong> 1<strong>Traditional</strong>Did NotComplete<strong>Probation</strong>Completed<strong>Probation</strong> 2ISPDid NotComplete<strong>Probation</strong> 3Total of All<strong>Probation</strong>ersOverall, do you feel that being on probationwill help you to stay out of trouble in thefuture?Yes 89.0% (65) 75.0% (6) 87.5% (7) 71.4% (5) 86.5% (83)No 11.0% (8) 25.0% (2) 12.5% (1) 28.6% (2) 13.5% (13)Is there any aspect of probation that was nothelpful that you feel could be improved?Yes 28.8% (21) 50.0% (4) 25.0% (2) 42.9% (3) 31.3% (30)No 71.2% (52) 50.0% (4) 75.0% (6) 57.1% (4) 68.7% (66)Hypothetically, if you were convicted ofanother offense, would you prefer a moreintense program that includes treatment,accountability, and positive reinforcementfrom judges and probation officers or wouldyou prefer the traditional method ofprobation?More Intense 15.1% (11) 25.0% (2) 25.0% (2) 28.6% (2) 17.7% (17)<strong>Traditional</strong> 68.5% (50) 37.5% (3) 50.0% (4) 71.4% (5) 64.6% (62)Depends on the situation 16.4% (12) 0.0% (0) 0.0 (0) 0.0% (0) 12.5% (12)No preference 0.0% (0) 37.5% (3) 25.0% (2) 0.0% (0) 5.2% (5)Source: Participant Telephone Interviews1. Two (2) of the 75Ttraditional probationers who completed probation refused to answer survey questions in this section of the survey2. One (1) of the 9 ISP probationers who completed probation refused to answer survey questions in this section of the survey3. One (1) of the 8 ISP probationers who did not complete probation refused to answer survey questions in this section of the survey
Attachment AATotal Program Cost (<strong>Traditional</strong> <strong>Probation</strong>)Salary and FringeBenefitsPercentSalaries andof Salary andFringes AttributedFringes AttributedTo <strong>Traditional</strong>To <strong>Traditional</strong><strong>Probation</strong><strong>Probation</strong>Salaries and Fringe BenefitsKristi Gebben (<strong>Probation</strong> Officer) $59,475.72 10.0% $5,947.57Leticia Gonzalez-Ortiz (<strong>Probation</strong> Officer) $52,240.52 10.0% $5,224.05Joan Gordillo (<strong>Probation</strong> Secretary) $28,599.32 100.0% $28,599.32Kathy Kensil (<strong>Probation</strong> Officer) $61,303.80 100.0% $61,303.80Tracey Lehnen (<strong>Probation</strong> Officer) $43,621.90 10.0% $4,362.19Julie Mahn (<strong>Probation</strong> Secretary) $13,829.19 50.0% $6,914.60Andrea Mendoza (<strong>Probation</strong> Secretary) $53,675.37 100.0% $53,675.37Yale Pope (<strong>Probation</strong> Officer) $69,777.15 10.0% $6,977.72Gary Ramsden (<strong>Probation</strong> Officer) $71,704.90 100.0% $71,704.90James Robbert (<strong>Probation</strong> Officer) $70,298.75 100.0% $70,298.75Jodi Salacina (Assistant <strong>Probation</strong> Director) $83,281.57 75.0% $62,461.18David Schipper (<strong>Probation</strong> Director) $97,860.01 10.0% $9,786.00Cathy Shaw (<strong>Probation</strong> Officer) $69,512.05 50.0% $34,756.03Lee Soncrant (<strong>Probation</strong> Officer) $60,562.62 10.0% $6,056.26Kelli Taylor (<strong>Probation</strong> Officer) $68,309.16 100.0% $68,309.16Alma Valenzuela (<strong>Probation</strong> Officer) $61,645.06 50.0% $30,822.53Lynn Vanderveen (<strong>Probation</strong> Oficer) $70,696.13 100.0% $70,696.13Timothy VanDyke (<strong>Probation</strong> Officer) $70,850.89 100.0% $70,850.89Alanna Vanhoeven (<strong>Probation</strong> Support) $38,287.27 25.0% $9,571.82Judge Jonas $153,434.12 7.7% 1 $11,814.43Judge Knoll $148,061.03 7.7% 1 $11,400.70Judge Post $153,034.86 9.2% 1 $14,079.21Judge Kloote $153,414.12 5.0% 1 $7,670.71Court Recorder (for Judge Jonas) $49,756.84 7.7% $3,831.28Court Recorder (for Judge Knoll) $49,756.84 7.7% $3,831.28Court Recorder (for Judge Post) $49,756.84 9.2% $4,577.63Court Recorder (for Judge Kloote) $49,756.84 5.0% $2,487.84Assistant Prosecuting Attorneys (13 individuals) 2 $1,440,810.24 14.0% $201,713.43Total Salaries and Fringes $3,393,313.11 27.7% $939,724.78Miscellaneous ExpensesSupplies/Operating $43,133.17 3Administrative Indirect Cost 4 $102,127.12 3Other Expenses 5 $79,136.85 3Drug Testing 6 $26,850.35Court Appointed Defense Attorneys 7 $127,508.80Jail Cost 8 $3,419,882.85Total Miscellaneous Expenses $3,798,639.14Total Annual Cost (Salaries, Fringe Benefits, and Miscellaneous) $4,738,363.921 The percent of each Judge's salary and fringes attributed to <strong>Traditional</strong> <strong>Probation</strong> is estimated based on total caseload since the amount of time spent (per case) is nottracked. These percentages were provided by the Director of <strong>Probation</strong> and Community Corrections.2 The salary and fringes are for 13 prosecuting attorneys; the percent of their salary and fringes attributed to <strong>Traditional</strong> <strong>Probation</strong> is estimated based on total caseloadsince the amount of time spent (per case) or by each prosecuting attorney is not tracked.3 Because the District Court budget does not reflect the amount of each line item that is attributed to <strong>Traditional</strong> <strong>Probation</strong>, these figures are based on a calculation ofeach budget line item multiplied by the rate of 23.47% since 23.47% of the total salaries/fringe benefits from this budget are attributed to employees who work in<strong>Traditional</strong> <strong>Probation</strong>.4 Annual costs for office maintenance and <strong>County</strong> services5 Includes mileage, conference expenses, telephone, and data processing6 Calculation based on the cost per test ($2.35) multiplied by the average number of tests (11,425.68) administered during a one year period to <strong>Traditional</strong> probationers7Calculation based on the total amount paid ($696,769.38) by <strong>Ottawa</strong> <strong>County</strong> to District Court Appointed Attorneys during 2005 multiplied by the percent (18.3%) ofDistrict Court cases resulting in <strong>Traditional</strong> probation in 20058Calculation based on the average number of jail days (33.9) served by a <strong>Traditional</strong> probationer multiplied by the cost per jail day ($44.50); the resulting number($1,508.55) is then multiplied by the number of <strong>Traditional</strong> probationers (2,267) during 2005.ReimbursementsCourt Filing Fees and Crime Victim Restitution Fees 9 $389,602.00Bond Forfeitures, Bond Fees, and Fees From Ordinance Violations 9 $251,950.45Cash Flow Funds From The State For Drunk Driving Arrests 9 $12,107.94Fees Paid By Credit Bureaus For Access To Data 9 $1,760.25Drug Testing Reimbursements $67,014.00State Dollars That Pay For Judges Salaries 10 $40,513.51Court Appointed Attorney Fees Reimbursed by <strong>Traditional</strong> <strong>Probation</strong>ers 11 $34,303.66Total Annual Reimbursements $797,251.81Total Net Annual Cost To <strong>County</strong> (Less Reimbursements) $3,941,112.119Because the District Court budget does not reflect the amount of each line item that is attributed to <strong>Traditional</strong> <strong>Probation</strong>, these figures are based on a calculation ofeach budget line item multiplied by the rate of 23.47% since 23.47% of the total salaries/fringe benefits from this budget are attributed to employees who work in<strong>Traditional</strong> <strong>Probation</strong>.10 90.1% of each Judge's salary and fringes are paid with state funds11 Calculation based on the total amount reimbursed ($187,451.68) to <strong>Ottawa</strong> <strong>County</strong> by all people with District Court cases who utilized the services of District CourtAppointed Attorneys in 2005 multiplied by the percent (18.3%) of District Court cases resulting in <strong>Traditional</strong> <strong>Probation</strong> in 2005Source: Department of <strong>Probation</strong> and Community Corrections, District Court, Fiscal Services, IT DepartmentPrepared by: Planning Department (07/02/07)
Change language