Traditional Probation & Intensive Supervision ... - Ottawa County

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Attachment XProbationer Responses Pertaining to Drug and Alcohol TestingCompletedProbation 1TraditionalDid NotCompleteProbationCompletedProbation 2ISPDid NotCompleteProbationTotal of AllProbationersWe have heard that some probationers whowere ordered to abstain from alcohol and/ordrugs cheated on the tests. Is this true?Yes 47.9% (35) 62.5% (5) 75.0% (6) 25.0% (2) 49.5% (48)No 23.3% (17) 12.5% (1) 0.0% (0) 12.5% (1) 19.6% (19)Unaware of this 28.8% (21) 25.0% (2) 25.0% (2) 62.5% (5) 30.9% (30)Did you have a probation requirement toabstain from alcohol and/or drugs?Yes 93.2% (68) 87.5% (7) 100.0% (8) 100.0% (8) 93.8% (91)No 6.8% (5) 12.5% (1) 0.0% (0) 0.0% (0) 6.2% (6)If had to abstain from alcohol/drug use, didyou ever drink or do drugs while onprobation?Yes 30.9% (21) 57.1% (4) 12.5% (1) 50.0% (4) 33.0% (30)No 69.1% (47) 42.9% (3) 87.5% (7) 50.0% (4) 67.0% (61)Do you feel the judge and/or your probationofficer held you accountable for youractions?Yes 91.8% (67) 87.5% (7) 87.5% (7) 71.4% (5) 89.6% (86)No 8.2% (6) 12.5% (1) 12.5% (1) 28.6% (2) 10.4% (10)Do you feel that probationers need morealcohol and/or drug testing to hold themaccountable?Yes 35.6% (26) 37.5% (3) 25.0% (2) 0.0% (0) 32.3% (31)No 47.9% (35) 50.0% (4) 75.0% (6) 57.1% (4) 51.0% (49)Depends on the person 16.4% (12) 12.5% (1) 0.0% (0) 42.9% (3) 16.7% (16)Source: Participant Telephone Interviews1. Two (2) of the 75 Traditional probationers who completed probation refused to answer survey questions in this section of the survey2. One (1) of the 9 ISP probationers who completed probation refused to answer survey questions in this section of the survey
Attachment YProbationer Responses Pertaining to Relationships with Officers and JudgesCompletedProbationTraditionalDid NotCompleteProbationCompletedProbationISPDid NotCompleteProbationTotal of AllProbationersDo you feel the judge was truly concernedabout helping you so you wouldn’t end up introuble again?Yes 70.7% (53) 50.0% (4) 77.7% (7) 75.0% (6) 70.0% (70)No 22.7% (17) 50.0% (4) 0.0% (0) 25.0% (2) 23.0% (23)Unsure 6.6% (5) 0.0% (0) 22.2% (2) 0.0% (0) 7.0% (7)Did your relationship with the judgenegatively or positively affect your attitude?Positively 60.0% (45) 62.5% (5) 66.6% (6) 62.5% (5) 61.0% (61)Negatively 25.3% (19) 37.5% (3) 11.1% (1) 37.5% (3) 26.0% (26)Neither 14.7% (11) 0.0% (0) 22.2% (2) 0.0% (0) 13.0% (13)Did your relationship with your probationofficer negatively or positively affect yourattitude?Positively 89.3% (67) 50.0% (4) 66.6% (6) 62.5% (5) 82.0% (82)Negatively 6.7% (5) 25.0% (2) 11.1% (1) 25.0% (2) 10.0% (10)Neither 4.0% (3) 25.0% (2) 22.2% (2) 12.5% (1) 8.0% (8)Did your relationship with any other courtpersonnel negatively or positively affect yourattitude?Positively 16.0% (12) 12.5% (1) 0.0% (0) 0.0% (0) 13.0% (13)Negatively 9.3% (7) 0.0% (0) 11.1% (1) 25.0% (2) 10.0% (10)No Other Relationships 74.7% (56) 87.5% (7) 88.9% (8) 75.0% (6) 77.0% (77)Source: Participant Telephone Interviews
Page 2 and 3:
2007 County Board of CommissionersD
Page 4 and 5:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARYThe Traditional Pr
Page 6 and 7:
EVALUATION METHODOLOGIESThe Plannin
Page 8 and 9:
Table 3AgeTraditional ISP Total17-2
Page 10 and 11:
Operational PerformanceAn assessmen
Page 12 and 13:
3. Probation ConditionsOffenders wh
Page 14 and 15:
Of those probationers who received
Page 16 and 17:
Average Number of Visits8765432106.
Page 18 and 19:
Average Number of Tests1.41.21.00.8
Page 20 and 21:
If an offender commits a probation
Page 22 and 23:
F. Completion RatesThe program comp
Page 24 and 25:
1. Overall Recidivism RateEach prob
Page 26 and 27:
3. Recidivism by Type of Criminal B
Page 28 and 29:
5. Recidivism by Level of Participa
Page 30 and 31:
7. Number of Recidivism OffensesThe
Page 32 and 33:
Probationer InterviewsThe primary r
Page 34 and 35:
Program CostThe major expense of op
Page 36 and 37:
Recommendation:In order to improve
Page 38 and 39:
Recommendation:Continue to collect
Page 40 and 41:
Attachment AORGANIZATION & WORK FLO
Page 42 and 43:
Attachment CSTRATEGIC OUTLINEProbat
Page 44 and 45:
Attachment EDATABASE DESIGNProbatio
Page 46 and 47:
Home OfficeDate Visit Visit PBT DT
Page 48 and 49:
Attachment HSampling ProceduresInte
Page 50 and 51:
Attachment IOverall DemographicsTot
Page 52 and 53: Attachment KAssessment ScoresTradit
Page 54 and 55: Attachment MAgency Survey1. Clients
Page 56 and 57: Attachment ODrug and Alcohol Tests
Page 58 and 59: Attachment QType of New Offenses Wh
Page 60 and 61: Attachment SDescription of Convicti
Page 62 and 63: Attachment TRecidivism by ADE Asses
Page 64 and 65: Attachment U58th District Court - P
Page 66 and 67: Attachment VParticipant Interview R
Page 76 and 77: Did Not Complete ProbationAttachmen
Page 100 and 101: Completed ProbationAttachment VPart
Page 104 and 105: Attachment ZProbationer Responses P
Page 106 and 107: Attachment BBTotal Program Cost (IS
Page 108: Ottawa County Planning and Grants D
show all

Traditional Probation & Intensive Supervision ... - Ottawa County

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?