Traditional Probation & Intensive Supervision ... - Ottawa County

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Attachment TRecidivism by ADE Assessment ScoreRecidivatedType of ProbationTraditionalDid NotRecidivateRecidivatedDid NotRecidivateRecidivatedDid NotRecidivateAlcohol Addiction (ADE 1)Alcohol (ADE 1), Drug (ADE 1) 33.3% (2) 66.7% (4) 0.0% (0) 100.0% (1) 28.6% (2) 71.4% (5)Alcohol (ADE 1), Drug (ADE 2) 33.3% (1) 66.7% (2) ─ ─ 33.3% (1) 66.7% (2)Alcohol (ADE 1), Drug (ADE 3) 20.0% (1) 80.0% (4) ─ ─ 20.0% (1) 80.0% (4)Alcohol (ADE 1), Drug (ADE 4) ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─Alcohol (ADE 1), Drug (ADE 5) 0.0% (0) 100.0% (1) ─ ─ 0.0% (0) 100.0% (1)Alcohol Addiction (ADE 2)Alcohol (ADE 2), Drug (ADE 1) 14.3% (1) 85.7% (6) ─ ─ 14.3% (1) 85.7% (6)Alcohol (ADE 2), Drug (ADE 2) 50.0% (1) 50.0% (1) 0.0% (0) 100.0% (1) 33.3% (1) 66.7% (2)Alcohol (ADE 2), Drug (ADE 3) ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─Alcohol (ADE 2), Drug (ADE 4) ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─Alcohol (ADE 2), Drug (ADE 5) ─ ─ ─ ─ ─ ─Alcohol Addiction (ADE 3)Alcohol (ADE 3), Drug (ADE 1) 14.7% (5) 85.3% (29) 25.0% (1) 75.0% (3) 15.8% (6) 84.2% (32)Alcohol (ADE 3), Drug (ADE 2) 15.8% (3) 84.2% (16) 0.0% (0) 100.0% (1) 15.0% (3) 85.0% (17)Alcohol (ADE 3), Drug (ADE 3) 0.0% (0) 100.0% (7) 0.0% (0) 100.0% (1) 0.0% (0) 100.0% (8)Alcohol (ADE 3), Drug (ADE 4) 0.0% (0) 100.0% (1) ─ ─ 0.0% (0) 100.0% (1)Alcohol (ADE 3), Drug (ADE 5) 0.0% (0) 100.0% (1) ─ ─ 0.0% (0) 100.0% (1)Alcohol Addiction (ADE 4)Alcohol (ADE 4), Drug (ADE 1) 15.8% (6) 84.2% (32) 9.1% (1) 90.9% (10) 14.3% (7) 85.7% (42)Alcohol (ADE 4), Drug (ADE 2) 9.0% (7) 91.0% (71) 7.1% (1) 92.9% (13) 8.7% (8) 91.3% (84)Alcohol (ADE 4), Drug (ADE 3) 5.3% (1) 94.7% (18) 0.0% (0) 100.0% (4) 4.3% (1) 95.7% (22)Alcohol (ADE 4), Drug (ADE 4) 0.0% (0) 100.0% (2) ─ ─ 0.0% (0) 100.0% (2)Alcohol (ADE 4), Drug (ADE 5) 25.0% (1) 75.0% (3) 33.3% (1) 66.7% (2) 28.6% (2) 71.4% (5)Alcohol Addiction (ADE 5)Alcohol (ADE 5), Drug (ADE 1) 5.3% (1) 94.7% (18) 0.0% (0) 100.0% (4) 4.3% (1) 95.7% (22)Alcohol (ADE 5), Drug (ADE 2) 6.5% (3) 93.5% (43) 15.8% (3) 84.2% (16) 9.2% (6) 90.8% (59)Alcohol (ADE 5), Drug (ADE 3) 17.6% (3) 82.4% (14) 0.0% (0) 100.0% (10) 11.1% (3) 88.9% (24)Alcohol (ADE 5), Drug (ADE 4) 12.5% (1) 87.5% (7) 50.0% (1) 50.0% (1) 20.0% (2) 80.0% (8)Alcohol (ADE 5), Drug (ADE 5) 27.3% (3) 72.7% (8) 0.0% (0) 100.0% (2) 23.1% (3) 76.9% (10)Total 12.2% (40) 87.8% (288) 10.4% (8) 89.6% (69) 11.9% (48) 88.1% (357)ISPTotalSource: Department of Probation and Community CorrectionsPrepared by: Ottawa County Planning Department (05/14/07)
Name of Probationer:Attachment U58th District Court - Probation EvaluationParticipant Interview QuestionsDate of Interview:Completed ProbationTraditional ProbationFailed to CompleteISP ProbationRELATIONAL/ATTITUDEDo you feel the judge was truly concerned about helping you so you wouldn’t end up in trouble again? Why or why not?Did your relationship with the judge negatively or positively affect your attitude? How?Did your relationship with your probation officer negatively or positively affect your attitude? How?Did your relationship with any other court personnel negatively or positively affect your attitude? How?TREATMENTWere you ordered to attend counseling/treatment as part of your probation sentence?If Yes:Do you feel you had issues that required counseling/treatment?Did you find the counseling/treatment helpful?If yes, how was it helpful?If no, do you think the counseling/treatment would have helped you resolve your issues if it had been requiredfor longer period of time and/or more frequently? Why or why not?Did you complete all of your required counseling/treatment? If not, why?Do you feel the counseling/treatment you did receive will help you stay out of the criminal justice systemin the future?If No:Do you feel you had a problem that would have required counseling/treatment?
Page 2 and 3:
2007 County Board of CommissionersD
Page 4 and 5:
EXECUTIVE SUMMARYThe Traditional Pr
Page 6 and 7:
EVALUATION METHODOLOGIESThe Plannin
Page 8 and 9:
Table 3AgeTraditional ISP Total17-2
Page 10 and 11:
Operational PerformanceAn assessmen
Page 12 and 13: 3. Probation ConditionsOffenders wh
Page 14 and 15: Of those probationers who received
Page 16 and 17: Average Number of Visits8765432106.
Page 18 and 19: Average Number of Tests1.41.21.00.8
Page 20 and 21: If an offender commits a probation
Page 22 and 23: F. Completion RatesThe program comp
Page 24 and 25: 1. Overall Recidivism RateEach prob
Page 26 and 27: 3. Recidivism by Type of Criminal B
Page 28 and 29: 5. Recidivism by Level of Participa
Page 30 and 31: 7. Number of Recidivism OffensesThe
Page 32 and 33: Probationer InterviewsThe primary r
Page 34 and 35: Program CostThe major expense of op
Page 36 and 37: Recommendation:In order to improve
Page 38 and 39: Recommendation:Continue to collect
Page 40 and 41: Attachment AORGANIZATION & WORK FLO
Page 42 and 43: Attachment CSTRATEGIC OUTLINEProbat
Page 44 and 45: Attachment EDATABASE DESIGNProbatio
Page 46 and 47: Home OfficeDate Visit Visit PBT DT
Page 48 and 49: Attachment HSampling ProceduresInte
Page 50 and 51: Attachment IOverall DemographicsTot
Page 52 and 53: Attachment KAssessment ScoresTradit
Page 54 and 55: Attachment MAgency Survey1. Clients
Page 56 and 57: Attachment ODrug and Alcohol Tests
Page 58 and 59: Attachment QType of New Offenses Wh
Page 60 and 61: Attachment SDescription of Convicti
Page 64 and 65: Attachment U58th District Court - P
Page 66 and 67: Attachment VParticipant Interview R
Page 76 and 77: Did Not Complete ProbationAttachmen
Page 100 and 101: Completed ProbationAttachment VPart
Page 102 and 103: Attachment XProbationer Responses P
Page 104 and 105: Attachment ZProbationer Responses P
Page 106 and 107: Attachment BBTotal Program Cost (IS
Page 108: Ottawa County Planning and Grants D
show all

Traditional Probation & Intensive Supervision ... - Ottawa County

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?