Clean Sweep Programs - US Environmental Protection Agency

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Summary of Colorado Waste Pesticide Disposal ProgramIn 1994, Colorado State University Cooperative Extension (CSUCE) sponsored a pilot project forthe collection and disposal of unwanted pesticides. Funding for the project was provided by an EPA grantfor $75,000 (Section 319 of the <strong>Clean</strong> Water Act) and a $50,000 in-kind match. Brochures and registrationforms were distributed to11,000 potential participants with a return of 67 registering for the event.Initially, there was some question of liability under CERCLA. CSUCE was acting as a broker for thehazardous waste and could be legally liable for any accidents associated with the collection and disposalevent. It was agreed to permit CSUCE to assume the role.In 1995, a competitive bid was conducted to hire a contractor. The competitive bid contained arequirement for the contractor to pick up the pesticides from the participants’ sites and to accept hazardouswaste generator status to limit the liability of CSUCE. ENSCO won the contract and visited each site topick up the designated pesticides that had been identified and tagged. Colorado used the contractor-pickup-methodrather than having participants transport the pesticides to a central site. This minimized the effortneeded by the participant and the probability of accidents on the way to the site.ENSCO transferred most of the pesticides to a holding facility in El Dorado, Arkansas. Dioxincontainingmaterials were transported directly to the incinerator in Coffeyville, Kansas. From El Dorado,selected products were transferred to Oklahoma for landfilling. Some mercury products were transferred toCanada for stabilization and landfilling. A total of 17,000 pounds of pesticides were collected from 67 sites.In 1997, the Department of Agriculture encouraged participation in an agricultural pesticide disposalprogram where the contractor serviced the entire state and was responsible for all aspects of the programincluding advertising, registration and appointments, collection, and disposal. This program required thecontractor to pick up waste at the participant’s site and did not allow the participant to transport the waste.This format is based on the State’s interpretation of EPA regulations. The collection programs conducted in1996 through 1999 all operated like this. All collection programs, 1996 through 1999, were paid for by theparticipants. It is anticipated that future collection programs will be operated by private contractors and thetotal cost will be paid for by the participants. Currently, the average cost is $2.25 to $2.65 per pound, anddepends on the total amounts of pesticides collected during the program.
YearColorado Table 1 - Quantity of Pesticides CollectedQuantity of Pesticides(pounds)Number ofParticipantsAverage Quantity ofPesticides per Participant(pounds/participant.)1995 17, 000 67 2541996 00 NA1997 33, 910 114 2971998 00 NA1999 17, 755 44 4042000 15, 833 43 368TOTAL 84,498 268 315Information on program cost is not available.NA = not applicable
Page 1 and 2:
ForewordThe states and some countie
Page 3 and 4:
Table of ContentsSECTIONFOREWORDTAB
Page 5 and 6:
List of Figures and TablesNumber Ti
Page 7 and 8:
State IndexAlabamaAlaskaArizonaArka
Page 9 and 10:
Executive SummaryParticipants. Alth
Page 11 and 12:
Executive Summarypounds. States wan
Page 14 and 15:
Section 1 IntroductionFor the past
Page 16:
The Clean Sweep Reportshort-term or
Page 19 and 20:
Section 1 Introductionextensive and
Page 21 and 22:
Section 1 Introductionfunded, conti
Page 23 and 24:
Section 2 Clean Sweep Program Opera
Page 25 and 26:
Section 2Clean Sweep Program Operat
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Section 2Clean Sweep Program Operat
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42: Section 2 Clean Sweep Program Opera
Page 43 and 44: Section 2 Clean Sweep Program Opera
Page 45 and 46: Section 3 Clean Sweep Program Resul
Page 51 and 52: Table 11 Total Amount of Pesticides
Page 57 and 58: 44Table 13 Specific Pesticides Trac
Page 59 and 60: Table 14 Quantity of the Most Commo
Page 61 and 62: Section 4 Challenges and Opportunit
Page 71 and 72: Section 5 Observations5.2 The unit
Page 73 and 74: Section 5ObservationsTable 17: Tota
Page 75 and 76: Section 5 Observations5.3 Reliable
Page 77 and 78: Section 5 Observationsamount annual
Page 79 and 80: Appendix INOTES on STATE “ATA GLA
Page 81 and 82: ALABAMA AT A GLANCESince 1994 Alaba
Page 83 and 84: ALASKA AT A GLANCEAlaska conducts s
Page 85 and 86: ARIZONA AT A GLANCEArizona does not
Page 87 and 88: ARKANSAS AT A GLANCEThe Arkansas St
Page 89 and 90: CALIFORNIA AT A GLANCESince 1989 Ca
Page 91: COLORADO AT A GLANCEAn EPA grant an
Page 95 and 96: Summary of Connecticut Waste Pestic
Page 97 and 98: Summary of Delaware Waste Pesticide
Page 99 and 100: Summary of Florida Waste Pesticide
Page 101 and 102: GEORGIA AT A GLANCEGeorgia has cond
Page 103 and 104: HAWAII AT A GLANCEHawaii conducted
Page 105 and 106: IDAHO AT A GLANCEIdaho’s permanen
Page 107 and 108: ILLINOIS AT A GLANCESince its first
Page 109 and 110: Illinois attempted a swap program i
Page 111 and 112: Summary of Indiana Waste Pesticide
Page 113 and 114: IOWA AT A GLANCESince 1991 Iowa has
Page 115 and 116: YearIowa Table 1 - Quantity of Pest
Page 117 and 118: Summary of Kansas Waste Pesticide D
Page 119 and 120: KENTUCKY AT A GLANCEKentucky conduc
Page 121 and 122: LOUISIANA AT A GLANCELouisiana coll
Page 123 and 124: MAINE AT A GLANCEMaine conducted it
Page 125 and 126: MARYLAND AT A GLANCEThe Maryland De
Page 127 and 128: MASSACHUSETTS AT A GLANCEMassachuse
Page 129 and 130: MICHIGAN AT A GLANCEMichigan’s pe
Page 131 and 132: MINNESOTA AT A GLANCESince 1989 Min
Page 133 and 134: Minnesota Table 1 - Quantity of Pes
Page 135 and 136: Summary of Mississippi Waste Pestic
Page 137 and 138: Summary of Missouri Waste Pesticide
Page 139 and 140: Summary of Montana Waste Pesticide
Page 141 and 142: Summary of Nebraska Waste Pesticide
Page 143 and 144:
Summary of Nevada Waste Pesticide D
Page 145 and 146:
Summary of New Hampshire Waste Pest
Page 147 and 148:
Summary of New Jersey Waste Pestici
Page 149 and 150:
New Jersey Table 3 - County-by-Coun
Page 151 and 152:
Summary of New Mexico Waste Pestici
Page 153 and 154:
Summary of New York Waste Pesticide
Page 155 and 156:
churches, schools and businesses. P
Page 157 and 158:
NORTH CAROLINA AT A GLANCENorth Car
Page 159 and 160:
North Carolina Table 1 - Quantity o
Page 161 and 162:
Summary of North Dakota Waste Pesti
Page 163 and 164:
Summary of Ohio Waste Pesticide Dis
Page 165 and 166:
OKLAHOMA AT A GLANCEOklahoma does n
Page 167 and 168:
OREGON AT A GLANCESince 1991 Oregon
Page 169 and 170:
PENNSYLVANIA AT A GLANCEIn 1993 Pen
Page 171 and 172:
RHODE ISLAND AT A GLANCERhode Islan
Page 173 and 174:
SOUTH CAROLINA AT A GLANCESouth Car
Page 175 and 176:
SOUTH DAKOTA AT A GLANCESince 1993
Page 177 and 178:
TENNESSEE AT A GLANCEThe Tennessee
Page 179 and 180:
TEXAS AT A GLANCESince 1992 Texas h
Page 181 and 182:
YearNumberof SitesTexas Table 1 - Q
Page 183 and 184:
UTAH AT A GLANCESince 1993 Utah has
Page 185 and 186:
VERMONT AT A GLANCEVermont first co
Page 187 and 188:
VIRGINIA AT A GLANCEVirginia conduc
Page 189 and 190:
YearQuantity ofPesticides(pounds)Vi
Page 191 and 192:
Summary of Washington Waste Pestici
Page 193 and 194:
Summary of West Virginia Waste Pest
Page 195 and 196:
Summary of Wisconsin Waste Pesticid
Page 197 and 198:
WYOMING AT A GLANCEIn 1992 Wyoming
Page 199 and 200:
Appendix II - Pesticides That are R
Page 201 and 202:
Appendix IIU044 chloroform U080 met
Page 203 and 204:
Appendix IIIB. Availability Contrac
Page 205 and 206:
Appendix III4. Federal Hazardous Ma
Page 207 and 208:
Appendix III22. INDEPENDENT CONTRAC
Page 209 and 210:
Appendix IIIContractor further agre
Page 211 and 212:
Appendix III33. CONTRACTOR’S DUTI
Page 213 and 214:
Appendix IIIC. Any deviation of mor
Page 215 and 216:
Appendix III45. MERGER CLAUSEThis a
Page 217 and 218:
Appendix IVOnyx Environmental Servi
Page 219 and 220:
State Pre-89 1989 1990 1991 1992 19
Page 221 and 222:
State pre-89 1989 1990 1991 1992 19
Page 223 and 224:
Appendix VILouisiana: Division of P
Page 225 and 226:
Appendix VII - Sample Emergency Pla
Page 227 and 228:
Appendix VIIICOMPARISON OF PESTICID
Page 229:
StateEstimated(lbs. A.I.)Total Used
show all

Clean Sweep Programs - US Environmental Protection Agency

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?