Fremantle Port Inner Harbour and Channel ... - Fremantle Ports

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Appendix 1: Video analysis biological community classification schemeBiota classes Morphological groups Definitions <strong>and</strong> examplesOther biotaRecorded forMicrophytobenthos (MPB) Thin film layer (low, medium, high)presence/absence only Crustose coralline algae (CCA) Encrusting algaeTurfing algaeHair-like algae 20 mmSeagrassSeparated into genus or speciesMacroalgae Small algae Macroalgae 20 mm to 20 cmMembrane, thin sheets Padina spp., Lobophora spp.Foliaceous, bushyCaulerpa spp.Lobed, flattened <strong>and</strong> rounded Halimeda spp.Fleshy or ball-likeCodium spp.Canopy algaeMacroalgae >20 cmFlatEcklonia radiataBranchingCystophora spp., Sargassum spp., other fucoidsHard Coral Branching At least 20 branching (e.g. Seriatopora hystrix)DigitateLess than 20 branching (e.g. Acroporid digitifera)TabularHorizontal flattened plates (e.g. Acroporid hyacinthus)EncrustingMajor portion attached to substrate as a laminar plate (e.g. Poritid vaughani)FolioseCoral attached at one or more points, leaf-like appearance e.g. Turbinaria spp.)MassiveSolid boulder or mound (e.g. Favites spp.)SubmassiveTends to small columns, knobs or wedgesSoft Coral (BPP)Photosynthetic soft corals (BPP)Filter feedersAhermatypic animals (not defined as BPP)Soft Coral (non-BPP)Non-photosynthetic soft coralsSpongesCan note morphological groupsAscidiansStalked, encrusting, solitaryHydroidsSea whipsGorgonian fansSea pensBryozoanFoliose, stalkedAnemonesTube, solitaryPolychaetesPercent coverCover valueDecision rulesclasses>80% 90 no substrate visible60–80% 70 some substrate is visible40–60% 50 substrate is clearly visible but biota dominates the image frame20–40% 30 substrate dominates most of the image frame10–20% 15 substrate dominates most of the image frame5–10% 7.5 substrate dominates most of the image frame1–5% 3 trace densities0–1% 0.5 no significant macro-biota12 of 13
Appendix 2: Video analysis substrate classification schemeSubstrate typeDecision ruleReefSubstrate predominantly made up of particles of cobble size (>64 mm diameter) or largerSedimentSubstrate predominantly made up of particles of pebble size (256 mmRock (unbroken)Unbroken rock substrateReef profileHigh>4 m rise over 2 mMedium1–4 m rise over 2 mLow
Page 1:
Fremantle Port Inner Harbour and Ch
Page 5 and 6:
Client: Fremantle PortsDocument his
Page 7 and 8:
ContentsExecutive Summary .........
Page 9 and 10:
Executive SummaryProject StatusFrem
Page 11 and 12:
1. Introduction1.1 Background and p
Page 13 and 14:
Figure 1.1Dredge areas, reclaimed a
Page 15 and 16:
Table 2.2 Audit tableAuditCode801:M
Page 17 and 18:
AuditCodeSubject Action How Evidenc
Page 19 and 20:
3. Annual Survey Footprint of Offsh
Page 21 and 22:
Figure 3.2 Differences in bathymetr
Page 23:
A one in five year storm event (as
Page 26 and 27:
5. SummaryThere were zero non-compl
Page 29:
6. ReferencesDEC (2009) Guidelines
Page 33 and 34:
STATUS OF THIS DOCUMENTThis documen
Page 35 and 36:
Report shall be 15 months from the
Page 37 and 38:
6-3 If the Water Quality Monitoring
Page 39:
Table 2: Summary of key proposal ch
Page 47:
Fremantle Ports1 Cliff StreetFREMAN
Page 51:
Fremantle Ports - Gage RoadsOffshor
Page 55:
Client: Fremantle PortsRevisions hi
Page 58 and 59:
Figure 1.1Figure 1.2Figure 1.3Figur
Page 61 and 62: Executive SummaryOceanica Consultin
Page 63 and 64: 1. Introduction1.1 BackgroundThe Ga
Page 65 and 66: Figure 1.2Gage Roads habitat map in
Page 67 and 68: Figure 1.3Bathymetry for Gage Roads
Page 69 and 70: Figure 1.4 Benthic habitat within G
Page 71 and 72: 2. Methods2.1 Benthic habitat surve
Page 73 and 74: 2.2 Seagrass recovery2.2.1 Permanen
Page 75 and 76: Table 2.1Seagrass sites, zone desig
Page 77 and 78: Table 2.3Limits of Reporting (LOR)
Page 79 and 80: Sediment nutrients and metalsNutrie
Page 81 and 82: 3. Results3.1 Benthic habitat mapA
Page 83 and 84: Figure 3.2 Benthic habitat post dis
Page 85 and 86: 3.2 Seagrass recovery3.2.1 Seagrass
Page 87 and 88: Table 3.4PERMANOVA table of results
Page 89 and 90: Table 3.7Data ranges and detection
Page 91 and 92: The bathymetry data for December 20
Page 93 and 94: Bathymetry data from December 2011
Page 95 and 96: 4. DiscussionWithin the Offshore Di
Page 97 and 98: 6. AcknowledgementsThis report was
Page 99: Appendix AGeo Oceans Report
Page 102 and 103: Benthic Habitat AssessmentTowed Vid
Page 104 and 105: 1. IntroductionGeo Oceans was commi
Page 106 and 107: Table 2 Tide predictions for the Po
Page 108 and 109: Figure 1 Substrate and biota habita
Page 110 and 111: Figure 2 Depth data collected durin
Page 115: Appendix BGeoImage Report
Page 118 and 119: Table of ContentsIntroduction......
Page 120 and 121: Figure 1: Study site overview for s
Page 122 and 123: Project 1Project 1 aimed to generat
Page 124 and 125: Figure 2: Tier 1 classification res
Page 126 and 127: Limitations and assumptionsA number
Page 129: Appendix CSeagrass Monitoring Site
Page 147: Appendix ESeagrass Shoot Count Data
Page 155: Appendix GSediment Field Log
Page 169:
Appendix INutrient and Metals Data
Page 172 and 173:
MarineandFreshwaterResearchLaborato
Page 174 and 175:
Page 176 and 177:
Page 178 and 179:
Page 180:
show all

Fremantle Port Inner Harbour and Channel ... - Fremantle Ports

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?