- Page 1: Fremantle Port Inner Harbour and Ch
- Page 5 and 6: Client: Fremantle PortsDocument his
- Page 7 and 8: ContentsExecutive Summary .........
- Page 9 and 10: Executive SummaryProject StatusFrem
- Page 11 and 12: 1. Introduction1.1 Background and p
- Page 13 and 14: Figure 1.1Dredge areas, reclaimed a
- Page 15 and 16: Table 2.2 Audit tableAuditCode801:M
- Page 17 and 18: AuditCodeSubject Action How Evidenc
- Page 19 and 20: 3. Annual Survey Footprint of Offsh
- Page 21 and 22: Figure 3.2 Differences in bathymetr
- Page 23: A one in five year storm event (as
- Page 26 and 27: 5. SummaryThere were zero non-compl
- Page 29: 6. ReferencesDEC (2009) Guidelines
- Page 34 and 35: 2 Proponent Nomination and Contact
- Page 36 and 37: management unit referred to in cond
- Page 38 and 39: Schedule 1Table 1: BPPH assessmentT
- Page 45: Appendix BSurface to surface volume
- Page 49: Appendix CSupplementary Benthic Pri
- Page 53: \\oce-per-fs1\projects\FremantlePor
- Page 57 and 58: ContentsAcronyms ..................
- Page 59: AcronymsASdfEDMGISGPShaICP-AESIHDIS
- Page 62 and 63: Bathymetric surveys of the Gage Roa
- Page 64 and 65: Figure 1.1Gage Roads Offshore Dispo
- Page 66 and 67: 1.3 Objectives - Phase I surveyThe
- Page 68 and 69: 1.4.1 Inner Harbour and Channel Dee
- Page 70 and 71: Seagrass shoot countsPrior to dispo
- Page 72 and 73: Figure 2.1Towed video ground truthi
- Page 74 and 75: Figure 2.2Permanent seagrass and se
- Page 76 and 77: frames must be >25 frames apart. Th
- Page 78 and 79: 2.3.3 Sediment redistributionRates
- Page 80 and 81:
2.5.2 Laboratory analyses and proce
- Page 82 and 83:
Figure 3.1Gage Roads Offshore Dispo
- Page 84 and 85:
Figure 3.3Changes in benthic habita
- Page 86 and 87:
Table 3.2PERMANOVA table of results
- Page 88 and 89:
1009080%ofsizedistribution706050403
- Page 90 and 91:
Figure 3.7Differences in bathymetry
- Page 92 and 93:
Changes in bathymetry from December
- Page 94 and 95:
Due to the limited spatial area cov
- Page 96 and 97:
5. Future Surveys (Phases II and II
- Page 98 and 99:
7. ReferencesAnderson M.J., Gorley
- Page 101 and 102:
BENTHIC HABITAT ASSESSMENTTowed Vid
- Page 103 and 104:
CONTENTS1. Introduction............
- Page 105 and 106:
longitude coordinates from a Furuno
- Page 107 and 108:
Table 3 Data fields captured in the
- Page 109 and 110:
3. ResultsA total of 27180 rows of
- Page 111 and 112:
Figure 3 Seagrass percent cover dat
- Page 113:
Appendix 2: Video analysis substrat
- Page 117 and 118:
Geoimage Final ReportWA12-0343Subst
- Page 119 and 120:
IntroductionThe purpose of this pro
- Page 121 and 122:
MethodsInputsThe choice of suitable
- Page 123 and 124:
Table 3: Tier 2 marine substrate ma
- Page 125 and 126:
Figure 3: Tier 2 classification res
- Page 127:
Conclusions and RecommendationsThe
- Page 139:
Appendix DChain of Custody Forms
- Page 151:
Appendix FPercentage Cover
- Page 163:
Appendix HParticle Size Distributio
- Page 171 and 172:
MarineandFreshwaterResearchLaborato
- Page 173 and 174:
MarineandFreshwaterResearchLaborato
- Page 175 and 176:
MarineandFreshwaterResearchLaborato
- Page 177 and 178:
MarineandFreshwaterResearchLaborato
- Page 179 and 180:
MarineandFreshwaterResearchLaborato
- Page 183:
Appendix JPore-water Nutrients, Who