10.07.2015 Views

Report - Guardian

Report - Guardian

Report - Guardian

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS
  • No tags were found...

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The LSE Identity Project <strong>Report</strong>: June 2005 229applications is covered by existing and additional staff costs. Some costs would beincurred at any regional location where biometric information was recorded, both inapplications and in the use of recording equipment. 568 The 2002 consultation documentestimated that the cost of 67.6 million people entering into the entitlement card schemeis £406 million. 569 Certain factors may vary this amount, notably that some applicationswill be more costly to process, for example, foreign residents or the housebound,, theremay be insufficient demand from other organisations to participate and, conversely, ahigher than expected willingness from other organisations to participate. 570 Taking theseinto consideration, the estimated cost is increased by 50% to £608 million. 571The Biographical FootprintEstablishing the ‘biographical footprint’ is an extensive process involving theaccumulation of information on all participants. Examples given of informationincluded in the biographical identity category are education/qualifications, electoralregister entries, details of benefits claimed/taxes paid, employment history, marriagecertificates issued, mortgage account information/property ownership, insurancepolicies and history of interaction with organisations such as banks, creditors, publicauthorities and utilities. 572The Government foresees regularised and routine methods of access to this type ofinformation. 573 In the earlier documentation, the national identity system would allowfor cross checking between the DVLA and the UK passport service, and use of theNational Insurance record and electoral register for confirming personal details. Creditreference agencies could be used to verify current and previous addresses. Individualswould no longer need to send birth/marriage certificates for official purposes because ofthe facility to cross reference. 574 A scheme of this kind would therefore require theestablishment of information sharing gateways between relevant Government agenciesand the private sector, in particular with credit reference agencies. 575The links to other databases to access information about applicants is part of a projectthat the UKPS are calling the ‘Personal Identification Process’ (PIP). This project wasmentioned briefly in both Corporate and Business Plans 2003 - 2008 576 and 2004 –2009. 577 Both plans indicate that the ‘process’ is still in the preliminary stages, but theperceived benefit is expected to be one of strengthened identity authorisation. 578 TheUKPS anticipate that a change in legislation will be required to incorporate fully thisinformation-sharing scheme. 579568 Consultation Document, Section 5, 2002, paragraph 24.569 Consultation Document, Section 5, 2002, paragraph 25.570 Consultation Document, Section 5, 2002, paragraph 26.571 Consultation Document, Section 5, 2002, paragraph 27.572 Consultation Document, Section 4, 2002, paragraph 20.573 Consultation Document, Section 4, 2002, paragraph 21.574 Consultation Document, Section 4, 2002, paragraph 21.575 Consultation Document, Section 4, 2002, paragraph 22.576 ‘Confirming nationality and Identity and Enabling Travel’, page 20577 UKPS Corporate and Business Plans 2004 –2009, page 21578 UKPS Corporate and Business Plans 2004 –2009, page 21579 UKPS Corporate and Business Plans 2004 –2009, page 21

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!