Chorda tympani (CT) anesthesia leads to elevatedglossopharyngeal (IX) sensation; among supertasters of 6-npropylthiouracil,it also enhances trigeminal (V) sensation. Thesefindings imply that oral disinhibition occurs in proportion togenetic taste status, and that affected sensations are differentiallysusceptible to these effects. Supporting this idea, in healthysubjects with low taste function, unilateral anesthesia of either thelingual nerve (i.e., CT and V; N = 46) or the chorda tympani (N =28) asymmetrically compromises posterior taste sensation, withthe side contralateral to anesthesia showing the least suppression.Lingual nerve block produced posterior asymmetry <strong>for</strong> all fourcommon taste modalities, but direct CT block did so only <strong>for</strong>salty stimuli. Previous reports suggest that loss of 2+ oral sensoryinputs broadly compromises taste function; these reports alsoshow posterior taste enhancement with CT block, but modalityspecificasymmetry may represent mild disinhibition inindividuals with low native taste function. Finally, contralateralanterior oral burn remained intact with both nerve blocks, whileposterior oral burn was blunted bilaterally; these data imply thatdisinhibitory trigeminal enhancement is associated with hightaster status. In sum, disinhibitory effects of localized oral sensoryloss vary based on genetic taste status; posterior taste elevationmanifests in nontasters as asymmetric loss, while trigeminaleffects occur mainly in supertasters.#8 Withdrawn#9 Gustation“Restrained Eaters” Show Abnormal and DifferentialfMRI Activation to Sucrose and SaccharinClaire Murphy 1,2 , Nobuko Kemmotsu 1,21San Diego State University San Diego, CA, USA,2University of Cali<strong>for</strong>nia, San Diego San Diego, CA, USAObesity in the US has reached epidemic proportions, affectingpresent and future health status of millions of Americans. Personswho exercise cognitive restraint over eating behavior may provideinsights into underlying mechanisms of obesity. “Restrainedeaters” attempt to control weight by cognitive restraint, activelyregulating the quantity and quality of food intake. Whether theyhave altered brain activity to nutritive and non -nutritive tastestimuli is unknown. The present study investigated tastein<strong>for</strong>mation processing in the central nervous system using thefunctional MRI technique. Sixteen participants were “restrainedeaters” defined by Factor 1 (cognitive restraint) items of the ThreeFactor Eating Questionnaire (TFEQ; Stunkard & Messick, 1985),and 16 were “non-restrained eaters.” The BOLD signal changewas investigated when the participants were hungry and satiatedwith a nutritional preload, in response to sucrose and saccharin.Non-restrained eaters responded with more robust activation tothe caloric sweetener. In contrast, the restrained eaters showed adifferent activation pattern, demonstrating greater response tosaccharin than to sucrose. Interestingly, restrained eaters showeddecreased activation in OFC and amygdala in response to thesaccharin when satiated, the same pattern observed in thenon-restrained eaters in response to sucrose. This differentialactivation to sucrose and saccharin, particularly in reward areas ofthe brain, suggests altered brain mechanisms in restrained eaters.A better understanding of the development and maintenance ofthis phenomenon may lead to strategies <strong>for</strong> prevention of andinterventions <strong>for</strong> obesity.#10 Gender effects on olfactory processingAxons of gustatory receptor 32a expressing neurons extendtheir terminal throughout adult lifetimeTetsuya Miyamoto, Hubert AmreinDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology,Duke University Medical CenterCourtship is an essential behavior <strong>for</strong> successful mating. In maleDrosophila, chemosensory cues are thought to control manyaspects of courtship such as identification of partners of the samespecies, appropriate sex and suitable mating status. Recently,we report that the gustatory receptor (Gr) gene, Gr32a, plays animportant role in male courtship. Gr32a mutant males shownormal courtship towards females. However, the courtship indexof Gr32a mutant males towards males and mated females, whichcontain male pheromones, is much higher than that of wild typemales. These results indicate that Gr32a is essential <strong>for</strong> detectionof a male inhibitory pheromone, which is necessary <strong>for</strong>suppression of courtship towards unrewarding potential mates.Gr32a is expressed in chemosensory neurons of labial palp andlegs, but leg neurons are sufficient to repress male-male courtship.All gustatory neurons are thought to project to the primary tasteprocessingcenter, subesophageal ganglion. However, weoccasionally observed that Gr32a leg neurons directly project tothe ventro-lateral protocerebrum, which is known as a higherorder brain structure as receiving input from multiple sensorymodalities, including visual, auditory, and possibly olfactorycues. The morphology of Gr32a neurons outside of thesubesophageal ganglion shows a huge diversity among individualand even in either side of the same brain. Their axon ends atvarious positions, from the subesophageal ganglion to upper endof the ventro-lateral protocerebrum. The number of axon terminalis also widely ranged, from 1 to 20. Strikingly, there is a clearcorrelation among the probability of axon to reach the ventrolateralprotocerebrum, the complexity of axon terminal and age upto 60 days after eclosion. This is also observed in flies kept inisolation, though less significant than that of flies kept in a group.Our studies suggest Gr32a leg neurons slowly extend theirterminals throughout adult lifetime; this phenomenon might leadolder, socially experienced flies tend to avoid males and matedfemales more strictly.#11 Gender effects on olfactory processingRecognition of Sexual Cues in the Urine byMouse Vomeronasal OrganRon Yu 1,2 , Jie He 1 , Limei Ma 1 , Sangseong Kim 1 , Junichi Nakai 31Stowers Institute Kansas City, MO, USA, 2 University of KansasMedical Center Kansas City, KS, USA, 3 RIKEN Brain InstituteWako-shi, JapanThe vomeronasal organs of the mammalian species detect complexchemical signals in the urine that convey in<strong>for</strong>mation about sex,strain, as well as the social and reproductive status of anindividual. How such complex signals are recognized by thevomeronasal organ is not well understood. In this study, we havedeveloped transgenic mice expressing the calcium indicator,G-CaMP2, to analyze the population response of vomeronasalneurons to urine from individual animals. We found that asubstantial portion of the cells were activated by either male urineor female urine, but most of them contributed little to sexdiscrimination. Sex in<strong>for</strong>mation was represented by a surprisingly<strong>Abstracts</strong> | 9
small population of cells responding exclusively to sex-specificcues shared across strains and individuals. Female-specific cuesactivated more cells and were subject to more complex hormonalregulations than male-specific cues. In contrast to sex, strain andindividual in<strong>for</strong>mation contained in urine was encoded by thecombinatorial activation of neurons such that urine samples fromdifferent individuals elicited distinctive patterns of activation.Interestingly, mouse urine at different concentrations activatesdistinct subsets of VNO neurons. Direct investigation of theurogenital area allows pheromones to reach the VNO at a levelthat provides unambiguous identification of the sex and the strainof animals. Lower concentration urine activates a different set ofcells, some of which are masked by high concentration urine.These observations suggest that the vomeronasal circuitry is likelyto per<strong>for</strong>m complex computation of pheromone in<strong>for</strong>mation in acontext-dependent manner to trigger innate behaviors andendocrine changes.#12 Gender effects on olfactory processingVomeronasal reception of a sex peptide pheromoneESP1 in mice: the receptor, neural circuitry, and behaviorKazushige TouharaDepartment of Integrated Biosciences, The University of TokyoChiba, JapanWe have previously discovered a male-specific putativepheromone, exocrine gland-secreting peptide 1 (ESP1), that isreleased into tear fluids from the extraorbital lacrimal gland andactivates vomeronasal sensory neurons in female mice. Here weshow the identification of a specific vomeronasal receptor V2Rp5<strong>for</strong> ESP1 and the involvement of TRPC2 in its downstream signaltransduction mechanism. The neural pathway beginning with aspecific recognition of ESP1 by V2Rp5 was visualized, showingthe transmission of the ESP1 signal to the spatially highlyorganizedpopulation of secondary neurons in the accessoryolfactory bulb. ESP1 induced a sexually dimorphic activationpattern at higher-order brain regions. We observed theinvolvement of ESP1 in a sexual behavior of female mice.Together, we demonstrate that the “labeled-line” pathwayfrom a specific receptor to the brain in a sex-specific manneris a molecular and neural basis <strong>for</strong> the vomeronasal system thatdecodes and represents in<strong>for</strong>mation of a sex peptide pheromone.The present study provides molecular and functional linkbetween a sex peptide pheromone and a selective neuralcircuitry leading to a behavioral output via a specific receptorin the mouse vomeronasal system.10 | AChemS <strong>Abstracts</strong> <strong>2009</strong>#13 Gender effects on olfactory processingDifferential Sensory Neuron Activation Underlies GenderDimorphic Aggressive BehaviorLisa Stowers 1 , Pablo Chamero 2 , Kelly Flanagan 1 , Fabio Papes 3 ,Darren DW Logan 1 , Toby F Marton 4 , Angeldeep Kaur 11The Scripps Research Institute La Jolla, CA, USA, 2 Universityof Saarland Homberg, Germany, 3 State University of CampinasCampinas, Brazil, 4 University of Cali<strong>for</strong>nia San Diego San Diego,CA, USAFemales do not respond aggressively to the same pheromones thatprovoke aggression in males. The underlying neural code thatresults in this gender dimorphic behavior is unknown. Moleculardifferences in the sensory neurons between male and female micehave not been reported. Recent findings in Drosophila haveshown that each gender detects the ligands similarly and knowndifferences in the organization of the responsive neural circuitsmay lead to their differing innate behaviors (Datta et al., 2008).We now show that while neurons in the male vomeronasal organare activated in response to MUPs, female sensory neurons aredramatically impaired to all but one identified MUP suggestinga sensory perception difference between males and females.Interestingly, females do not robustly detect the individual MUPthat promotes aggression in males. The dimorphic sensoryresponse is not genetic but rather a response to female hormonesas juveniles of both sexes and castrated males detect all Mupssimilarly to intact males with the response extinguishing asfemales become sexually mature. This response is plastic andrapid; manipulating hormone levels in females leads to acorresponding change in the ability of vomeronasal neurons todetect and respond to Mups. The lack of response to theaggression MUP pheromone by females singularly provides anovel mechanism <strong>for</strong> this innate gender dimorphism.#14 Gender effects on olfactory processingOpposite-sex volatile urinary odors detected by the mainand processed via the accessory olfactory system contributeto mate recognition in miceMichael J. Baum 1 , Ningdong Kang 1 , Kristine M. Martel 1 ,James A. Cherry 21Dept. of Biology, Boston University Boston, MA, USA,2Dept. of Psychology, Boston University Boston, MA, USAWe assessed the contribution of main and accessory olfactorysignaling to the preference of mice to investigate opposite- versussame-sex urinary odors. Urinary volatiles from the 2 sexesstimulated distinct profiles of glomerular activation in the ventralmain olfactory bulb (MOB) of both male and female mice.By contrast, only opposite-sex urinary volatiles stimulatedFos expression in the accessory olfactory bulb (AOB) after theirdetection by the main olfactory epithelium (MOE) as opposed tothe vomeronasal organ. Tract tracing experiments in female miceshowed that urinary odors from opposite-, but not same-sex,conspecifics stimulated Fos expression in MOB mitral/tuftedcells that project directly to the ‘vomeronasal’ (medial) amygdala.Opposite-sex urinary volatiles also selectively stimulated Fosexpression in medial amygdalar neurons that send centrifugalprojections to the AOB of females. Bilateral AOB lesions in eithermale or female mice attenuated subjects’ motivation to investigateopposite-sex urinary volatiles. Opposite-sex urinary volatilesthat are initially detected by the main olfactory system gainpreferential access to the vomeronasal amygdala and theAOB with a resulting facilitation of mate recognition andreproductive success. Supported by NIH grant HD 044897.
- Page 3 and 4: AChemSAssociation for Chemoreceptio
- Page 5 and 6: AChemSAssociation for Chemoreceptio
- Page 7 and 8: AChemSAssociation for Chemoreceptio
- Page 9: #4 GustationGPR40 knockout mice hav
- Page 13: higher order areas. The beta oscill
- Page 17 and 18: conclusions limited, however, by th
- Page 19 and 20: expressed in the taste cells may al
- Page 21: glomerulus varies across individual
- Page 24 and 25: TH/GFP expression levels in depolar
- Page 26 and 27: not activation and sensitivity. Fur
- Page 28 and 29: POSTER PRESENTATIONS#P1 Poster sess
- Page 30 and 31: and gender (all male). Our results
- Page 32 and 33: activation in psychiatric disorders
- Page 34 and 35: the e4 allele. The ApoE e4 allele i
- Page 36 and 37: including the olfactory epithelium,
- Page 38 and 39: and posterior (MeP), which are diff
- Page 40 and 41: 75 and 39 of 80 PbN cells were acti
- Page 42 and 43: on the left side and from 60.9 ± 1
- Page 44 and 45: #P52 Poster session II: Chemosensor
- Page 46 and 47: #P58 Poster session II: Chemosensor
- Page 48 and 49: #P64 Poster session II: Chemosensor
- Page 50 and 51: #P70 Poster session II: Chemosensor
- Page 52 and 53: esponses (net spikes) evoked by app
- Page 54 and 55: These findings demonstrate the capa
- Page 56 and 57: ecorded units tracked stimuli up to
- Page 58 and 59: elationship in the characteristic r
- Page 60 and 61:
#P103 Poster session II: Chemosenso
- Page 62 and 63:
#P108 Poster session III: Cortical
- Page 64 and 65:
#P115 Poster session III: Cortical
- Page 66 and 67:
luciferase-based reporter gene assa
- Page 68 and 69:
#P128 Poster session III: Cortical
- Page 70 and 71:
#P134 Poster session III: Cortical
- Page 72 and 73:
1987). MP’s olfactory discriminat
- Page 74 and 75:
#P147 Poster session III: Cortical
- Page 76 and 77:
discriminate between the H 2 S/IAA
- Page 78 and 79:
#P160 Poster session IV: Chemosenso
- Page 80 and 81:
subject to native regulatory mechan
- Page 82 and 83:
#P173 Poster session IV: Chemosenso
- Page 84 and 85:
G protein-coupled receptors for bit
- Page 86 and 87:
#P186 Poster session IV: Chemosenso
- Page 88 and 89:
#P192 Poster session IV: Chemosenso
- Page 90 and 91:
#P198 Poster session IV: Chemosenso
- Page 92 and 93:
eta, ENAC gamma), b-actin, PLC-b 2
- Page 94 and 95:
presented in a recognition memory p
- Page 96 and 97:
#P217 Poster session V: Chemosensor
- Page 98 and 99:
educed granule cell spiking. These
- Page 100 and 101:
#P230 Poster session V: Chemosensor
- Page 102 and 103:
data here from mouse studies using
- Page 104 and 105:
in taste bud induction and developm
- Page 106 and 107:
trends in expression of GAP-43, OMP
- Page 108 and 109:
elationship between concentration a
- Page 110 and 111:
four (4 AFC) that they believe is m
- Page 112 and 113:
#P268 Poster session VI: Chemosenso
- Page 114 and 115:
pleasantness (r=.275 p=.006), where
- Page 116 and 117:
utyl, hexyl, and octyl benzene). We
- Page 118 and 119:
taller compared to wild-type mice.
- Page 120 and 121:
animals over the age of P24 were gi
- Page 122 and 123:
classify subjects as PROP non-taste
- Page 124 and 125:
al 2008. Increases in glucose sensi
- Page 126 and 127:
#P315 Poster session VII: Chemosens
- Page 128 and 129:
differences in taste receptors is n
- Page 130 and 131:
IndexAbaffy, T - 48Abakah, R - P299
- Page 132 and 133:
Illig, K - 19, P109Imoto, T - P136I
- Page 134 and 135:
Rucker, J - P305Rudenga, K - P315Ru
- Page 136 and 137:
AChemS Abstracts 2009 | 135
- Page 138 and 139:
Registration7:30 am to 1:00 pm, 6:3
- Page 140 and 141:
Notes______________________________
- Page 142 and 143:
See you next yearat ournew venue!Tr