G protein-coupled receptors <strong>for</strong> bitter, sweet and umamicompounds, and are the source of ATP secretion. These cells arebelieved to secrete ATP through gap junction hemichannels.Based on studies from isolated taste cells, we have postulated thatATP secreted from Receptor cells acts within the taste bud toexcite adjacent Presynaptic (Type III) cells (Huang et al2007). This however, remains to be established in more intactpreparations. Here we use lingual slices containing intact tastebuds to test the hypothesis in detail. We used confocal Ca 2+imaging to track taste stimulation of Receptor and Presynaptictaste cells. Incubating the tissue with an ecto-ATPase (apyrase,30 units/ml) reversibly blocked signal transfer from Receptorto Presynaptic cells, consistent with ATP being thetransmitter. Inhibiting pannexin 1 (Px1) gap junctionhemichannels with CO 2 -saturated buffer reduced cell-cellsignaling (N.B., intracellular acidification with CO 2 -buffer is apotent blocker of Px1 channels). Moreover, probenecid (1 mM),an antagonist of Px1 channels (Silverman et al 2008; Ma et al 2008)significantly reduced cell-cell signaling between Receptor andPresynaptic cells. These findings strongly support the hypothesisthat in situ, gustatory Receptor cells secrete ATP via Px1hemichannels when taste buds are stimulated and that thereleased ATP excites adjacent Presynaptic cells. These findingsare being used to develop a model <strong>for</strong> signal processing inmammalian taste buds.#P180 Poster session IV: Chemosensory transductionand perireceptor eventsTaste cells express and secrete glucagon-like peptide 1Zaza Kokrashvili, Robert F. MargolskeeMount Sinai School of Medicine New York, NY, USA#P181 Poster session IV: Chemosensory transductionand perireceptor eventsSodium/calcium exchangers selectively contribute to theregulation of cytosolic calcium levels in mouse taste cellsAgnieszka I. Laskowski, Kathryn F. MedlerUniversity at Buffalo Buffalo, NY, USAThe detection of gustatory stimuli depends on the activation ofdiverse signaling pathways that are selectively expressed in tastereceptor cells in the oral cavity. Some taste stimuli activateG-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) that cause calcium releasefrom intracellular stores while other stimuli depolarize taste cellsto cause calcium influx through voltage-gated calcium channels(VGCCs). We have recently shown that activation of these twotypes of signaling pathways generate significantly differentcalcium responses within taste cells (Hacker et al., 2008) and wepredicted that the mechanisms needed to regulate these differentcalcium loads may also differ. To date, however, the calciumbuffering mechanisms in taste cells have not been well studied.We recently demonstrated that mitochondria make significantcontributions to the regulation of cytosolic calcium in taste cells(Hacker & Medler, 2008) but no other calcium bufferingmechanisms in taste cells have been identified. In this study, weused calcium imaging to characterize the role of sodium/calciumexchangers (NCXs) in regulating cytosolic calcium in tastecells. We found that NCXs make important contributions to themaintenance of resting calcium levels in taste cells and that theseproteins selectively contribute to the regulation of evoked calciumresponses. RT-PCR analysis revealed that multiple NCX andsodium/calcium/potassium exchangers (NCKX) are expressed intaste cells.P O S T E R SWe previously observed that gustducin, T1r receptors and severalother taste signaling elements are expressed in duodenalenteroendocrine L cells that express glucagon-like peptide 1(GLP-1). We determined that gustducin and T1r3 are critical toenteroendocrine L cell release of GLP-1 in response to glucose.A number of years ago we speculated that if the gut’s L cellsexpressed taste elements then taste cells might in turn expressGLP-1 and other L cell hormones. We have found that this isindeed the case and have examined the function of hormonesreleased from these “endocrine taste cells.” METHODS: RT-PCR, in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry were usedto examine expression of GLP-1 and other gut hormones in tastecells. ELISA was used to monitor in vivo release of GLP-1 fromtaste cells into the bloodstream in response to glucose and othertastants. Esophagealectomy/vagotomy was done to eliminatedirect or indirect stimulation of enteroendocrine L cells in gut.Circumvallate papillae explants in culture were examined <strong>for</strong> theability to release GLP-1 after tastant stimulation. RESULTS:Taste cells were found to express GLP-1, glucagon, PYY andother gut hormones. Patterns of expression indicated thatgustducin-expressing type II cells and other subtypes of taste cellsexpress GLP-1. In wild-type mice, with or without vagotomy,application of glucose to the tongue induced a rapid elevation ofGLP-1 in the bloodstream. Stimulation of taste cell explants withglucose led to release of GLP-1 into the medium. Glucosestimulation of gustducin-null mice did not lead to significantrelease of GLP-1 from taste cells in vivo or in explants.CONCLUSIONS: The cephalic phase rise in circulatingGLP-1 depends on direct release of GLP-1 from gustducinexpressingtaste cells into the bloodstream.#P182 Poster session IV: Chemosensory transductionand perireceptor eventsThe multiple PDZ domain protein 1 (MUPP1) – Role in theolfactory signal transduction cascadeSabrina Baumgart, Ruth C. Dooley, Hanns Hatt, Eva M.NeuhausRuhr-University Bochum Bochum, GermanyThe complex network of the olfactory signal transductionpathway, found in olfactory sensory neurons (OSNs), enablesmammals to detect and discriminate between thousands ofdifferent odorants. Until now, the importance of organizing thevarious interaction partners of olfactory receptors (ORs) is notwell understood. For diverse cell signalling cascades interactionswith PDZ domain containing proteins, which assemble definedprotein networks and thereby regulate signalling events, arecharacterized. The Multiple PDZ Domain Protein 1, MUPP1,consists of 13 individual PDZ domains and interacts withdifferent GPCRs such as the serotonin receptor 5-HT 2c and theGABA B receptor. We demonstrate that this scaffolding protein ishighly expressed in the dendritic knobs and cilia of olfactorysensory neurons. We further found that ORs and MUPP1 interactin vitro and in the recombinant expression system. There<strong>for</strong>eMUPP1 represents a possible nucleator or regulator of theolfactory response by acting as first building block of a putative“olfactosome”. The physiological role of MUPP1 inchemosensory systems and the identification of unknowninteraction partners are currently investigated.<strong>Abstracts</strong> | 83
#P183 Poster session IV: Chemosensory transductionand perireceptor eventsGurmarin inhibits the Sweet Receptor by Binding to theVenus Fly Trap Module of T1R3Emeline L. Maillet, Laura Pelletier, Timothy J. Cardozo,Jeniffer Quijada, Prisca Silie, Baohua Zhao, Yuzo Ninomiya,Marianna Max, Robert F. MargolskeeMount Sinai School of Medicine, Department of Neuroscience.Box1065 New York, NY, USAGurmarin is a polypeptide of 35 amino-acids that suppressesbehavioral and gustatory neural responses of rodents to sweetcompounds without affecting responses to salty, sour, or bittersubstances. Gurmarin has no detectable effect in humanpsychophysical studies. Here, we show that gurmarin acts onmouse T1R3 to antagonize the heterologously expressed mousesweet receptor’s response to a panel of sweeteners. Co-expressingthe non-taster allele of mT1R3 with human T1R2 yields afunctional sweet receptor that is sensitive to gurmarin, indicatingthat these allelic variations in mT1R3 does not affect gurmarinbinding. Studies with human-mouse chimeras of T1R3 indicatedthat the first 150 amino acids (aa) of T1R3 must be from mouse tomaintain sensitivity to gurmarin. Additional chimeras narrowedthe region of importance to aa 40-80 of mT1R3. Based on thecrystal structure of mGluR1, we created a homology model of theVenus Fly Trap Module of mT1R3. According to this model a41-66 aa loop (loop1) is present within the upper lobe1 of thereceptor’s cleft. In our model, gurmarin docks to the receptorwithin the open cleft of the VFTM, directly in contact with theupper lobe. The difference in the 3D shape of the correspondingloop1 of human T1R3 suggests that steric hindrance preventsgurmarin from binding to human T1R3’s VFTM cleft. Wehypothesize that gurmarin may inhibit activation of the sweetreceptor by preventing proper adoption of T1R3 VFTM closestate. In addition, analysis of the interactions in the docked modelbetween gurmarin and the receptor accord with previous workidentifying key aromatic residues necessary <strong>for</strong> gurmarinfunction. Finally, point mutants altered at residues of mouseT1R3 predicted to interact with gurmarin displayed reducedsensitivity to gurmarin in in-vitro assays.#P184 Poster session IV: Chemosensory transductionand perireceptor eventsEffect of inosine monophosphate (IMP) on taste perceptionof methionine and valine by miceYuko Murata 1 , Alexander A. Bachmanov 2 , Gary K. Beauchamp 21National Research Institute of Fisheries Science Yokohama, Japan,2Monell Chemical Senses Center Philadelphia, PA, USAIn vitro heterologous expression studies showed that most L-amino acids, including L-methionine (Met) and L-Valine (Val),activate the mouse T1R1+T1R3 receptor when they are mixedwith IMP. However, Met and Val differ in their ability to activatethe mouse T1R1+T1R3 receptor without IMP. While Metstrongly activates this receptor, Val evokes only negligibleactivation (Nelson et. al., 2002). The goal of our study was toexamine whether addition of IMP changes taste quality perceptionof Met and Val. We have addressed this question using aconditioned taste aversion (CTA) technique. Separate groups ofC57BL/6J mice were exposed to one of four conditioned stimuli(50 mM Met, 50 mM Met + 2.5 mM IMP, 50 mM Val or 50 mMVal + 2.5 mM IMP) or to water (control) and injected with LiClto <strong>for</strong>m CTA. Conditioned mice were presented with five basictaste solutions, Met and Val, and their lick responses wererecorded. An aversion to Met generalized to quinine, while anaversion to Met+IMP generalized to Met, 150 mM sucrose, amixture of 50 mM MSG and 30 M amiloride (Ami; added toblock sodium taste) with or without 2.5 mM IMP (i.e.,MSG+IMP+Ami and MSG+Ami), but not quinine. An aversionto Val generalized to quinine, while an aversion to Val+IMPgeneralized to MSG+IMP+Ami and MSG+Ami, but not quinine.This suggests that addition of IMP changes the taste quality ofMet and Val in vivo, which is consistent with results of in vitroexperiments. Supported by Fisheries Research Agency(Yokohama, Japan) research grant (YM) and NIH grant DC00882 (GKB and AAB).#P185 Poster session IV: Chemosensory transductionand perireceptor eventsMitigation of irradiation effects on taste epithelium in theProtein Kinase C delta null mouseH.M. Nguyen 1 , M.E. Reyland 2 , L.A. Barlow 11Dept. of Cell & Developmental Biology, and The RockyMountain Taste and Smell Center, School of Medicine, Universityof Colorado Denver Aurora, CO, USA, 2 Dept. of CraniofacialBiology, School of Dental Medicine, University of ColoradoDenver Aurora, CO, USARadiotherapy <strong>for</strong> head and neck cancer can result in taste loss;yet how radiation influences taste is unknown. One idea is thatdisruption of taste cell renewal may be causal. Taste cell turnoverspans 10-14 days (Beidler and Smallman, 1965) driven byproduction of transit amplifying (TA) cells in or near taste budsfrom as-of-yet unidentified stem cells. We propose that taste lossafter irradiation is due to apoptosis of replenishing TA cells, andconsequent attrition of mature taste cells. In support of this, wefind that proliferating TA cells are absent at 3 days postirradiation (dpi) including cells in S (BrdU-IR) and M (phosphohistone3(pH3)-IR) phases, in fungi<strong>for</strong>m (ffp) and circumvallate(cvp) papillae. Thus, one strategy <strong>for</strong> averting taste loss may be toreduce epithelial cell death, with the prediction that cell divisionwould not be interrupted. Protein kinase C delta (PKCd) is amultifunctional kinase, which positively regulates apoptosis.To test if radiation effects on taste epithelium are mitigated inPKCd-/- mice, the heads of wild type (WT) and PKCd-/- adultswere irradiated with a single 8Gy dose and lingual epitheliaexamined <strong>for</strong> BrdU- and pH3-IR at progressive dpi. As in ourinitial results, in ffp and cvp, BrdU-IR cells are absent at 3 dpi,increase at 5 dpi, then decrease after 9 dpi. Cells in M phase(pH3-IR) are missing at 3 and 5 dpi, reappear by 7 dpi, thendecrease after 9 dpi. By contrast, the proliferative profile ofirradiated PKCd-/- mice does not drop; BrdU- and pH3-IR cellsare present at 3 and 5 dpi and dividing cell number is dramaticallyhigher from 7-11 dpi compared with WT mice. Our data suggestthat PKCd is required <strong>for</strong> apoptotic cell death and/or repressesproliferation in irradiated taste epithelium.84 | AChemS <strong>Abstracts</strong> <strong>2009</strong>
- Page 3 and 4:
AChemSAssociation for Chemoreceptio
- Page 5 and 6:
AChemSAssociation for Chemoreceptio
- Page 7 and 8:
AChemSAssociation for Chemoreceptio
- Page 9 and 10:
#4 GustationGPR40 knockout mice hav
- Page 11 and 12:
small population of cells respondin
- Page 13:
higher order areas. The beta oscill
- Page 17 and 18:
conclusions limited, however, by th
- Page 19 and 20:
expressed in the taste cells may al
- Page 21:
glomerulus varies across individual
- Page 24 and 25:
TH/GFP expression levels in depolar
- Page 26 and 27:
not activation and sensitivity. Fur
- Page 28 and 29:
POSTER PRESENTATIONS#P1 Poster sess
- Page 30 and 31:
and gender (all male). Our results
- Page 32 and 33:
activation in psychiatric disorders
- Page 34 and 35: the e4 allele. The ApoE e4 allele i
- Page 36 and 37: including the olfactory epithelium,
- Page 38 and 39: and posterior (MeP), which are diff
- Page 40 and 41: 75 and 39 of 80 PbN cells were acti
- Page 42 and 43: on the left side and from 60.9 ± 1
- Page 44 and 45: #P52 Poster session II: Chemosensor
- Page 46 and 47: #P58 Poster session II: Chemosensor
- Page 48 and 49: #P64 Poster session II: Chemosensor
- Page 50 and 51: #P70 Poster session II: Chemosensor
- Page 52 and 53: esponses (net spikes) evoked by app
- Page 54 and 55: These findings demonstrate the capa
- Page 56 and 57: ecorded units tracked stimuli up to
- Page 58 and 59: elationship in the characteristic r
- Page 60 and 61: #P103 Poster session II: Chemosenso
- Page 62 and 63: #P108 Poster session III: Cortical
- Page 64 and 65: #P115 Poster session III: Cortical
- Page 66 and 67: luciferase-based reporter gene assa
- Page 68 and 69: #P128 Poster session III: Cortical
- Page 70 and 71: #P134 Poster session III: Cortical
- Page 72 and 73: 1987). MP’s olfactory discriminat
- Page 74 and 75: #P147 Poster session III: Cortical
- Page 76 and 77: discriminate between the H 2 S/IAA
- Page 78 and 79: #P160 Poster session IV: Chemosenso
- Page 80 and 81: subject to native regulatory mechan
- Page 82 and 83: #P173 Poster session IV: Chemosenso
- Page 86 and 87: #P186 Poster session IV: Chemosenso
- Page 88 and 89: #P192 Poster session IV: Chemosenso
- Page 90 and 91: #P198 Poster session IV: Chemosenso
- Page 92 and 93: eta, ENAC gamma), b-actin, PLC-b 2
- Page 94 and 95: presented in a recognition memory p
- Page 96 and 97: #P217 Poster session V: Chemosensor
- Page 98 and 99: educed granule cell spiking. These
- Page 100 and 101: #P230 Poster session V: Chemosensor
- Page 102 and 103: data here from mouse studies using
- Page 104 and 105: in taste bud induction and developm
- Page 106 and 107: trends in expression of GAP-43, OMP
- Page 108 and 109: elationship between concentration a
- Page 110 and 111: four (4 AFC) that they believe is m
- Page 112 and 113: #P268 Poster session VI: Chemosenso
- Page 114 and 115: pleasantness (r=.275 p=.006), where
- Page 116 and 117: utyl, hexyl, and octyl benzene). We
- Page 118 and 119: taller compared to wild-type mice.
- Page 120 and 121: animals over the age of P24 were gi
- Page 122 and 123: classify subjects as PROP non-taste
- Page 124 and 125: al 2008. Increases in glucose sensi
- Page 126 and 127: #P315 Poster session VII: Chemosens
- Page 128 and 129: differences in taste receptors is n
- Page 130 and 131: IndexAbaffy, T - 48Abakah, R - P299
- Page 132 and 133: Illig, K - 19, P109Imoto, T - P136I
- Page 134 and 135:
Rucker, J - P305Rudenga, K - P315Ru
- Page 136 and 137:
AChemS Abstracts 2009 | 135
- Page 138 and 139:
Registration7:30 am to 1:00 pm, 6:3
- Page 140 and 141:
Notes______________________________
- Page 142 and 143:
See you next yearat ournew venue!Tr